From patchwork Fri Dec 2 09:23:45 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Alexandre Oliva X-Patchwork-Id: 1711329 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org (client-ip=2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c; helo=sourceware.org; envelope-from=gcc-patches-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=vb+7VLcm; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [IPv6:2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NNnZT2zlBz23nB for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 20:24:16 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A55385841E for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 09:24:14 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 15A55385841E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1669973054; bh=nTpJAIGvgfKKZX/v22zSdlrVkBxtkVWW27E4/J/eejw=; h=To:Cc:Subject:Date:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:From; b=vb+7VLcme4YxfTPP9Mk5v5qPGBJoPwzI/DEiq5p4miwc1GjPB+2w4UMamCarq1xUQ H4p07tVavhkwtpyKENZcEn59oJFCAaffmVeDocEGAln4GXDATvudVQo4WW7FjesmJM CGXI5tQ7oTm/ykb9N3wWrPdJUnjhmVfPuznRVCz4= X-Original-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (rock.gnat.com [IPv6:2620:20:4000:0:a9e:1ff:fe9b:1d1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 919383858C2F for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 09:23:54 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 919383858C2F Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBDA116B25; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 04:23:54 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id idsLY61HXrg8; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 04:23:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from free.home (tron.gnat.com [IPv6:2620:20:4000:0:46a8:42ff:fe0e:e294]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7157116B1E; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 04:23:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from livre (livre.home [172.31.160.2]) by free.home (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 2B29Nj6E1291198 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 2 Dec 2022 06:23:46 -0300 To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Rainer Orth , Mike Stump Subject: [PATCH] [testsuite] [riscv] skip ssa-sink-18.c Organization: Free thinker, does not speak for AdaCore Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 06:23:45 -0300 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_0, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Patchwork-Original-From: Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches From: Alexandre Oliva Reply-To: Alexandre Oliva Errors-To: gcc-patches-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org Sender: "Gcc-patches" On riscv64, despite being lp64, we choose two IV candidates as on arm, which prevents some of the expected sinking. Add an xfail for it. Regstraped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested with crosses to riscv64-elf and arm-eabi. Ok to install? for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c: xfail sink2 on riscv64. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c index 421c78eba50f8..9ac0fc6e4de55 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c @@ -207,6 +207,9 @@ compute_on_bytes (uint8_t *in_data, int in_len, uint8_t *out_data, int out_len) from bb 31 to bb 33" When -m32, Power and X86 will sink 3 instructions, but arm ilp32 couldn't sink due to ivopts chooses two IV candidates instead of one, which is - expected, so this case is restricted to lp64 only so far. */ + expected, so this case is restricted to lp64 only so far. This different + ivopts choice affects riscv64 as well, probably because it also lacks + base+index addressing modes, so the ip[len] address computation can't be + made from the IV computation above. */ - /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Sunk statements: 4" 1 "sink2" { target lp64 } } } */ + /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Sunk statements: 4" 1 "sink2" { target lp64 xfail { riscv64-*-* } } } } */