diff mbox

[v2,2/2] sctp: delay calls to sk_data_ready() as much as possible

Message ID 703257ed516669b180fcce57e6745b1853da9a95.1459952558.git.marcelo.leitner@gmail.com
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Commit Message

Marcelo Ricardo Leitner April 6, 2016, 5:53 p.m. UTC
Currently, the processing of multiple chunks in a single SCTP packet
leads to multiple calls to sk_data_ready, causing multiple wake up
signals which are costly and doesn't make it wake up any faster.

With this patch it will notice that the wake up is pending and will do it
before leaving the state machine interpreter, latest place possible to
do it realiably and cleanly.

Note that sk_data_ready events are not dependent on asocs, unlike waking
up writers.

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
---
 include/net/sctp/structs.h | 3 ++-
 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c   | 5 +++++
 net/sctp/ulpqueue.c        | 4 ++--
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Jakub Sitnicki April 7, 2016, 8:05 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 07:53 PM CEST, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote:
> Currently, the processing of multiple chunks in a single SCTP packet
> leads to multiple calls to sk_data_ready, causing multiple wake up
> signals which are costly and doesn't make it wake up any faster.
>
> With this patch it will notice that the wake up is pending and will do it
> before leaving the state machine interpreter, latest place possible to
> do it realiably and cleanly.
>
> Note that sk_data_ready events are not dependent on asocs, unlike waking
> up writers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
> ---

[...]

> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> index 7fe56d0acabf66cfd8fe29dfdb45f7620b470ac7..e7042f9ce63b0cfca50cae252f51b60b68cb5731 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> @@ -1742,6 +1742,11 @@ out:
>  			error = sctp_outq_uncork(&asoc->outqueue, gfp);
>  	} else if (local_cork)
>  		error = sctp_outq_uncork(&asoc->outqueue, gfp);
> +
> +	if (sctp_sk(ep->base.sk)->pending_data_ready) {
> +		ep->base.sk->sk_data_ready(ep->base.sk);
> +		sctp_sk(ep->base.sk)->pending_data_ready = 0;
> +	}
>  	return error;
>  nomem:
>  	error = -ENOMEM;

Would it make sense to introduce a local variable for ep->base.sk (and
make this function 535+1 lines long ;-)

      struct sock *sk = ep->base.sk;

... like sctp_ulpq_tail_event() does?

Thanks,
Jakub
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner April 7, 2016, 1:35 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 10:05:32AM +0200, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 07:53 PM CEST, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Currently, the processing of multiple chunks in a single SCTP packet
> > leads to multiple calls to sk_data_ready, causing multiple wake up
> > signals which are costly and doesn't make it wake up any faster.
> >
> > With this patch it will notice that the wake up is pending and will do it
> > before leaving the state machine interpreter, latest place possible to
> > do it realiably and cleanly.
> >
> > Note that sk_data_ready events are not dependent on asocs, unlike waking
> > up writers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
> > ---
> 
> [...]
> 
> > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> > index 7fe56d0acabf66cfd8fe29dfdb45f7620b470ac7..e7042f9ce63b0cfca50cae252f51b60b68cb5731 100644
> > --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> > @@ -1742,6 +1742,11 @@ out:
> >  			error = sctp_outq_uncork(&asoc->outqueue, gfp);
> >  	} else if (local_cork)
> >  		error = sctp_outq_uncork(&asoc->outqueue, gfp);
> > +
> > +	if (sctp_sk(ep->base.sk)->pending_data_ready) {
> > +		ep->base.sk->sk_data_ready(ep->base.sk);
> > +		sctp_sk(ep->base.sk)->pending_data_ready = 0;
> > +	}
> >  	return error;
> >  nomem:
> >  	error = -ENOMEM;
> 
> Would it make sense to introduce a local variable for ep->base.sk (and
> make this function 535+1 lines long ;-)
> 
>       struct sock *sk = ep->base.sk;
> 
> ... like sctp_ulpq_tail_event() does?

I guess so, yes. Same for sctp_sk() cast then. I´ll post a new version
later, thanks.

  Marcelo
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
index 1a6a626904bba4223b7921bbb4be41c2550271a7..21cb11107e378b4da1e7efde22fab4349496e35a 100644
--- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h
+++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
@@ -217,7 +217,8 @@  struct sctp_sock {
 		v4mapped:1,
 		frag_interleave:1,
 		recvrcvinfo:1,
-		recvnxtinfo:1;
+		recvnxtinfo:1,
+		pending_data_ready:1;
 
 	atomic_t pd_mode;
 	/* Receive to here while partial delivery is in effect. */
diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
index 7fe56d0acabf66cfd8fe29dfdb45f7620b470ac7..e7042f9ce63b0cfca50cae252f51b60b68cb5731 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
@@ -1742,6 +1742,11 @@  out:
 			error = sctp_outq_uncork(&asoc->outqueue, gfp);
 	} else if (local_cork)
 		error = sctp_outq_uncork(&asoc->outqueue, gfp);
+
+	if (sctp_sk(ep->base.sk)->pending_data_ready) {
+		ep->base.sk->sk_data_ready(ep->base.sk);
+		sctp_sk(ep->base.sk)->pending_data_ready = 0;
+	}
 	return error;
 nomem:
 	error = -ENOMEM;
diff --git a/net/sctp/ulpqueue.c b/net/sctp/ulpqueue.c
index ce469d648ffbe166f9ae1c5650f481256f31a7f8..72e5b3e41cddf9d79371de8ab01484e4601b97b6 100644
--- a/net/sctp/ulpqueue.c
+++ b/net/sctp/ulpqueue.c
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@  int sctp_ulpq_tail_event(struct sctp_ulpq *ulpq, struct sctp_ulpevent *event)
 		sctp_ulpq_clear_pd(ulpq);
 
 	if (queue == &sk->sk_receive_queue)
-		sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
+		sctp_sk(sk)->pending_data_ready = 1;
 	return 1;
 
 out_free:
@@ -1140,5 +1140,5 @@  void sctp_ulpq_abort_pd(struct sctp_ulpq *ulpq, gfp_t gfp)
 
 	/* If there is data waiting, send it up the socket now. */
 	if (sctp_ulpq_clear_pd(ulpq) || ev)
-		sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
+		sctp_sk(sk)->pending_data_ready = 1;
 }