From patchwork Tue Feb 5 23:02:58 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Andrew Lunn X-Patchwork-Id: 1037257 X-Patchwork-Delegate: davem@davemloft.net Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming-netdev@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming-netdev@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=209.132.180.67; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="P+PnQrfC"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43vKqz0J6gz9s6w for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 10:03:26 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727739AbfBEXDY (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2019 18:03:24 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:40245 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726624AbfBEXDY (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2019 18:03:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:MIME-Version :Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=3Bw1S/IXvBSgsNAUY4DyK0hPHzarLXsjzGF59dh/6Ts=; b=P+PnQrfC8KZRVHC3k6p4+qW1Xq SGTOOwfQ9lxf4fK9Syv4mSIgbTo4WnK0gX8+zC+PBdw4ItLpXxT59cRN4KKGI59BU0oQPhbh3swmS 8bzMe7X7Aj0QS9Qy7I+5BXt1vxpXZX7ucR73It8YUHNmLL73jM0FMYf4xypcecFoQ0bQ=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gr9k8-0005M4-5x; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:03:04 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: David Miller Cc: netdev , Florian Fainelli , Andrew Lunn Subject: [PATCH net] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Fix counting of ATU violations Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 00:02:58 +0100 Message-Id: <20190205230258.20543-1-andrew@lunn.ch> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org The ATU port vector contains a bit per port of the switch. The code wrongly used it as a port number, and incremented a port counter. This resulted in the wrong interfaces counter being incremented, and potentially going off the end of the array of ports. Fix this by using the source port ID for the violation, which really is a port number. Reported-by: Chris Healy Tested-by: Chris Healy Fixes: 65f60e4582bd ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Keep ATU/VTU violation statistics") Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot --- drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c | 21 ++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c index 5200e4bdce93..ea243840ee0f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c @@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ static irqreturn_t mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_prob_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id) { struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip = dev_id; struct mv88e6xxx_atu_entry entry; + int spid; int err; u16 val; @@ -336,6 +337,8 @@ static irqreturn_t mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_prob_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id) if (err) goto out; + spid = entry.state; + if (val & MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_OP_AGE_OUT_VIOLATION) { dev_err_ratelimited(chip->dev, "ATU age out violation for %pM\n", @@ -344,23 +347,23 @@ static irqreturn_t mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_prob_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id) if (val & MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_OP_MEMBER_VIOLATION) { dev_err_ratelimited(chip->dev, - "ATU member violation for %pM portvec %x\n", - entry.mac, entry.portvec); - chip->ports[entry.portvec].atu_member_violation++; + "ATU member violation for %pM portvec %x spid %d\n", + entry.mac, entry.portvec, spid); + chip->ports[spid].atu_member_violation++; } if (val & MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_OP_MISS_VIOLATION) { dev_err_ratelimited(chip->dev, - "ATU miss violation for %pM portvec %x\n", - entry.mac, entry.portvec); - chip->ports[entry.portvec].atu_miss_violation++; + "ATU miss violation for %pM portvec %x spid %d\n", + entry.mac, entry.portvec, spid); + chip->ports[spid].atu_miss_violation++; } if (val & MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_OP_FULL_VIOLATION) { dev_err_ratelimited(chip->dev, - "ATU full violation for %pM portvec %x\n", - entry.mac, entry.portvec); - chip->ports[entry.portvec].atu_full_violation++; + "ATU full violation for %pM portvec %x spid %d\n", + entry.mac, entry.portvec, spid); + chip->ports[spid].atu_full_violation++; } mutex_unlock(&chip->reg_lock);