{"id":2229590,"url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/1.1/patches/2229590/?format=json","web_url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/gcc/patch/20260428135745.D02194BA902A@sourceware.org/","project":{"id":17,"url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/1.1/projects/17/?format=json","name":"GNU Compiler Collection","link_name":"gcc","list_id":"gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org","list_email":"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org","web_url":null,"scm_url":null,"webscm_url":null},"msgid":"<20260428135745.D02194BA902A@sourceware.org>","date":"2026-04-28T13:57:17","name":"[x86] override vector_costs::better_epilogue_loop_than_p","commit_ref":null,"pull_url":null,"state":"new","archived":false,"hash":"dbac8368e0f45306842974b61d760cf73807ae76","submitter":{"id":4338,"url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/1.1/people/4338/?format=json","name":"Richard Biener","email":"rguenther@suse.de"},"delegate":null,"mbox":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/gcc/patch/20260428135745.D02194BA902A@sourceware.org/mbox/","series":[{"id":501861,"url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/1.1/series/501861/?format=json","web_url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/gcc/list/?series=501861","date":"2026-04-28T13:57:17","name":"[x86] override vector_costs::better_epilogue_loop_than_p","version":1,"mbox":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/series/501861/mbox/"}],"comments":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/patches/2229590/comments/","check":"pending","checks":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/patches/2229590/checks/","tags":{},"headers":{"Return-Path":"<gcc-patches-bounces~incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>","X-Original-To":["incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org","gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org"],"Delivered-To":["patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org","gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org"],"Authentication-Results":["legolas.ozlabs.org;\n\tdkim=pass (1024-bit key;\n unprotected) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256\n header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=xQ/wz/DX;\n\tdkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256\n header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=z5APzhrx;\n\tdkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de\n header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=xQ/wz/DX;\n\tdkim=neutral header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256\n header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=z5APzhrx;\n\tdkim-atps=neutral","legolas.ozlabs.org;\n spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org\n (client-ip=38.145.34.32; helo=vm01.sourceware.org;\n envelope-from=gcc-patches-bounces~incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org;\n receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org)","sourceware.org;\n\tdkim=pass (1024-bit key,\n unprotected) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256\n header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=xQ/wz/DX;\n\tdkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256\n header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=z5APzhrx;\n\tdkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de\n header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=xQ/wz/DX;\n\tdkim=neutral header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256\n header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=z5APzhrx","sourceware.org;\n dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de","sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de","server2.sourceware.org;\n arc=none smtp.remote-ip=195.135.223.130","smtp-out1.suse.de;\n\tnone"],"Received":["from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org [38.145.34.32])\n\t(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)\n\t key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384)\n\t(No client certificate requested)\n\tby legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4g4hpM5tx0z1yHv\n\tfor <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:57:47 +1000 (AEST)","from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])\n\tby sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D02194BA902A\n\tfor <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:57:45 +0000 (GMT)","from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130])\n by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 062124B920BB\n for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:57:19 +0000 (GMT)","from murzim.nue2.suse.org (unknown [10.168.4.243])\n (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)\n key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest\n SHA256)\n (No client certificate requested)\n by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D25E6A85C;\n Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:57:18 +0000 (UTC)"],"DKIM-Filter":["OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D02194BA902A","OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 062124B920BB"],"DMARC-Filter":"OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 062124B920BB","ARC-Filter":"OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 062124B920BB","ARC-Seal":"i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1777384639; cv=none;\n b=czd0WqcMQ/UE9BA5qCDln11a3sh0PXELCu2zgkeG5AXXWIZuMzJYxgt/JWPDlDFUdQtCqAt2fEbRORa9McLy5wgSb8Bug/hR2bylbooA5e0oTPmzSl9IzTuaUEXhMGGLTC/xtAudmKbSEW8ealfnqB8FYdSac5PLdHPfbpymNDM=","ARC-Message-Signature":"i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;\n t=1777384639; c=relaxed/simple;\n bh=8y0BnokfjNQKTQfrSfsdXKNWO5YuFV0Ng7kxCPbHWZg=;\n h=DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:Date:\n