From patchwork Mon Mar 25 17:16:25 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Andy Shevchenko X-Patchwork-Id: 1915788 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=VK6jjGhG; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=147.75.199.223; helo=ny.mirrors.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-gpio+bounces-4622-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@vger.kernel.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org [147.75.199.223]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4V3LHP0QTcz1yXy for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 04:57:21 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 096A31C2F956 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:57:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC1174425; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="VK6jjGhG" X-Original-To: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 368334EB5F; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:18:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711387093; cv=none; b=ft7gwenObrp7e/POtzUsgfOW7ZK50gtHqcN/aZpofxTauhWNqyDny38LEEGkmXYkd9eoa3UFke4FRUERi3dTRG/FUZVUQeggREP/IpBch2YJmkysZdMknjYc03qVj2K4qMVCFp//9DDAneKcfVr50VssQbulRxy3GLT5dfTX81E= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711387093; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rVysmY2hoDOfSR8Roev4MtIq14Q/G7Fv9ugKPFwvn80=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=XAy2XubkRbsFpIEIMKQD3ckPQVKbM6dMD+BWSmxm8QXsccqILJ08OV4SlwVEfFG76bM2gwbJVzu5QExJvY/5zwI1gFTL9jqLAYcbtsN1He2NVvu/CJQNSoTkZ3z8sCL/isCK/wHOOjCqGuDP5fAAuQPdqsl/9XokA2eKSzez+yE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=VK6jjGhG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1711387092; x=1742923092; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rVysmY2hoDOfSR8Roev4MtIq14Q/G7Fv9ugKPFwvn80=; b=VK6jjGhGaxvSl6rInAV9X8fXuPIv9ApA4lcmkMGLzjLA8UNKT8ukUAb2 s1Z+ff0+N6x8D/kwYIbiSaH1VeVeLxA2Mdx9/J8Ti4DYWBJ9L9XencSjb peRcM47Fxoh4gbSn6qksXcTzujeyYvSTsUP63sK60vyLqLsFdjmzyuYwp zovN4OKzCyPMFsYY7gWyDDA2NrDbg4J9dVfamfeWFQ3bKbgtooJspGfY2 zxYhZqUSF7QWOMkJ4lu6YtrleLUMXhZVBCEEnbHZKvR4RZCbvu9uQ65Bu nzjtSbda5HgYKFiPSuNlWGHcLmCBHsp7hAxZvqAeqztVA8rreRTxV75/A w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11024"; a="17546547" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,153,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="17546547" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orvoesa105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Mar 2024 10:18:09 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11024"; a="937070691" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,153,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="937070691" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Mar 2024 10:18:06 -0700 Received: by black.fi.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id A5DFF484; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:18:05 +0200 (EET) From: Andy Shevchenko To: Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Andy Shevchenko , Ferry Toth , Dmitry Torokhov Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] gpiolib: Fix debug messaging in gpiod_find_and_request() Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:16:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20240325171804.3375280-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0.rc1.1.gbec44491f096 In-Reply-To: <20240325171804.3375280-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> References: <20240325171804.3375280-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 When consolidating GPIO lookups in ACPI code, the debug messaging had been reworked that the user may see [ 13.401147] (NULL device *): using ACPI '\_SB.LEDS.led-0' for '(null)' GPIO lookup [ 13.401378] gpio gpiochip0: Persistence not supported for GPIO 40 [ 13.401402] gpio-40 (?): no flags found for (null) instead of [ 14.182962] gpio gpiochip0: Persistence not supported for GPIO 40 [ 14.182994] gpio-40 (?): no flags found for gpios The '(null)' parts are less informative and likely scare the users. Replace them by '(default)' which can point out to the default connection IDs, such as 'gpios'. While at it, amend other places where con_id is