From patchwork Sat May 7 12:14:13 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Shengjiu Wang X-Patchwork-Id: 1627918 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KwRWD5Q4cz9s2R for ; Sat, 7 May 2022 22:26:32 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KwRWD2LSHz3cFR for ; Sat, 7 May 2022 22:26:32 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nxp.com (client-ip=92.121.34.21; helo=inva021.nxp.com; envelope-from=shengjiu.wang@nxp.com; receiver=) Received: from inva021.nxp.com (inva021.nxp.com [92.121.34.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KwRW301mQz3byl for ; Sat, 7 May 2022 22:26:21 +1000 (AEST) Received: from inva021.nxp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by inva021.eu-rdc02.nxp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3639200284; Sat, 7 May 2022 14:26:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from aprdc01srsp001v.ap-rdc01.nxp.com (aprdc01srsp001v.ap-rdc01.nxp.com [165.114.16.16]) by inva021.eu-rdc02.nxp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C55D2007C8; Sat, 7 May 2022 14:26:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (shlinux2.ap.freescale.net [10.192.224.44]) by aprdc01srsp001v.ap-rdc01.nxp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2096D180031B; Sat, 7 May 2022 20:26:16 +0800 (+08) From: Shengjiu Wang To: nicoleotsuka@gmail.com, Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, festevam@gmail.com, shengjiu.wang@gmail.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ASoc: fsl_micfil: explicitly clear software reset bit Date: Sat, 7 May 2022 20:14:13 +0800 Message-Id: <1651925654-32060-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" SRES is self-cleared bit, but REG_MICFIL_CTRL1 is defined as non volatile register, it still remain in regmap cache after set, then every update of REG_MICFIL_CTRL1, software reset happens. to avoid this, clear it explicitly. Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang --- sound/soc/fsl/fsl_micfil.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_micfil.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_micfil.c index cd85c8714f97..2149fac0dcc6 100644 --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_micfil.c +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_micfil.c @@ -179,6 +179,17 @@ static int fsl_micfil_reset(struct device *dev) if (ret) return ret; + /* + * SRES is self-cleared bit, but REG_MICFIL_CTRL1 is defined + * as non-volatile register, so SRES still remain in regmap + * cache after set, that every update of REG_MICFIL_CTRL1, + * software reset happens. so clear it explicitly. + */ + ret = regmap_clear_bits(micfil->regmap, REG_MICFIL_CTRL1, + MICFIL_CTRL1_SRES); + if (ret) + return ret; + return 0; } From patchwork Sat May 7 12:14:14 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Shengjiu Wang X-Patchwork-Id: 1627919 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KwRWf306Qz9s2R for ; Sat, 7 May 2022 22:26:54 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KwRWf1wkyz3cRW for ; Sat, 7 May 2022 22:26:54 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nxp.com (client-ip=92.121.34.13; helo=inva020.nxp.com; envelope-from=shengjiu.wang@nxp.com; receiver=) Received: from inva020.nxp.com (inva020.nxp.com [92.121.34.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KwRW30PTtz3c1K for ; Sat, 7 May 2022 22:26:22 +1000 (AEST) Received: from inva020.nxp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by inva020.eu-rdc02.nxp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5BAB1A07E0; Sat, 7 May 2022 14:26:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from aprdc01srsp001v.ap-rdc01.nxp.com (aprdc01srsp001v.ap-rdc01.nxp.com [165.114.16.16]) by inva020.eu-rdc02.nxp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B7B1A07DC; Sat, 7 May 2022 14:26:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (shlinux2.ap.freescale.net [10.192.224.44]) by aprdc01srsp001v.ap-rdc01.nxp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29469180031D; Sat, 7 May 2022 20:26:17 +0800 (+08) From: Shengjiu Wang To: nicoleotsuka@gmail.com, Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, festevam@gmail.com, shengjiu.wang@gmail.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ASoc: fsl_micfil: explicitly clear CHnF flags Date: Sat, 7 May 2022 20:14:14 +0800 Message-Id: <1651925654-32060-2-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1651925654-32060-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> References: <1651925654-32060-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" There may be failure when start 1 channel recording after 8 channels recording. The reason is that the CHnF flags are not cleared successfully by software reset. This issue is triggerred by the change of clearing software reset bit. CHnF flags are write 1 clear bits. Clear them by force write. Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang --- sound/soc/fsl/fsl_micfil.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_micfil.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_micfil.c index 2149fac0dcc6..e4d1da55293e 100644 --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_micfil.c +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_micfil.c @@ -190,6 +190,14 @@ static int fsl_micfil_reset(struct device *dev) if (ret) return ret; + /* + * Set SRES should clear CHnF flags, But even add delay here + * the CHnF may not be cleared sometimes, so clear CHnF explicitly. + */ + ret = regmap_write_bits(micfil->regmap, REG_MICFIL_STAT, 0xFF, 0xFF); + if (ret) + return ret; + return 0; }