From patchwork Thu Aug 9 15:21:08 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thomas Preudhomme X-Patchwork-Id: 955709 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org (client-ip=209.132.180.131; helo=sourceware.org; envelope-from=gcc-patches-return-483462-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.b="Nlu9BC12"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="IlbeGSep"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41mX6468Lkz9ryt for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 01:21:31 +1000 (AEST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender :mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; q= dns; s=default; b=Xg25usZ9txKV/1EOaOaCyCpjWlCWEubD4ypEzt5lB/L9gl QNUg3CRwNb2cmD+fbHTJQCiNHk+/Hg8lZLGmaRd+jhW9//LTBHSYOTP1KeB+zLR7 wJ5hUlSJkQUO7bryi8BunZ13TdcvtbaD1I8BMPXJb1SPlDUtF1Sjzwe4JAw6w= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender :mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; s= default; bh=YZtKo+HVk8eaocaB7JMKh008vCc=; b=Nlu9BC121iriI7t9JJC9 bGJzGyehPCaCAtnqeBTHoEFPl32eUTuPS4JCzK3rcioophPIHEMFG6CupO2ft/HA 62YKqA3oFx7vZa17ohPxIavZK1jdOKtXd/4pClcri6Obl06X7PzhNSeBeaI9ROIB VHPkL/Udv06qyISTf4p5oxo= Received: (qmail 42858 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2018 15:21:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 42834 invoked by uid 89); 9 Aug 2018 15:21:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-25.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_0, GIT_PATCH_1, GIT_PATCH_2, GIT_PATCH_3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*Ad:U*aoliva, HTo:U*aoliva, HX-Received:sk:h2-v6mr, HTo:U*neroden X-HELO: mail-it0-f48.google.com Received: from mail-it0-f48.google.com (HELO mail-it0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 15:21:21 +0000 Received: by mail-it0-f48.google.com with SMTP id d9-v6so765277itf.2 for ; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 08:21:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6a+LAGLYnQWQ9RepOPe5lViT2pel5PP7jkOnQCOmF7U=; b=IlbeGSepoO40vZ1N9nURVMXFLpalfk7ti1vdUlh7w+qEPf3ZvOn+zL45Nw1siVfgc3 nsI6Xj6/MN98grdWCo+JCPJ0PusYQfjRLVcaFm4VovHF2NJK4l8Hy3BkUjQq1LVVtHMM ecZYNsn3ifi80c6q3v4ocN/RAGFmlL0Ew/gPY= MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Thomas Preudhomme Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 16:21:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: [PATCH] Clarify source of tm.texi to copy for GFDL grant To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Nathanael Nerode , Alexandre Oliva , Ralf Wildenhues X-IsSubscribed: yes When tm.texi.in is updated in the source tree, the following message gets displayed: Verify that you have permission to grant a GFDL license for all new text in tm.texi, then copy it to /gcc/doc/tm.texi. Having been myself and some colleagues confused several time by that message as to what tm.texi to copy, I think it would be clearer to indicate the absolute path for the source as well. This patch achieves that. ChangeLog entry is as follows: *** gcc/ChangeLog *** 2018-08-09 Thomas Preud'homme * Makefile.in: Clarify which tm.texi to copy over to assert the right to grant a GFDL license for all. Testing: Built GCC with a change in tm.texi.in and copied by copy/pasting the source and destination path from the resulting message. Second build then succeeded. Is this ok for trunk? Best regards, Thomas diff --git a/gcc/Makefile.in b/gcc/Makefile.in index e7d818d174c..d8d2b885f6d 100644 --- a/gcc/Makefile.in +++ b/gcc/Makefile.in @@ -2504,7 +2504,7 @@ s-tm-texi: build/genhooks$(build_exeext) $(srcdir)/doc/tm.texi.in else \ echo >&2 ; \ echo Verify that you have permission to grant a GFDL license for all >&2 ; \ - echo new text in tm.texi, then copy it to $(srcdir)/doc/tm.texi. >&2 ; \ + echo new text in $(objdir)/tm.texi, then copy it to $(srcdir)/doc/tm.texi. >&2 ; \ false; \ fi -- 2.18.0