Message ID | abab9dc5af4b61da70672b99ad80175b94b4ec68.1376488215.git.mleitner@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Delegated to: | David Miller |
Headers | show |
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:53:27AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > This patch is based on 3.2.y branch, the one used by reported. Please let me > know if it should be different. Thanks. > > ---8<--- > > Commit 0d6a77079c475033cb622c07c5a880b392ef664e introduced a regression on > which routes to local delivery would not work anymore. Like this: > > $ ip -6 route add local 2001::/64 dev lo > $ ping6 -c1 2001::9 > PING 2001::9(2001::9) 56 data bytes > ping: sendmsg: Invalid argument > > As this is a local delivery, that commit would not allow the creation of a > neighbor entry and thus the packet cannot be sent. > > But as TPROXY scenario actually needs to avoid the neighbor entry creation only > for input flow, this patch now limits previous patch to input flow, keeping > output as before that patch. > > Reported-by: Debabrata Banerjee <dbavatar@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com> > CC: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Looks good, thanks Marcelo! Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> David, this patch is for all stable kernels except the 3.10 series. It does not apply cleanly throughout the whole longterm kernels but the changes should not be too difficult to adapt. Do you take care of this or can we do something to ease this process? Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:00:54 +0200 > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:53:27AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> This patch is based on 3.2.y branch, the one used by reported. Please let me >> know if it should be different. Thanks. >> >> ---8<--- >> >> Commit 0d6a77079c475033cb622c07c5a880b392ef664e introduced a regression on >> which routes to local delivery would not work anymore. Like this: >> >> $ ip -6 route add local 2001::/64 dev lo >> $ ping6 -c1 2001::9 >> PING 2001::9(2001::9) 56 data bytes >> ping: sendmsg: Invalid argument >> >> As this is a local delivery, that commit would not allow the creation of a >> neighbor entry and thus the packet cannot be sent. >> >> But as TPROXY scenario actually needs to avoid the neighbor entry creation only >> for input flow, this patch now limits previous patch to input flow, keeping >> output as before that patch. >> >> Reported-by: Debabrata Banerjee <dbavatar@gmail.com> >> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com> >> CC: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> > > Looks good, thanks Marcelo! > > Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> > > David, this patch is for all stable kernels except the 3.10 series. > It does not apply cleanly throughout the whole longterm kernels but the > changes should not be too difficult to adapt. Do you take care of this > or can we do something to ease this process? I've queued it up for -stable, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:54:54AM CEST, davem@davemloft.net wrote: >From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> >Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:00:54 +0200 > >> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:53:27AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>> This patch is based on 3.2.y branch, the one used by reported. Please let me >>> know if it should be different. Thanks. >>> >>> ---8<--- >>> >>> Commit 0d6a77079c475033cb622c07c5a880b392ef664e introduced a regression on >>> which routes to local delivery would not work anymore. Like this: >>> >>> $ ip -6 route add local 2001::/64 dev lo >>> $ ping6 -c1 2001::9 >>> PING 2001::9(2001::9) 56 data bytes >>> ping: sendmsg: Invalid argument >>> >>> As this is a local delivery, that commit would not allow the creation of a >>> neighbor entry and thus the packet cannot be sent. >>> >>> But as TPROXY scenario actually needs to avoid the neighbor entry creation only >>> for input flow, this patch now limits previous patch to input flow, keeping >>> output as before that patch. >>> >>> Reported-by: Debabrata Banerjee <dbavatar@gmail.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com> >>> CC: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> >> >> Looks good, thanks Marcelo! >> >> Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> >> >> David, this patch is for all stable kernels except the 3.10 series. >> It does not apply cleanly throughout the whole longterm kernels but the >> changes should not be too difficult to adapt. Do you take care of this >> or can we do something to ease this process? > >I've queued it up for -stable, thanks. Dave, is it possible to see the queue somewhere? Thanks. Jiri -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:09:58PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Dave, is it possible to see the queue somewhere?
