From patchwork Thu Feb 25 21:50:53 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tyrel Datwyler X-Patchwork-Id: 1444641 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=jO2U+dql; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DmmhH22Nlz9s1l for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:51:27 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DmmhH10Ndz3d47 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:51:27 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=jO2U+dql; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=tyreld@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=jO2U+dql; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Dmmgs5mgmz3cYk for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:51:05 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11PLY8bR090122; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:51:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=nILnawZBkXgE9K7dLnpbGy1lY+tttA4o0oEurj3Me0Q=; b=jO2U+dql85EMh2TcWESwTRZNE8AaNZCqLEFe7DwBxfoJakISrREWumakQHGpXkM65jIV nclTgnaU7icdqa8py5jMqH394VlehWFuZPhgAs3wPWmweBHNGY80JOSUjaiTSkNpdHzb zm3WDk0wy216E49rhi5JhoURnO1k8aLu5iEHsHjyZxK68s5V3uYYGlbWbhaoRm73+Pit AzrgVUU1OWfUX4EcuzlbkM1tvWsCjxyq36LgaURvXhgGt4gFPXXjq0KQv8M5UhXetfEh ZIV9kH9BYzICV+5hnoTkFl+QnEIKBL7LdTqNnNAlXt7CAk9hB8RGf98OkPePQkl9wuCJ WA== Received: from ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (fd.55.37a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.55.85.253]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36xh8jw3tn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:51:01 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 11PLmYGe018707; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:51:00 GMT Received: from b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.15]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 36tt29hvw6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:51:00 +0000 Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.232]) by b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 11PLoxCU24641830 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:50:59 GMT Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169E36E050; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:50:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC40D6E04C; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:50:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vios4361.aus.stglabs.ibm.com (unknown [9.3.43.61]) by b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:50:58 +0000 (GMT) From: Tyrel Datwyler To: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] ibmvfc: simplify handling of sub-CRQ initialization Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:50:53 -0600 Message-Id: <20210225215057.23020-2-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20210225215057.23020-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> References: <20210225215057.23020-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-02-25_14:2021-02-24, 2021-02-25 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102250163 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tyrel Datwyler , martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, brking@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" If ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs() fails ibmvfc_probe() simply parrots registration failure reported elsewhere, and futher vhost->scsi_scrq.scrq == NULL is indication enough to the driver that it has no sub-CRQs available. The mq_enabled check can also be moved into ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs() such that each caller doesn't have to gate the call with a mq_enabled check. Finally, in the case of sub-CRQ setup failure setting do_enquiry can be turned off to putting the driver into single queue fallback mode. The aforementioned changes also simplify the next patch in the series that fixes a hard reset issue, by tying a sub-CRQ setup failure and do_enquiry logic into ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(). Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler Reviewed-by: Brian King --- drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 21 ++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c index 7097028d4cb6..384960036f8b 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c @@ -5705,17 +5705,21 @@ static void ibmvfc_deregister_scsi_channel(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost, int index) LEAVE; } -static int ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost) +static void ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost) { int i, j; ENTER; + if (!vhost->mq_enabled) + return; vhost->scsi_scrqs.scrqs = kcalloc(nr_scsi_hw_queues, sizeof(*vhost->scsi_scrqs.scrqs), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!vhost->scsi_scrqs.scrqs) - return -1; + if (!vhost->scsi_scrqs.scrqs) { + vhost->do_enquiry = 0; + return; + } for (i = 0; i < nr_scsi_hw_queues; i++) { if (ibmvfc_register_scsi_channel(vhost, i)) { @@ -5724,13 +5728,12 @@ static int ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost) kfree(vhost->scsi_scrqs.scrqs); vhost->scsi_scrqs.scrqs = NULL; vhost->scsi_scrqs.active_queues = 0; - LEAVE; - return -1; + vhost->do_enquiry = 0; + break; } } LEAVE; - return 0; } static void ibmvfc_release_sub_crqs(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost) @@ -5997,11 +6000,7 @@ static int ibmvfc_probe(struct vio_dev *vdev, const struct vio_device_id *id) goto remove_shost; } - if (vhost->mq_enabled) { - rc = ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(vhost); - if (rc) - dev_warn(dev, "Failed to allocate Sub-CRQs. rc=%d\n", rc); - } + ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(vhost); if (shost_to_fc_host(shost)->rqst_q) blk_queue_max_segments(shost_to_fc_host(shost)->rqst_q, 1); From patchwork Thu Feb 25 21:50:54 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tyrel Datwyler X-Patchwork-Id: 1444646 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=Bq02OW1B; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Dmmkd2TKlz9sCD for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:53:29 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Dmmkd1Rmqz3dDl for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:53:29 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=Bq02OW1B; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=tyreld@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=Bq02OW1B; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Dmmgv1DMPz3cYr for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:51:05 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11PLWqZu090842; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:51:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=vsu/9LvA8vu2SG4EBzcOmhCz/Tz5x97vI0SkMtBQdIw=; b=Bq02OW1B3TyQAmpw0puWNgnXKPUOixMJj14lfsBarVNv1lYPvdtyRqgy5JC9RYLZ12y3 5wIdtdj0gZc6aStcmAXqmpa6GIwxCgBvmhptz4Zui+mkYJDpaJAqHULk0tVw5l78OQiA IedJcwe/S8DrBbpGTvg/P+U1gEALV3SktiW6N/KGJ2HJIA+pIudgZMIDIvLdYdrjNCqQ TGT6aOz8T4Rcwf4Ty17Lb9nNqWOVUcmenJSxx8dO9T/gs68I/f1ZB00gaPYH87a/k82p iuJeOFz5UTEpBLCGdSYk04BGoz2IKi/jYx5LCIuBQvges0OJuxQHj9NXsDVuPrpHlS2n vg== Received: from ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (7a.29.35a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.53.41.122]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36xf2v0pc3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:51:02 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 11PLmRHA000860; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:51:01 GMT Received: from b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.15]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 36tt2b494f-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:51:01 +0000 Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.232]) by b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 11PLoxEC24641834 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:50:59 GMT Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76AF96E04C; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:50:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3B76E052; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:50:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vios4361.aus.stglabs.ibm.com (unknown [9.3.43.61]) by b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:50:59 +0000 (GMT) From: Tyrel Datwyler To: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com Subject: [PATCH v4 2/5] ibmvfc: fix invalid sub-CRQ handles after hard reset Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:50:54 -0600 Message-Id: <20210225215057.23020-3-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20210225215057.23020-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> References: <20210225215057.23020-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-02-25_14:2021-02-24, 2021-02-25 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102250163 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tyrel Datwyler , martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, brking@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" A hard reset results in a complete transport disconnect such that the CRQ connection with the partner VIOS is broken. This has the side effect of also invalidating the associated sub-CRQs. The current code assumes that the sub-CRQs are perserved resulting in a protocol violation after trying to reconnect them with the VIOS. This introduces an infinite loop such that the VIOS forces a disconnect after each subsequent attempt to re-register with invalid handles. Avoid the aforementioned issue by releasing the sub-CRQs prior to CRQ disconnect, and driving a reinitialization of the sub-CRQs once a new CRQ is registered with the hypervisor. fixes: faacf8c5f1d5 ("ibmvfc: add alloc/dealloc routines for SCSI Sub-CRQ Channels") Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler Reviewed-by: Brian King --- drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 21 +++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c index 384960036f8b..d34e1a4f74d9 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c @@ -158,6 +158,9 @@ static void ibmvfc_npiv_logout(struct ibmvfc_host *); static void