From patchwork Mon Jan 9 22:56:43 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?b?6ZKf5bGF5ZOy?= X-Patchwork-Id: 1723748 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org (client-ip=8.43.85.97; helo=sourceware.org; envelope-from=gcc-patches-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org; receiver=) Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NrTpp1GPcz23gB for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 09:57:05 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F033E3858020 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 22:57:02 +0000 (GMT) X-Original-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from smtpbgjp3.qq.com (smtpbgjp3.qq.com [54.92.39.34]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAD3E385842E for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 22:56:49 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org EAD3E385842E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivai.ai Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivai.ai X-QQ-mid: bizesmtp72t1673305005ts9oaqf3 Received: from server1.localdomain ( [58.60.1.22]) by bizesmtp.qq.com (ESMTP) with id ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 06:56:45 +0800 (CST) X-QQ-SSF: 01400000002000E0L000B00A0000000 X-QQ-FEAT: o+V1LJLjbvyH96XcH5z0d02tB1ZBuz7pCMhacyNiJgb8cWf0fNzX6TVjTockM GYgI9Jyu+y8FPQ0FjN8PATeelMop7x989kqFHsNQvYqWscsruQ5x3+XHwfdcLnG250SYrCI 0AI2odsSDqZHJzdY3Of0w6QTMkD++jRUGe50MvX33HB2IsI1tmCoiJzIdu7DEDEWW6NghAi s4uE+ryL+L/B5jrjgfpmmX8iqLua6Ld6qMiQD+Wi3F47RyhzWLqIgRMZWnSdUIdD2q+C4O+ c/JZAcbFpbf5f5LdSmjATJMjuPBM2s18oyxCX1vq3O+rVsgYuihDLWHggPI7vp6cmri6ayj FFoycnVkwP6YQMFE79nVTlESQGWA4xRYhvsF8C4b/LaaXlLMjGJ8AfmcfGbm7kCY2h3o7Z2 X-QQ-GoodBg: 2 From: juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: kito.cheng@gmail.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, Ju-Zhe Zhong Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Rename insn into rinsn for rtx_insn * Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 06:56:43 +0800 Message-Id: <20230109225643.150853-1-juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.36.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520 Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:rivai.ai:qybglogicsvr:qybglogicsvr7 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_0, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gcc-patches-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org Sender: "Gcc-patches" From: Ju-Zhe Zhong Since the PASS is implemented base on RTL_SSA framework. According to rtl_ssa, they name insn_info * as insn and name rtx_insn * rinsn. I follow this rule in this pass but I missed this function. So rename it to make codes be consistent to RTL_SSA framework. gcc/ChangeLog: * config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc (add_label_notes): --- gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc index a972c49561a..3c920779992 100644 --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc @@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ insert_vsetvl (enum emit_type emit_type, rtx_insn *rinsn, necessary REG_LABEL_OPERAND and REG_LABEL_TARGET notes. */ static void -add_label_notes (rtx x, rtx_insn *insn) +add_label_notes (rtx x, rtx_insn *rinsn) { enum rtx_code code = GET_CODE (x); int i, j; @@ -699,8 +699,8 @@ add_label_notes (rtx x, rtx_insn *insn) /* There's no reason for current users to emit jump-insns with such a LABEL_REF, so we don't have to handle REG_LABEL_TARGET notes. */ - gcc_assert (!JUMP_P (insn)); - add_reg_note (insn, REG_LABEL_OPERAND, label_ref_label (x)); + gcc_assert (!JUMP_P (rinsn)); + add_reg_note (rinsn, REG_LABEL_OPERAND, label_ref_label (x)); if (LABEL_P (label_ref_label (x))) LABEL_NUSES (label_ref_label (x))++; @@ -711,10 +711,10 @@ add_label_notes (rtx x, rtx_insn *insn) for (i = GET_RTX_LENGTH (code) - 1, fmt = GET_RTX_FORMAT (code); i >= 0; i--) { if (fmt[i] == 'e') - add_label_notes (XEXP (x, i), insn); + add_label_notes (XEXP (x, i), rinsn); else if (fmt[i] == 'E') for (j = XVECLEN (x, i) - 1; j >= 0; j--) - add_label_notes (XVECEXP (x, i, j), insn); + add_label_notes (XVECEXP (x, i, j), rinsn); } }