Message ID | CACRpkdYM21hcH5d9rXyvjMPHQp429OZ1Zcy7uLU2tndoJcOmUQ@mail.gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [GIT,PULL] pin control fixes for the v5.17 series | expand |
On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 5:11 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > > some more pin control fixes that trickled in the last week or > two. Hmm. Am I confused because I thought I'd see a fix for the orangepi problem that Guenter has been reporting? That problem has been pending for quite a while now. Linus
The pull request you sent on Sun, 27 Feb 2022 02:11:27 +0100:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git tags/pinctrl-v5-17-3
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/6676ba2a6df6864a6b7b11f20166026e2201b627
Thank you!
On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 9:38 PM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 5:11 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > some more pin control fixes that trickled in the last week or > > two. > > Hmm. Am I confused because I thought I'd see a fix for the orangepi > problem that Guenter has been reporting? > > That problem has been pending for quite a while now. OK let's poke Hans, he usually fix things quickly so it must have been missed. Hans did you see Guenthers remark here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20220128172003.GA2666058@roeck-us.net/ Do you want to attempt patching it or shall I just revert the patch for now? Yours, Linus Walleij
On 2/28/22 06:43, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 9:38 PM Linus Torvalds > <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 5:11 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: >>> >>> some more pin control fixes that trickled in the last week or >>> two. >> >> Hmm. Am I confused because I thought I'd see a fix for the orangepi >> problem that Guenter has been reporting? >> >> That problem has been pending for quite a while now. > > OK let's poke Hans, he usually fix things quickly so it must have been missed. > > Hans did you see Guenthers remark here: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20220128172003.GA2666058@roeck-us.net/ > > Do you want to attempt patching it or shall I just revert the patch for now? > > Yours, > Linus Walleij The fix has long since been submitted and is available in linux-next. From my notes: Fix posted at https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/0f536cd8-01db-5d16-2cec-ec6d19409a49@xs4all.nl/ and in linux-next as commit 3c5412cdec9f ("pinctrl-sunxi: sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_direction_in/output: use correct offset"). The fix exposes a lockdep splat for which a fix is posted at https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220216040037.22730-1-samuel@sholland.org/ This patch is available in linux-next as commit 4649b97042c3 ("pinctrl: sunxi: Use unique lockdep classes for IRQs"). Guenter
On 2/28/22 15:59, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 2/28/22 06:43, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 9:38 PM Linus Torvalds >> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 5:11 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> some more pin control fixes that trickled in the last week or >>>> two. >>> >>> Hmm. Am I confused because I thought I'd see a fix for the orangepi >>> problem that Guenter has been reporting? >>> >>> That problem has been pending for quite a while now. >> >> OK let's poke Hans, he usually fix things quickly so it must have been missed. >> >> Hans did you see Guenthers remark here: >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20220128172003.GA2666058@roeck-us.net/ >> >> Do you want to attempt patching it or shall I just revert the patch for now? >> >> Yours, >> Linus Walleij > > The fix has long since been submitted and is available in linux-next. > > From my notes: > > Fix posted at > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/0f536cd8-01db-5d16-2cec-ec6d19409a49@xs4all.nl/ > and in linux-next as commit 3c5412cdec9f ("pinctrl-sunxi: > sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_direction_in/output: use correct offset"). > The fix exposes a lockdep splat for which a fix is posted at > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220216040037.22730-1-samuel@sholland.org/ > This patch is available in linux-next as commit 4649b97042c3 ("pinctrl: > sunxi: Use unique lockdep classes for IRQs"). Thank you, Guenter, I was just working on a similar reply. That's my understanding as well. Regards, Hans > > Guenter