{"id":2223078,"url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/1.0/patches/2223078/?format=json","project":{"id":17,"url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/1.0/projects/17/?format=json","name":"GNU Compiler Collection","link_name":"gcc","list_id":"gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org","list_email":"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org","web_url":null,"scm_url":null,"webscm_url":null},"msgid":"<20260414111602.4D2654B3FA@imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org>","date":"2026-04-14T11:16:01","name":"middle-end/124877 - fix mis-apply of PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES","commit_ref":null,"pull_url":null,"state":"new","archived":false,"hash":"015efc8eba8b69de2f85269efc628b29a28469e5","submitter":{"id":4338,"url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/1.0/people/4338/?format=json","name":"Richard Biener","email":"rguenther@suse.de"},"delegate":null,"mbox":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/gcc/patch/20260414111602.4D2654B3FA@imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org/mbox/","series":[{"id":499819,"url":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/1.0/series/499819/?format=json","date":"2026-04-14T11:16:01","name":"middle-end/124877 - fix mis-apply of PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES","version":1,"mbox":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/series/499819/mbox/"}],"check":"pending","checks":"http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/patches/2223078/checks/","tags":{},"headers":{"Return-Path":"<gcc-patches-bounces~incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>","X-Original-To":["incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org","gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org"],"Delivered-To":["patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org","gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org"],"Authentication-Results":["legolas.ozlabs.org;\n\tdkim=pass (1024-bit key;\n unprotected) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256\n header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=QrrWJ1az;\n\tdkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256\n header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=1gSQwa9h;\n\tdkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de\n header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=HfBpXd1M;\n\tdkim=neutral header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256\n header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=nqFuXCLL;\n\tdkim-atps=neutral","legolas.ozlabs.org;\n spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org\n (client-ip=2620:52:6:3111::32; helo=vm01.sourceware.org;\n envelope-from=gcc-patches-bounces~incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org;\n receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org)","sourceware.org;\n\tdkim=pass (1024-bit key,\n unprotected) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256\n header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=QrrWJ1az;\n\tdkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256\n header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=1gSQwa9h;\n\tdkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de\n header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=HfBpXd1M;\n\tdkim=neutral header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256\n header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=nqFuXCLL","sourceware.org;\n dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de","sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de","server2.sourceware.org;\n arc=none smtp.remote-ip=195.135.223.130","smtp-out1.suse.de;\n dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=HfBpXd1M;\n dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=nqFuXCLL"],"Received":["from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org\n [IPv6:2620:52:6:3111::32])\n\t(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)\n\t key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384)\n\t(No client certificate requested)\n\tby legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4fw1tq3F0rz1yDF\n\tfor <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2026 21:16:35 +1000 (AEST)","from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])\n\tby sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9414BA23C2\n\tfor <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:16:33 +0000 (GMT)","from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130])\n by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B6674BA5439\n for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:16:04 +0000 (GMT)","from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org\n [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97])\n (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)\n key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest\n