{"id":2232088,"url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/patches/2232088/?format=json","web_url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/gcc/patch/20260502144900.3752411-1-xry111@xry111.site/","project":{"id":17,"url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/projects/17/?format=json","name":"GNU Compiler Collection","link_name":"gcc","list_id":"gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org","list_email":"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org","web_url":null,"scm_url":null,"webscm_url":null,"list_archive_url":"","list_archive_url_format":"","commit_url_format":""},"msgid":"<20260502144900.3752411-1-xry111@xry111.site>","list_archive_url":null,"date":"2026-05-02T14:48:12","name":"LoongArch: Allow printing symbolic name with \"%c\" in inline asm","commit_ref":null,"pull_url":null,"state":"new","archived":false,"hash":"6cbfdd563a48c76d86dd164eb01fda9f9dd70443","submitter":{"id":84026,"url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/people/84026/?format=json","name":"Xi Ruoyao","email":"xry111@xry111.site"},"delegate":null,"mbox":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/gcc/patch/20260502144900.3752411-1-xry111@xry111.site/mbox/","series":[{"id":502535,"url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/series/502535/?format=json","web_url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/gcc/list/?series=502535","date":"2026-05-02T14:48:12","name":"LoongArch: Allow printing symbolic name with \"%c\" in inline asm","version":1,"mbox":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/series/502535/mbox/"}],"comments":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/patches/2232088/comments/","check":"pending","checks":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/patches/2232088/checks/","tags":{},"related":[],"headers":{"Return-Path":"","X-Original-To":["incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org","gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org"],"Delivered-To":["patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org","gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org"],"Authentication-Results":["legolas.ozlabs.org;\n\tdkim=pass (1024-bit key;\n unprotected) header.d=xry111.site header.i=@xry111.site header.a=rsa-sha256\n header.s=default header.b=RNG2Nvvn;\n\tdkim-atps=neutral","legolas.ozlabs.org;\n spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org\n (client-ip=2620:52:6:3111::32; helo=vm01.sourceware.org;\n envelope-from=gcc-patches-bounces~incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org;\n receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org)","sourceware.org;\n\tdkim=pass (1024-bit key,\n unprotected) header.d=xry111.site header.i=@xry111.site header.a=rsa-sha256\n header.s=default header.b=RNG2Nvvn","sourceware.org;\n dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xry111.site","sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xry111.site","server2.sourceware.org;\n arc=none smtp.remote-ip=89.208.246.23"],"Received":["from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org\n [IPv6:2620:52:6:3111::32])\n\t(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)\n\t key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384)\n\t(No client certificate requested)\n\tby legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4g79n61PbXz1yJ0\n\tfor ; Sun, 03 May 2026 00:50:18 +1000 (AEST)","from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])\n\tby sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBA94BB3BA8\n\tfor ; Sat, 2 May 2026 14:50:16 +0000 (GMT)","from xry111.site (xry111.site [89.208.246.23])\n by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D773E4BABF16\n for ; Sat, 2 May 2026 14:49:50 +0000 (GMT)","from stargazer (unknown\n [IPv6:2409:8a4c:e1c:abf0:bb72:8d18:d3cb:9175])\n (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)\n key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384)\n (Client did not present a certificate)\n (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site)\n by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4833765992;\n Sat, 2 May 2026 10:49:15 -0400 (EDT)"],"DKIM-Filter":["OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5BBA94BB3BA8","OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D773E4BABF16"],"DMARC-Filter":"OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org D773E4BABF16","ARC-Filter":"OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org D773E4BABF16","ARC-Seal":"i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1777733391; cv=none;\n b=Gtm6Lwea4a+T0l+B0KvOJM4Nxc8znxnS5TlVI0mQkRLT1p2v+AkHDC4CX5JGNdLX2nq6Nu2JZ/ac/qjuCjbxLzpKopEnB4VMh0vCrWVn+vd3R+k3Ez3e1ODC5sPXPNr2mD6DYVA+GF+gQLGnRf3ymv6vKsTMHL7LvdgDpkRHSXc=","ARC-Message-Signature":"i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;\n t=1777733391; c=relaxed/simple;\n bh=dFHlnq3A4mxzysLA29OK6wjF+/1ITws4pIU9h4d8XcU=;\n h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version;\n b=VMKPX5Hrf6MB0YRYW0jYizl4bJ1wUwDlhymATo6Wd2qbXDbyMNqw3VqkFGmt1pP+OZ5uqfAERNs6t4sJBzRYPBDy+dMVzYLhYiZZoHgye8DkFf/0fcJxGpkOOKs0INUQYx/taFSCtQQJc1/+qLz/5KKPQSQ8bnNsfZIj4fgx/+o=","ARC-Authentication-Results":"i=1; server2.sourceware.org","DKIM-Signature":"v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xry111.site;\n s=default; t=1777733359;\n bh=t5V4+U5JsvwoZ1ivASZFFqPZE4Hee7xjNuNd+d6Rvdw=;\n h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From;\n b=RNG2Nvvnolga4YaP+Phptj4mdET00BY6HUlX7Omvb1ubwtdFg8RmocQM1UeR+tHiJ\n f7ttqYPT2E8FXj6r72GDBZ7Js2uaaJjITov8MB4qqTR0X1R7cGxHmlIqFK+uEIbj0t\n aiItAGmymGAUSMLigyiSZQ5gcViUooeSxgJKk/4c=","From":"Xi Ruoyao ","To":"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org","Cc":"Lulu Cheng , WANG Xuerui ,\n Mingcong Bai , Zixing Liu ,\n Xi Ruoyao ","Subject":"[PATCH] LoongArch: Allow printing symbolic name with \"%c\" in inline\n asm","Date":"Sat, 2 May 2026 22:48:12 +0800","Message-ID":"<20260502144900.3752411-1-xry111@xry111.site>","X-Mailer":"git-send-email 2.54.0","MIME-Version":"1.0","Content-Transfer-Encoding":"8bit","X-BeenThere":"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org","X-Mailman-Version":"2.1.30","Precedence":"list","List-Id":"Gcc-patches mailing list ","List-Unsubscribe":",\n ","List-Archive":"","List-Post":"","List-Help":"","List-Subscribe":",\n ","Errors-To":"gcc-patches-bounces~incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org"},"content":"The gcc.dg/ipa/pr122458.c test relies on this. The doc says \"%c\" is\nfor \"constant operand\" and I think there's no harm to consider symbolic\nname a constant operand.\n\ngcc/\n\n\t* config/loongarch/loongarch.cc (loongarch_print_operand): Print\n\tthe symbol name for SYMBOL_REF with %c.\n---\n\nBootstrapped and regtested on loongarch64-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk and\n16.2 (as pr122458.c is already in gcc-16)?\n\n gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc | 4 +++-\n 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)","diff":"diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc\nindex bdafcd5c539..aa9bd9c0f93 100644\n--- a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc\n+++ b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc\n@@ -6722,7 +6722,9 @@ loongarch_print_operand (FILE *file, rtx op, int letter)\n \n \n case 'c':\n- if (CONST_INT_P (op))\n+ if (SYMBOL_REF_P (op))\n+\toutput_addr_const (asm_out_file, op);\n+ else if (CONST_INT_P (op))\n \tfprintf (file, HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC, INTVAL (op));\n else\n \toutput_operand_lossage (\"unsupported operand for code '%c'\", letter);\n","prefixes":[]}