@@ -1565,7 +1565,7 @@ struct clk *tegra_clk_register_pllxc(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
parent = __clk_lookup(parent_name);
if (!parent) {
WARN(1, "parent clk %s of %s must be registered first\n",
- name, parent_name);
+ parent_name, name);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
@@ -1665,7 +1665,7 @@ struct clk *tegra_clk_register_pllm(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
parent = __clk_lookup(parent_name);
if (!parent) {
WARN(1, "parent clk %s of %s must be registered first\n",
- name, parent_name);
+ parent_name, name);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
@@ -1706,7 +1706,7 @@ struct clk *tegra_clk_register_pllc(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
parent = __clk_lookup(parent_name);
if (!parent) {
WARN(1, "parent clk %s of %s must be registered first\n",
- name, parent_name);
+ parent_name, name);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
@@ -1830,7 +1830,7 @@ struct clk *tegra_clk_register_pllss(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
parent = __clk_lookup(parent_name);
if (!parent) {
WARN(1, "parent clk %s of %s must be registered first\n",
- name, parent_name);
+ parent_name, name);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
As previously the names of the present clock and its parent were swapped. Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> --- Hi, I'm not a native English speaker, but the way the current message is made me think that the clock that failed registration was the wrong one. Regards, Tomeu --- drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)