SHA256)\n (No client certificate requested)\n by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86E836A8E3;\n Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:16:02 +0000 (UTC)","from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])\n (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)\n key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest\n SHA256)\n (No client certificate requested)\n by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D2654B3FA;\n Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:16:02 +0000 (UTC)","from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167])\n by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id Gs84EfIh3mnWOgAAD6G6ig\n (envelope-from <rguenther@suse.de>); Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:16:02 +0000"],"DKIM-Filter":["OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6A9414BA23C2","OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8B6674BA5439"],"DMARC-Filter":"OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 8B6674BA5439","ARC-Filter":"OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 8B6674BA5439","ARC-Seal":"i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1776165364; cv=none;\n b=CnvedbYwY9rCDMgpMv20vLm7Q4YvP1igM+bwCoxXPExW1UL1edBHd5CvNraDsGry/eV1E3phJZ26+Uv0D+BWPj2Tqe+U0cMWhVd0ZLzX12iWnyFue17SQvFwmkWGi4VgzPssQ27eT4elOzULcAVPIRgnPfWnlv9FBlu81V8t4KA=","ARC-Message-Signature":"i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;\n t=1776165364; c=relaxed/simple;\n bh=2BFddV/esZtcvig5j6lMBs9b7WkXi+aIw+4zaJsVpDA=;\n h=DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:Date:\n From:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Message-Id;\n b=Rmv1Z/fX2ksdub6zrO6MJCr/X+5tMTWhQOJQkhNpwAV780idacp1J0qhONPvijMqkeUk8qMJsNzYXI6C+Wswj/QsIeaGtp4k/yXO+mnCsLwnqOuq+uhDMOT2U+B3dJEAJvOmc920FlilC1PjOfP20GcOrRYJ5iWRrFZ3rtq62Io=","ARC-Authentication-Results":"i=1; server2.sourceware.org","DKIM-Signature":["v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de;\n s=susede2_rsa;\n t=1776165363;\n h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:\n mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type;\n bh=hQdsLbX20ASs9xs+dQCmLN3pLmO1IZLlzfPQWNxnIJs=;\n b=QrrWJ1azfIlkdvqsSiC6hapyNCWTMjSeH0c1CBZ7nzYKXS0anuDJP9cRmIIrWw4lTzfbd7\n LbwIOKK5GzsN4CNQfYQ8RSuzkI5ODkS07fJ+zgiC5CjJRjaX06gugD5sMIsC1gTtyJ1lkh\n w/TwOi7bWizYBFCQ1+/Z70a7DbLdAkE=","v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de;\n s=susede2_ed25519; t=1776165363;\n h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:\n mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type;\n bh=hQdsLbX20ASs9xs+dQCmLN3pLmO1IZLlzfPQWNxnIJs=;\n b=1gSQwa9hgBzyBRL4MASEi/hsM2JgYsBfGWsgxv6Tbnr20l8yXlY7nZcY0UmCXmmemRNOAi\n mSl03q74BSCYEXAA==","v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de;\n s=susede2_rsa;\n t=1776165362;\n h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:\n mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type;\n bh=hQdsLbX20ASs9xs+dQCmLN3pLmO1IZLlzfPQWNxnIJs=;\n b=HfBpXd1M3by01kpG71TeIoXxpxtxIgb/5xFXviUtU7HSsuYhT88zgQbmpTvGUFx8aTSdtQ\n GXYXnR0BXdLnyQBSej2dcfCZzAXYoS4b96V7h8Q3Tl13UfiAqMwEgLAeoxjcYAV9eTKFUp\n x1oqIUWKBzpnBcaBune+JpG1snRVc8I=","v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de;\n s=susede2_ed25519; t=1776165362;\n h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:\n mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type;\n bh=hQdsLbX20ASs9xs+dQCmLN3pLmO1IZLlzfPQWNxnIJs=;\n b=nqFuXCLLewXwFnOIG7WnJ0vQim68RL85M4SRMpVo+l3IBbD3vAVA/syAV1Fj4HngqdrTIN\n jzg3+k72SAgE8jBQ=="],"Date":"Tue, 14 Apr 2026 13:16:01 +0200 (CEST)","From":"Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>","To":"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org","cc":"Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, jeffrey.law@oss.qualcomm.com,\n hjl.tools@gmail.com","Subject":"[PATCH] middle-end/124877 - fix mis-apply of PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES","MIME-Version":"1.0","Content-Type":"multipart/mixed;\n boundary=\"-1463801166-1668255294-1776165362=:295737\"","Message-Id":"<20260414111602.4D2654B3FA@imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org>","X-Spamd-Result":"default: False [-1.91 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%];\n SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000];\n MIME_BASE64_TEXT_BOGUS(1.00)[];\n R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519];\n NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[];\n MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/mixed,text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[];\n TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];\n DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519];\n ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com];\n TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+];\n FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[];\n FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[redhat.com,oss.qualcomm.com,gmail.com];\n RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[];\n FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];\n SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from];\n RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4];\n MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[];\n DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.de:+];\n DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns,\n imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:mid, imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo, suse.de:dkim,\n suse.de:email]","X-Rspamd-Action":"no action","X-Rspamd-Server":"rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org","X-Rspamd-Queue-Id":"86E836A8E3","X-BeenThere":"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org","X-Mailman-Version":"2.1.30","Precedence":"list","List-Id":"Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>","List-Unsubscribe":"<https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,\n <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>","List-Archive":"<https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>","List-Post":"<mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>","List-Help":"<mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>","List-Subscribe":"<https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,\n <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>","Errors-To":"gcc-patches-bounces~incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org"},"content":"The following corrects how we apply PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES during RTL\nexpansion.  The unsignedp field in args info is supposed to\ndenote the signedness of the unpromoted value, but we've set it\nto the signedness of integer_type_node.  So delay adjusting the\ntype until after we compute signedness of the formal argument.\n\nBootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.\n\nThere's two variants, the inline one affects transparent union\npassing, promoting a smaller than int first element, while the\nattached one does not.  This was originally changed for GCC16\nwith r16-169-g78db4753c9646a and r16-170-ga670ebde399548.\n\nOverall this restores behavior to that of GCC 15 before we\nmoved PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES application from frontends to RTL\nexpansion.  GCC 15 did not apply promotion to the transparent\nunion case.\n\nOK for trunk?  Which variant?\n\nThanks,\nRichard.\n\n\tPR middle-end/124877\n\t* calls.cc (initialize_argument_information): Compute\n\tsignedness of the formal argument type before applying\n\tPROMOTE_PROTOTYPES promotion.\n\n\t* gcc.target/i386/pr124877.c: New testcase.\n---\n gcc/calls.cc                             |  9 +++++----\n gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr124877.c | 11 +++++++++++\n 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)\n create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr124877.c","diff":"diff --git a/gcc/calls.cc b/gcc/calls.cc\nindex 337e01065c2..4cdc2361a4b 100644\n--- a/gcc/calls.cc\n+++ b/gcc/calls.cc\n@@ -1396,10 +1396,6 @@ initialize_argument_information (int num_actuals ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,\n       /* Replace erroneous argument with constant zero.  */\n       if (type == error_mark_node || !COMPLETE_TYPE_P (type))\n \targs[i].tree_value = integer_zero_node, type = integer_type_node;\n-      else if (promote_p\n-\t       && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)\n-\t       && TYPE_PRECISION (type) < TYPE_PRECISION (integer_type_node))\n-\ttype = integer_type_node;\n \n       /* If TYPE is a transparent union or record, pass things the way\n \t we would pass the first field of the union or record.  We have\n@@ -1541,6 +1537,11 @@ initialize_argument_information (int num_actuals ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,\n \t}\n \n       unsignedp = TYPE_UNSIGNED (type);\n+      if (promote_p\n+\t  && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)\n+\t  && TYPE_PRECISION (type) < TYPE_PRECISION (integer_type_node))\n+\ttype = integer_type_node;\n+\n       arg.type = type;\n       arg.mode\n \t= promote_function_mode (type, TYPE_MODE (type), &unsignedp,\ndiff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr124877.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr124877.c\nnew file mode 100644\nindex 00000000000..0be0b08d9e8\n--- /dev/null\n+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr124877.c\n@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@\n+/* { dg-do compile } */\n+\n+void bar(unsigned char x);\n+void foo()\n+{\n+  bar(225);\n+}\n+\n+/* PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES should make us pass 225, not -31, both would\n+   be valid according to the ABI.  */\n+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler \"movl\\[ \\t\\]+\\\\\\$225, %edi\" { target { ! ia32 } } } } */\n","prefixes":[]}