used in the messages. Reported-by: Ferry Toth Fixes: 8eb1f71e7acc ("gpiolib: consolidate GPIO lookups") Suggested-by: Dmitry Torokhov Tested-by: Ferry Toth Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c index 06f6c84fc7b1..b98cbf4335e3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -2396,6 +2396,11 @@ char *gpiochip_dup_line_label(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_dup_line_label); +static inline const char *function_name_or_default(const char *con_id) +{ + return con_id ?: "(default)"; +} + /** * gpiochip_request_own_desc - Allow GPIO chip to request its own descriptor * @gc: GPIO chip @@ -2424,10 +2429,11 @@ struct gpio_desc *gpiochip_request_own_desc(struct gpio_chip *gc, enum gpiod_flags dflags) { struct gpio_desc *desc = gpiochip_get_desc(gc, hwnum); + const char *name = function_name_or_default(label); int ret; if (IS_ERR(desc)) { - chip_err(gc, "failed to get GPIO descriptor\n"); + chip_err(gc, "failed to get GPIO %s descriptor\n", name); return desc; } @@ -2437,8 +2443,8 @@ struct gpio_desc *gpiochip_request_own_desc(struct gpio_chip *gc, ret = gpiod_configure_flags(desc, label, lflags, dflags); if (ret) { - chip_err(gc, "setup of own GPIO %s failed\n", label); gpiod_free_commit(desc); + chip_err(gc, "setup of own GPIO %s failed\n", name); return ERR_PTR(ret); } @@ -4152,19 +4158,17 @@ static struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find_by_fwnode(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, enum gpiod_flags *flags, unsigned long *lookupflags) { + const char *name = function_name_or_default(con_id); struct gpio_desc *desc = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT); if (is_of_node(fwnode)) { - dev_dbg(consumer, "using DT '%pfw' for '%s' GPIO lookup\n", - fwnode, con_id); + dev_dbg(consumer, "using DT '%pfw' for '%s' GPIO lookup\n", fwnode, name); desc = of_find_gpio(to_of_node(fwnode), con_id, idx, lookupflags); } else if (is_acpi_node(fwnode)) { - dev_dbg(consumer, "using ACPI '%pfw' for '%s' GPIO lookup\n", - fwnode, con_id); + dev_dbg(consumer, "using ACPI '%pfw' for '%s' GPIO lookup\n", fwnode, name); desc = acpi_find_gpio(fwnode, con_id, idx, flags, lookupflags); } else if (is_software_node(fwnode)) { - dev_dbg(consumer, "using swnode '%pfw' for '%s' GPIO lookup\n", - fwnode, con_id); + dev_dbg(consumer, "using swnode '%pfw' for '%s' GPIO lookup\n", fwnode, name); desc = swnode_find_gpio(fwnode, con_id, idx, lookupflags); } @@ -4180,6 +4184,7 @@ struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find_and_request(struct device *consumer, bool platform_lookup_allowed) { unsigned long lookupflags = GPIO_LOOKUP_FLAGS_DEFAULT; + const char *name = function_name_or_default(con_id); /* * scoped_guard() is implemented as a for loop, meaning static * analyzers will complain about these two not being initialized. @@ -4202,8 +4207,7 @@ struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find_and_request(struct device *consumer, } if (IS_ERR(desc)) { - dev_dbg(consumer, "No GPIO consumer %s found\n", - con_id); + dev_dbg(consumer, "No GPIO consumer %s found\n", name); return desc; } @@ -4225,15 +4229,14 @@ struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find_and_request(struct device *consumer, * * FIXME: Make this more sane and safe. */ - dev_info(consumer, - "nonexclusive access to GPIO for %s\n", con_id); + dev_info(consumer, "nonexclusive access to GPIO for %s\n", name); return desc; } ret = gpiod_configure_flags(desc, con_id, lookupflags, flags); if (ret < 0) { - dev_dbg(consumer, "setup of GPIO %s failed\n", con_id); gpiod_put(desc); + dev_dbg(consumer, "setup of GPIO %s failed\n", name); return ERR_PTR(ret); } @@ -4349,6 +4352,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_get_optional); int gpiod_configure_flags(struct gpio_desc *desc, const char *con_id, unsigned long lflags, enum gpiod_flags dflags) { + const char *name = function_name_or_default(con_id); int ret; if (lflags & GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW) @@ -4392,7 +4396,7 @@ int gpiod_configure_flags(struct gpio_desc *desc, const char *con_id, /* No particular flag request, return here... */ if (!