| Message ID | 20210305153730.3671327-1-giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com |
|---|---|
| State | Rejected |
| Headers | show |
| Series | toolchain: disable gcc bug 68485 if gcc version >= 10.x | expand |
Giulio, All, On 2021-03-05 16:37 +0100, Giulio Benetti spake thusly: > Since gcc version 10.x bug 68485 doesn't show anymore, so let's make it > enabled up to versino 10.x excluded. > > Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com> > --- > toolchain/Config.in | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/toolchain/Config.in b/toolchain/Config.in > index 553612c4aa..0cd8b82059 100644 > --- a/toolchain/Config.in > +++ b/toolchain/Config.in > @@ -131,11 +131,12 @@ config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_GCC_BUG_64735 > default y if !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_SUPPORTS_ALWAYS_LOCKFREE_ATOMIC_INTS && \ > !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_7 > > -# https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68485. This bug still > -# exists in gcc 9.x > +# https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68485. This bug no > +# longer exists in gcc 10.x I don;t understand, because you said exactly the opposite ion that bug tracker: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68485#c9 bug still exists on gcc 10.2, is there any news about it? So what? ;-) Regards, Yann E. MORIN. > config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_GCC_BUG_68485 > bool > default y if BR2_microblaze > + depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_10 > > # https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85180. This bug no > # longer exists in gcc 8.x. > -- > 2.25.1 > > _______________________________________________ > buildroot mailing list > buildroot@busybox.net > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
Hi Yann, On 3/6/21 11:13 PM, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > Giulio, All, > > On 2021-03-05 16:37 +0100, Giulio Benetti spake thusly: >> Since gcc version 10.x bug 68485 doesn't show anymore, so let's make it >> enabled up to versino 10.x excluded. >> >> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com> >> --- >> toolchain/Config.in | 5 +++-- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/toolchain/Config.in b/toolchain/Config.in >> index 553612c4aa..0cd8b82059 100644 >> --- a/toolchain/Config.in >> +++ b/toolchain/Config.in >> @@ -131,11 +131,12 @@ config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_GCC_BUG_64735 >> default y if !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_SUPPORTS_ALWAYS_LOCKFREE_ATOMIC_INTS && \ >> !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_7 >> >> -# https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68485. This bug still >> -# exists in gcc 9.x >> +# https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68485. This bug no >> +# longer exists in gcc 10.x > > I don;t understand, because you said exactly the opposite ion that bug > tracker: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68485#c9 > > bug still exists on gcc 10.2, is there any news about it? > > So what? ;-) You're right, I've re-tested all cases I can test and on 10.2 doesn't work, so please drop this patch. Thank you Best regards
diff --git a/toolchain/Config.in b/toolchain/Config.in index 553612c4aa..0cd8b82059 100644 --- a/toolchain/Config.in +++ b/toolchain/Config.in @@ -131,11 +131,12 @@ config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_GCC_BUG_64735 default y if !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_SUPPORTS_ALWAYS_LOCKFREE_ATOMIC_INTS && \ !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_7 -# https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68485. This bug still -# exists in gcc 9.x +# https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68485. This bug no +# longer exists in gcc 10.x config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_GCC_BUG_68485 bool default y if BR2_microblaze + depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_10 # https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85180. This bug no # longer exists in gcc 8.x.
Since gcc version 10.x bug 68485 doesn't show anymore, so let's make it enabled up to versino 10.x excluded. Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com> --- toolchain/Config.in | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)