Message ID | 4677994.NrntHOKO7A@wuerfel (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
Hi Arnd, On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: >> smc91x fallout. The lpd270_defconfig failure looks like not covered by >> "ARM: fix typos in smc91x platform data" yet? > > It's not? > > This should be part of that patch: > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c > @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static struct resource smc91x_resources[] = { > }; > > struct smc91x_platdata smc91x_platdata = { > - .flags = SMC91X_USE_16BIT | SMC91X_NOWAIT; > + .flags = SMC91X_USE_16BIT | SMC91X_NOWAIT, Ah OK. Sorry, I thought there was a different reason. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
--- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static struct resource smc91x_resources[] = { }; struct smc91x_platdata smc91x_platdata = { - .flags = SMC91X_USE_16BIT | SMC91X_NOWAIT; + .flags = SMC91X_USE_16BIT | SMC91X_NOWAIT, }; static struct platform_device smc91x_device = {