{"id":2229453,"url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/1.1/patches/2229453/?format=json","web_url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/gcc/patch/20260428091201.E57184BB5899@sourceware.org/","project":{"id":17,"url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/1.1/projects/17/?format=json","name":"GNU Compiler Collection","link_name":"gcc","list_id":"gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org","list_email":"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org","web_url":null,"scm_url":null,"webscm_url":null},"msgid":"<20260428091201.E57184BB5899@sourceware.org>","date":"2026-04-28T09:11:25","name":"[4/4] Add comment to vect_estimate_min_profitable_iters","commit_ref":null,"pull_url":null,"state":"new","archived":false,"hash":"c836213d6f55868934e065cd450ed158bfb6c107","submitter":{"id":4338,"url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/1.1/people/4338/?format=json","name":"Richard Biener","email":"rguenther@suse.de"},"delegate":null,"mbox":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/gcc/patch/20260428091201.E57184BB5899@sourceware.org/mbox/","series":[{"id":501803,"url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/1.1/series/501803/?format=json","web_url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/gcc/list/?series=501803","date":"2026-04-28T09:11:06","name":"[1/4] Simplify vect_get_known_peeling_cost","version":1,"mbox":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/series/501803/mbox/"}],"comments":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/patches/2229453/comments/","check":"pending","checks":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/patches/2229453/checks/","tags":{},"headers":{"Return-Path":"<gcc-patches-bounces~incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>","X-Original-To":["incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org","gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org"],"Delivered-To":["patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org","gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org"],"Authentication-Results":["legolas.ozlabs.org;\n\tdkim=pass (1024-bit key;\n unprotected) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256\n header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=akBtl+2q;\n\tdkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256\n header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=oAucTNqr;\n\tdkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de\n header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=akBtl+2q;\n\tdkim=neutral header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256\n header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=oAucTNqr;\n\tdkim-atps=neutral","legolas.ozlabs.org;\n spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org\n (client-ip=2620:52:6:3111::32; helo=vm01.sourceware.org;\n envelope-from=gcc-patches-bounces~incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org;\n receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org)","sourceware.org;\n\tdkim=pass (1024-bit key,\n unprotected) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256\n header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=akBtl+2q;\n\tdkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256\n header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=oAucTNqr;\n\tdkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de\n header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=akBtl+2q;\n\tdkim=neutral header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256\n header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=oAucTNqr","sourceware.org;\n dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de","sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de","server2.sourceware.org;\n arc=none smtp.remote-ip=195.135.223.131","smtp-out2.suse.de;\n\tnone"],"Received":["from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org\n [IPv6:2620:52:6:3111::32])\n\t(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)\n\t key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384)\n\t(No client certificate requested)\n\tby legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4g4ZSg6XFVz1xvV\n\tfor <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 19:12:03 +1000 (AEST)","from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])\n\tby sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57184BB5899\n\tfor <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:12:01 +0000 (GMT)","from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131])\n by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C43B4BB5899\n for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:11:26 +0000 (GMT)","from murzim.nue2.suse.org (unknown [10.168.4.243])\n (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)\n key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest\n SHA256)\n (No client certificate requested)\n by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84AB05BD22\n for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:11:25 +0000 (UTC)"],"DKIM-Filter":["OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E57184BB5899","OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6C43B4BB5899"],"DMARC-Filter":"OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 6C43B4BB5899","ARC-Filter":"OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 