(dflags & GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_DIR_SET)) { - gpiod_dbg(desc, "no flags found for %s\n", con_id); + gpiod_dbg(desc, "no flags found for GPIO %s\n", name); return 0; } From patchwork Mon Mar 25 17:16:26 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Andy Shevchenko X-Patchwork-Id: 1915787 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=bwUsFYHl; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3; helo=am.mirrors.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-gpio+bounces-4621-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@vger.kernel.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4V3LHH2cT6z1yXy for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 04:57:15 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B0FA1F67030 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630B86AFB5; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:18:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="bwUsFYHl" X-Original-To: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C145A4E1AD; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:18:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711387092; cv=none; b=lSpp0CreSi+JvUAE7SshUlXwthrKBNlE7LQaJfZAuhC/c7xlTEBM06/IZQMfqi1fPoLiKfJR/PnknW/98D24VuaIY3JsmTCWKmkLyYDYKNl0maLcCSz562F5JakvPEF5aFnbWCm5pN32vuh1yd98yY7xQi+3vt6ZNm6oPyspM1Q= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711387092; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EsZ7DYs0uLdg3p61Jl6f297OkczXhJruCuaScJCVEqg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=T2yEgbFsEk84jWM6ADMYs2WKx7qdz9F3MsOEE/VQDrJVm9vXEwKvpc69cjEYLKqZvQHDNTuaViGwWfFEDAaamSz61vdgRuJ+7R7ohZMQ6xb63I8hPFRWc57d7SK29IhQhZ5y1aLNmqKA/RhL1XF1+Y8YZz47Wu8vzJo591frVc8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=bwUsFYHl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1711387091; x=1742923091; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EsZ7DYs0uLdg3p61Jl6f297OkczXhJruCuaScJCVEqg=; b=bwUsFYHlVTgzNNbnaE6LNBA68zTwD6emZF6PjrImtJ/jgwvR6q5aWrzc rXcsW3eEbOcOG8vn4OngXjHdB205jXsMHULJD7MvqrJrojN4Dh9rBf0lu UVCgGMV+fHEJKqsRtWJBYXH2ynwxbKiVDKzUl/dnjxUo5lYdtf/6LT+gN IawXSF91HGaQB4nn8WW9u2EdQkI1hcak0alpQXNpnTsUBnptl6GTQloOa ozNIvTyN85Wwp4vOu703YpjqgS0UPaW1dv97QNRvlpGaFYLaPOosWgUtA twBgSqA7hF7wPvKj305/UtWS7SdAv+RULTK01RPpE/kfRMYaWX+lOIjcu A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11024"; a="17546542" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,153,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="17546542" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orvoesa105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Mar 2024 10:18:09 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11024"; a="937070689" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,153,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="937070689" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Mar 2024 10:18:06 -0700 Received: by black.fi.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id BA569643; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:18:05 +0200 (EET) From: Andy Shevchenko To: Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Peng Fan , Andy Shevchenko Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] gpiolib: use dev_err() when gpiod_configure_flags failed Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:16:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20240325171804.3375280-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0.rc1.1.gbec44491f096 In-Reply-To: <20240325171804.3375280-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> References: <20240325171804.3375280-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Peng Fan When gpio-ranges property was missed to be added in the gpio node, using dev_err() to show an error message will helping to locate issues easier. Signed-off-by: Peng Fan Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c index b98cbf4335e3..5589e085ba25 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -4236,7 +4236,7 @@ struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find_and_request(struct device *consumer, ret = gpiod_configure_flags(desc, con_id, lookupflags, flags); if (ret < 0) { gpiod_put(desc); - dev_dbg(consumer, "setup of GPIO %s failed\n", name); + dev_err(consumer, "setup of GPIO %s failed: %d\n", name, ret); return ERR_PTR(ret); }