| Message ID | 20200116045918.75597-1-brianvv@google.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Delegated to: | BPF Maintainers |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [bpf-next] libbpf: Fix unneeded extra initialization in bpf_map_batch_common | expand |
On 1/16/20 5:59 AM, Brian Vazquez wrote: > bpf_attr doesn't required to be declared with '= {}' as memset is used > in the code. > > Fixes: 2ab3d86ea1859 ("libbpf: Add libbpf support to batch ops") > Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> > Signed-off-by: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@google.com> Applied, thanks!
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c index 317727d612149..ed42b006533c4 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c @@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ static int bpf_map_batch_common(int cmd, int fd, void *in_batch, __u32 *count, const struct bpf_map_batch_opts *opts) { - union bpf_attr attr = {}; + union bpf_attr attr; int ret; if (!OPTS_VALID(opts, bpf_map_batch_opts))
bpf_attr doesn't required to be declared with '= {}' as memset is used in the code. Fixes: 2ab3d86ea1859 ("libbpf: Add libbpf support to batch ops") Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@google.com> --- tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)