6C43B4BB5899","ARC-Seal":"i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1777367486; cv=none;\n b=WP3zROi2PFhXq1pvjYTQybPk0qyn5YX2wE0u3EH6g7Y+iqWP7tDzc0kMrtJUQlZhpAuHUf8NrotnvL9FU8ksF8p9uIV5/YDfEEkUU/eyf3jOeEKiYytgDVEks37Ac/VZoAzQbyYSKShJas9EESOpgNlrXp/st6rNVOWLOZaFmgY=","ARC-Message-Signature":"i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;\n t=1777367486; c=relaxed/simple;\n bh=uxZpg4cJvb+Ajex5VEtjJVdRAo0maclrXXfbNC89fek=;\n h=DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:Date:\n From:To:Subject:MIME-Version;\n b=towRz5TLGjcS4CXXOZ7hHd9U4/rG2TM7gAxCWMJi7CsvoJ+P9w3wLj3Z1Z8zk+KPmfNvDlOQ/DEDoJ7tXdUlcwEbwdK2y/6vyoKjUN18YkjMK3nQ4qAW/mEoevhkXpeDQBe12uL9+pf9+Wash5UXQnNZL1mmUq7ydaieHuhCGqM=","ARC-Authentication-Results":"i=1; server2.sourceware.org","DKIM-Signature":["v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de;\n s=susede2_rsa;\n t=1777367485;\n h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:\n content-type:content-type; bh=jRWkuXzsv1F6aKG9kQ14h6YZCxEAR57CpKQJTp5JPFU=;\n b=akBtl+2qGfH8+izrjm9+8wry+7kxGYu+nZhXfG0pWexxHL6dEa+8bTwZsVgEAux9coIB1M\n nGL+9re35y/2JTxfFGseA63q72OnKHVwEthFoyd7Xygys2pTrQgH0qhORsCQjkmrjkv1i3\n 65jUYanD9i3kd9q9D4YAVGGgY7Y73OI=","v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de;\n s=susede2_ed25519; t=1777367485;\n h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:\n content-type:content-type; bh=jRWkuXzsv1F6aKG9kQ14h6YZCxEAR57CpKQJTp5JPFU=;\n b=oAucTNqrsPO8LAmwsv2cvUBX44XPiaRgejMhkoinLzFKETD5lYdKlJ+8SUdGIbDYFdi+7d\n 36opGjwnSINmT0Ag==","v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de;\n s=susede2_rsa;\n t=1777367485;\n h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:\n content-type:content-type; bh=jRWkuXzsv1F6aKG9kQ14h6YZCxEAR57CpKQJTp5JPFU=;\n b=akBtl+2qGfH8+izrjm9+8wry+7kxGYu+nZhXfG0pWexxHL6dEa+8bTwZsVgEAux9coIB1M\n nGL+9re35y/2JTxfFGseA63q72OnKHVwEthFoyd7Xygys2pTrQgH0qhORsCQjkmrjkv1i3\n 65jUYanD9i3kd9q9D4YAVGGgY7Y73OI=","v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de;\n s=susede2_ed25519; t=1777367485;\n h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:\n content-type:content-type; bh=jRWkuXzsv1F6aKG9kQ14h6YZCxEAR57CpKQJTp5JPFU=;\n b=oAucTNqrsPO8LAmwsv2cvUBX44XPiaRgejMhkoinLzFKETD5lYdKlJ+8SUdGIbDYFdi+7d\n 36opGjwnSINmT0Ag=="],"Date":"Tue, 28 Apr 2026 11:11:25 +0200 (CEST)","From":"Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>","To":"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org","Subject":"[PATCH 4/4] Add comment to vect_estimate_min_profitable_iters","MIME-Version":"1.0","Content-Type":"text/plain; charset=US-ASCII","X-Spamd-Result":"default: False [-1.80 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%];\n MISSING_MID(2.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.998];\n NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];\n FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];\n RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];\n DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519];\n TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];\n RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[];\n FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];\n MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]","X-BeenThere":"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org","X-Mailman-Version":"2.1.30","Precedence":"list","List-Id":"Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>","List-Unsubscribe":"<https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,\n <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>","List-Archive":"<https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>","List-Post":"<mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>","List-Help":"<mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>","List-Subscribe":"<https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,\n <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>","Errors-To":"gcc-patches-bounces~incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org","Message-Id":"<20260428091201.E57184BB5899@sourceware.org>"},"content":"The following adds a comment how it's awkward to add the scalar loop\nstmt cost vectors with scaled count to the vector loop cost vector\nto estimate peeling costs.\n\nBootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, pushed.\n\n\t* tree-vect-loop.cc (vect_estimate_min_profitable_iters):\n\tAdd comment about costing of prologue/epilogue.\n---\n gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc | 5 +++++\n 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)","diff":"diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc\nindex 94f3d00d60e..ee540028ba9 100644\n--- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc\n+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc\n@@ -4130,6 +4130,11 @@ vect_estimate_min_profitable_iters (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo,\n \tepilogue_need_br_taken_cost = true;\n     }\n \n+  /* The way we cummulate peeling costs into the vector prologue/epilogue\n+     cost is a bit awkward given we cannot reuse scalar_costs which is\n+     already computed and also because it cannot take into account any\n+     epilogue vectorization we'll carry out in the end.  */\n+\n   stmt_info_for_cost *si;\n   int j;\n   /* Add costs associated with peel_iters_prologue.  */\n","prefixes":["4/4"]}