Here: <http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/davem/stable/?state=*>
Greetings,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:12:31PM CEST, hannes@stressinduktion.org wrote: >On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:09:58PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Dave, is it possible to see the queue somewhere? > >Here: <http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/davem/stable/?state=*> > >Greetings, > > Hannes > Great. Thanks. ccing Ben. Dave, Ben told me he did not receive this patch from you yet and told me to bug you. So I'm doing that :) Thanks Jiri -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:54:54AM CEST, davem@davemloft.net wrote: >From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> >Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:00:54 +0200 > >> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:53:27AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>> This patch is based on 3.2.y branch, the one used by reported. Please let me >>> know if it should be different. Thanks. >>> >>> ---8<--- >>> >>> Commit 0d6a77079c475033cb622c07c5a880b392ef664e introduced a regression on >>> which routes to local delivery would not work anymore. Like this: >>> >>> $ ip -6 route add local 2001::/64 dev lo >>> $ ping6 -c1 2001::9 >>> PING 2001::9(2001::9) 56 data bytes >>> ping: sendmsg: Invalid argument >>> >>> As this is a local delivery, that commit would not allow the creation of a >>> neighbor entry and thus the packet cannot be sent. >>> >>> But as TPROXY scenario actually needs to avoid the neighbor entry creation only >>> for input flow, this patch now limits previous patch to input flow, keeping >>> output as before that patch. >>> >>> Reported-by: Debabrata Banerjee <dbavatar@gmail.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com> >>> CC: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> >> >> Looks good, thanks Marcelo! >> >> Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> >> >> David, this patch is for all stable kernels except the 3.10 series. >> It does not apply cleanly throughout the whole longterm kernels but the >> changes should not be too difficult to adapt. Do you take care of this >> or can we do something to ease this process? > >I've queued it up for -stable, thanks. Hi Dave. When do you plan to push this to stable maintainers? Thanks! Jiri -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 14:17:19 +0200 > When do you plan to push this to stable maintainers? Jiri, it's in the -stable queue and that means I will send it at an appropriate time. I'm working on a submission at the moment, but every extra query like your's that I have to answer takes up time I could be spending on it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 07:29:00PM CEST, davem@davemloft.net wrote: >From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> >Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 14:17:19 +0200 > >> When do you plan to push this to stable maintainers? > >Jiri, it's in the -stable queue and that means I will send it at an >appropriate time. > >I'm working on a submission at the moment, but every extra query like >your's that I have to answer takes up time I could be spending on it. I'm sorry Dave. I'm just worried. I don't want this patch to get lost. I expected this patch to be part of: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/bwh/linux-3.2.y-queue.git/commit/?id=dadcb7672a124159630f1f756dea8323bc4976bd But it is not there. I'm sorry again :/ Jiri -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c index 18ea73c..bc9103d 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/route.c +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c @@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ static struct rt6_info *rt6_alloc_clone(struct rt6_info *ort, } static struct rt6_info *ip6_pol_route(struct net *net, struct fib6_table *table, int oif, - struct flowi6 *fl6, int flags) + struct flowi6 *fl6, int flags, bool input) { struct fib6_node *fn; struct rt6_info *rt, *nrt; @@ -799,8 +799,11 @@ static struct rt6_info *ip6_pol_route(struct net *net, struct fib6_table *table, int attempts = 3; int err; int reachable = net->ipv6.devconf_all->forwarding ? 0 : RT6_LOOKUP_F_REACHABLE; + int local = RTF_NONEXTHOP; strict |= flags & RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE; + if (input) + local |= RTF_LOCAL; relookup: read_lock_bh(&table->tb6_lock); @@ -820,7 +823,7 @@ restart: read_unlock_bh(&table->tb6_lock); if (!dst_get_neighbour_raw(&rt->dst) - && !(rt->rt6i_flags & (RTF_NONEXTHOP | RTF_LOCAL))) + && !(rt->rt6i_flags & local)) nrt = rt6_alloc_cow(rt, &fl6->daddr, &fl6->saddr); else if (!(rt->dst.flags & DST_HOST)) nrt = rt6_alloc_clone(rt, &fl6->daddr); @@ -864,7 +867,7 @@ out2: static struct rt6_info *ip6_pol_route_input(struct net *net, struct fib6_table *table, struct flowi6 *fl6, int flags) { - return ip6_pol_route(net, table, fl6->flowi6_iif, fl6, flags); + return ip6_pol_route(net, table, fl6->flowi6_iif, fl6, flags, true); } void ip6_route_input(struct sk_buff *skb) @@ -890,7 +893,7 @@ void ip6_route_input(struct sk_buff *skb) static struct rt6_info *ip6_pol_route_output(struct net *net, struct fib6_table *table, struct flowi6 *fl6, int flags) { - return ip6_pol_route(net, table, fl6->flowi6_oif, fl6, flags); + return ip6_pol_route(net, table, fl6->flowi6_oif, fl6, flags, false); } struct dst_entry * ip6_route_output(struct net *net, const struct sock *sk,
This patch is based on 3.2.y branch, the one used by reported. Please let me know if it should be different. Thanks. ---8<--- Commit 0d6a77079c475033cb622c07c5a880b392ef664e introduced a regression on which routes to local delivery would not work anymore. Like this: $ ip -6 route add local 2001::/64 dev lo $ ping6 -c1 2001::9 PING 2001::9(2001::9) 56 data bytes ping: sendmsg: Invalid argument As this is a local delivery, that commit would not allow the creation of a neighbor entry and thus the packet cannot be sent. But as TPROXY scenario actually needs to avoid the neighbor entry creation only for input flow, this patch now limits previous patch to input flow, keeping output as before that patch. Reported-by: Debabrata Banerjee <dbavatar@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com> CC: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> --- net/ipv6/route.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)