From:To:Subject:MIME-Version;\n b=haK1xdr3G5SZJP01LGnLR8kq2DAh3XYoEIjgqRaU1dVqcLXCJ85GcJfXBJvt9fMQDKE3VYRuYbp9l1XCMrQcuu95EYIichkOFqt2VwoBYyOVw+JokdccUHcMKWRDcBQHEGkNeNpBCeg/9CaIUiUcSHcKs89ZpZuUeLjVesG0JxU=","ARC-Authentication-Results":"i=1; server2.sourceware.org","DKIM-Signature":["v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de;\n s=susede2_rsa;\n t=1777384638;\n h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:\n content-type:content-type; bh=e0rM7xXehGTrhKe8/7+5JBUNRYS0dzXmgqjTGT6FDHU=;\n b=xQ/wz/DXJYXqhnwpzdAe9EJHqT04cj93bBq/sMs6kUMbaWQNqP3PcD/xpZxXScpm9NY5NN\n m10O0TS7w8I2V0Uvb2MDXSVTC5cZ3Z8fOIh+ApeWRCGFMv92Wlwmd2Brxet7X44X5o6Mxn\n WEH1aHGK8didMP2oD0KSvScFzwfDtOI=","v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de;\n s=susede2_ed25519; t=1777384638;\n h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:\n content-type:content-type; bh=e0rM7xXehGTrhKe8/7+5JBUNRYS0dzXmgqjTGT6FDHU=;\n b=z5APzhrxjBI8YT6lY6weHCResst5H0cA71zcEVdMnitmvjj/GKIbEwCup8UkA0dR/eFB6n\n 0MSrX3muabXyaHDg==","v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de;\n s=susede2_rsa;\n t=1777384638;\n h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:\n content-type:content-type; bh=e0rM7xXehGTrhKe8/7+5JBUNRYS0dzXmgqjTGT6FDHU=;\n b=xQ/wz/DXJYXqhnwpzdAe9EJHqT04cj93bBq/sMs6kUMbaWQNqP3PcD/xpZxXScpm9NY5NN\n m10O0TS7w8I2V0Uvb2MDXSVTC5cZ3Z8fOIh+ApeWRCGFMv92Wlwmd2Brxet7X44X5o6Mxn\n WEH1aHGK8didMP2oD0KSvScFzwfDtOI=","v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de;\n s=susede2_ed25519; t=1777384638;\n h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:\n content-type:content-type; bh=e0rM7xXehGTrhKe8/7+5JBUNRYS0dzXmgqjTGT6FDHU=;\n b=z5APzhrxjBI8YT6lY6weHCResst5H0cA71zcEVdMnitmvjj/GKIbEwCup8UkA0dR/eFB6n\n 0MSrX3muabXyaHDg=="],"Date":"Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:57:17 +0200 (CEST)","From":"Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>","To":"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org","cc":"hongtao.liu@intel.com","Subject":"[PATCH] [x86] override vector_costs::better_epilogue_loop_than_p","MIME-Version":"1.0","Content-Type":"text/plain; charset=US-ASCII","X-Spamd-Result":"default: False [-1.80 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%];\n MISSING_MID(2.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000];\n NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];\n ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];\n FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[];\n RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2];\n DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519];\n FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];\n TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];\n DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[murzim.nue2.suse.org:helo,gcc.target:url]","X-BeenThere":"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org","X-Mailman-Version":"2.1.30","Precedence":"list","List-Id":"Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>","List-Unsubscribe":"<https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,\n <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>","List-Archive":"<https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>","List-Post":"<mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>","List-Help":"<mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>","List-Subscribe":"<https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,\n <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>","Errors-To":"gcc-patches-bounces~incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org","Message-Id":"<20260428135745.D02194BA902A@sourceware.org>"},"content":"The following resolves the gcc.target/i386/vect-epilogues-3.c failure\nwhen --param ix86-vect-compare-costs=1 is specified.  When the target\nrequests multiple epilogues to be used and the new candidate is the\nepilogue of choice of the currently prevailing epilogue keep that.\n\nBootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, with the default compare\nswitch patch applied, testing in progress.\n\nOK?\n\nThanks,\nRichard.\n\n\t* config/i386/i386.cc (ix86_vector_costs::better_epilogue_loop_than_p):\n\tNew.  If the other loop suggests this as epilog prefer other.\n---\n gcc/config/i386/i386.cc | 18 ++++++++++++++++++\n 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)","diff":"diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc\nindex 6d34b23c2d6..2beca77d810 100644\n--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc\n+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc\n@@ -26126,6 +26126,8 @@ public:\n \t\t\t      vect_cost_model_location where) override;\n   void finish_cost (const vector_costs *) override;\n   bool better_main_loop_than_p (const vector_costs *) const override;\n+  bool better_epilogue_loop_than_p (const vector_costs *other,\n+\t\t\t\t    loop_vec_info main_loop) const;\n \n private:\n \n@@ -27007,6 +27009,22 @@ ix86_vector_costs::better_main_loop_than_p (const vector_costs *other) const\n   return vector_costs::better_main_loop_than_p (other);\n }\n \n+/* Return true if THIS should be preferred over OTHER as epilog vector\n+   loop when vectorizing MAIN_LOOP.  */\n+\n+bool\n+ix86_vector_costs::better_epilogue_loop_than_p (const vector_costs *other,\n+\t\t\t\t\t\tloop_vec_info main_loop) const\n+{\n+  /* The x86 target allows for multiple vector epilogues, if THIS is\n+     the suggested epilog mode of OTHER then keep the latter.  */\n+  int tem;\n+  if (GET_MODE_SIZE (other->suggested_epilogue_mode (tem))\n+      == GET_MODE_SIZE (this->vinfo ()->vector_mode))\n+    return false;\n+  return vector_costs::better_epilogue_loop_than_p (other, main_loop);\n+}\n+\n /* Validate target specific memory model bits in VAL. */\n \n static unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT\n","prefixes":["x86"]}