ibmvfc_tgt_implicit_logout_and_del(struct ibmvfc_target *); static void ibmvfc_tgt_move_login(struct ibmvfc_target *); +static void ibmvfc_release_sub_crqs(struct ibmvfc_host *); +static void ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(struct ibmvfc_host *); + static const char *unknown_error = "unknown error"; static long h_reg_sub_crq(unsigned long unit_address, unsigned long ioba, @@ -926,8 +929,8 @@ static int ibmvfc_reset_crq(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost) unsigned long flags; struct vio_dev *vdev = to_vio_dev(vhost->dev); struct ibmvfc_queue *crq = &vhost->crq; - struct ibmvfc_queue *scrq; - int i; + + ibmvfc_release_sub_crqs(vhost); /* Close the CRQ */ do { @@ -947,16 +950,6 @@ static int ibmvfc_reset_crq(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost) memset(crq->msgs.crq, 0, PAGE_SIZE); crq->cur = 0; - if (vhost->scsi_scrqs.scrqs) { - for (i = 0; i < nr_scsi_hw_queues; i++) { - scrq = &vhost->scsi_scrqs.scrqs[i]; - spin_lock(scrq->q_lock); - memset(scrq->msgs.scrq, 0, PAGE_SIZE); - scrq->cur = 0; - spin_unlock(scrq->q_lock); - } - } - /* And re-open it again */ rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_REG_CRQ, vdev->unit_address, crq->msg_token, PAGE_SIZE); @@ -966,9 +959,12 @@ static int ibmvfc_reset_crq(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost) dev_warn(vhost->dev, "Partner adapter not ready\n"); else if (rc != 0) dev_warn(vhost->dev, "Couldn't register crq (rc=%d)\n", rc); + spin_unlock(vhost->crq.q_lock); spin_unlock_irqrestore(vhost->host->host_lock, flags); + ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(vhost); + return rc; } @@ -5692,6 +5688,7 @@ static void ibmvfc_deregister_scsi_channel(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost, int index) free_irq(scrq->irq, scrq); irq_dispose_mapping(scrq->irq); + scrq->irq = 0; do { rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, vdev->unit_address, From patchwork Thu Feb 25 21:50:55 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tyrel Datwyler X-Patchwork-Id: 1444643 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=R+Ss6lHE; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DmmjD67DFz9s1l for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:52:16 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DmmjD56jJz3dLJ for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:52:16 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=R+Ss6lHE; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=tyreld@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=R+Ss6lHE; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Dmmgt70cdz3cZ1 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:51:05 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11PLX3L4075529; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:51:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=mCOJ/LF7H2N6Fhn70L8rooW/K3heQAfkmSAPfOnUqA4=; b=R+Ss6lHEgdGIADyvDhEyqEOs/rJIS2/mRx5t4SqzCLp1LlFZbza0rPEeNCXujabcOIgi JEAVhDJwHxUNycYb+ZRdrFpkUyCMtjT3zonnWIFBYZE95VWjas2vZamdeSKC8IudlPq+ XY/qa/61u1CEs5+dMtOj/s/Oc7wzOf5dPHWK5PP+MV44aRMxNuLBgVbx2dBCYOiFZZQh 5wKREwjNxGJLbaOjADyIXNGpSYuxPvQvbiC52OX0sbQ2BnbVDdUnLFVQ/K2gdEzG7y9O aqi1KQS44zyHXO8w3TQerEHJEuxR9IY8V8jQ/rsMFvmC7ir/ekIHkbS6u52x0FMl4uhq og== Received: from ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (7a.29.35a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.53.41.122]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36xh9953x3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:51:02 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 11PLmQdi000847; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:51:01 GMT Received: from b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.15]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 36tt2b494j-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:51:01 +0000 Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.232]) by b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 11PLoxJa16777688 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:51:00 GMT Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02476E04E; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:50:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A996E056; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:50:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vios4361.aus.stglabs.ibm.com (unknown [9.3.43.61]) by b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:50:59 +0000 (GMT) From: Tyrel Datwyler To: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com Subject: [PATCH v4 3/5] ibmvfc: treat H_CLOSED as success during sub-CRQ registration Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:50:55 -0600 Message-Id: <20210225215057.23020-4-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20210225215057.23020-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> References: <20210225215057.23020-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-02-25_14:2021-02-24, 2021-02-25 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102250163 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tyrel Datwyler , martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, brking@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" A non-zero return code for H_REG_SUB_CRQ is currently treated as a failure resulting in failing sub-CRQ setup. The case of H_CLOSED should not be treated as a failure. This return code translates to a successful sub-CRQ registration by the hypervisor, and is meant to communicate back that there is currently no partner VIOS CRQ connection established as of yet. This is a common occurrence during a disconnect where the client adapter can possibly come back up prior to the partner adapter. For non-zero return code from H_REG_SUB_CRQ treat a H_CLOSED as success so that sub-CRQs are successfully setup. Fixes: faacf8c5f1d5 ("ibmvfc: add alloc/dealloc routines for SCSI Sub-CRQ Channels") Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler Reviewed-by: Brian King --- drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c index d34e1a4f74d9..1d9f961715ca 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c @@ -5636,7 +5636,8 @@ static int ibmvfc_register_scsi_channel(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost, rc = h_reg_sub_crq(vdev->unit_address, scrq->msg_token, PAGE_SIZE, &scrq->cookie, &scrq->hw_irq); - if (rc) { + /* H_CLOSED indicates successful register, but no CRQ partner */ + if (rc && rc != H_CLOSED) { dev_warn(dev, "Error registering sub-crq: %d\n", rc); if (rc == H_PARAMETER) dev_warn_once(dev, "Firmware may not support MQ\n"); From patchwork Thu Feb 25 21:50:56 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tyrel Datwyler X-Patchwork-Id: 1444642 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=OnSVjkeZ; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Dmmhm1H3Hz9s1l for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:51:52 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Dmmhm04p8z3dDt for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:51:52 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=OnSVjkeZ; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=tyreld@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=OnSVjkeZ; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Dmmgt4z1pz3cYr for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:51:05 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11PLXB0j141622; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:51:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=ZkvXIMVJGjwuiCfuG5uF4ldFvhede59Cis5SwsdGaNw=; b=OnSVjkeZb7QW3aHwsfoXC1WORmXO71yA58pQVR5Oe+Kv59vREfwx3i/N7u5TRvVkMHjf pxwap7Cc8xXGzx19jlAJxN32cw1WRj5MKK+76VvjY0CmGxRUPgKizYN8Us7LTHH44D3N phwqUc74MISEAao4hhlarfgBZAoUmaicPi3b36nHElJDRnqZBF6iIa5rO5tguFnXfJMY BlVCyegqMcxmU0yPb8fbG56giLMF9DrTd0LmQCCqyHlVwo3OaeUqQ0ljT6+d4spjkpRR zZ+p/86M/eHVuCDNC1uCL/mI4MKnFCQQfAeEuVEkVpJbi9VUpn/ijw455oVHl3MLi74R tw== Received: from ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (fd.55.37a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.55.85.253]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36xfcxh636-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:51:03 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 11PLmVUY018692; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:51:01 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.20]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 36tt29hvwb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:51:01 +0000 Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.232]) by b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 11PLp0Oe31981876 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:51:00 GMT Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4179F6E04C; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:51:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6256E053; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:50:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vios4361.aus.stglabs.ibm.com (unknown [9.3.43.61]) by b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:50:59 +0000 (GMT) From: Tyrel Datwyler To: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com Subject: [PATCH v4 4/5] ibmvfc: store return code of H_FREE_SUB_CRQ during cleanup Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:50:56 -0600 Message-Id: <20210225215057.23020-5-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20210225215057.23020-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> References: <20210225215057.23020-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-02-25_14:2021-02-24, 2021-02-25 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102250163 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tyrel Datwyler , martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, brking@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The H_FREE_SUB_CRQ hypercall can return a retry delay return code that indicates the call needs to be retried after a specific amount of time delay. The error path to free a sub-CRQ in case of a failure during channel registration fails to capture the return code of H_FREE_SUB_CRQ which will result in the delay loop being skipped in the case of a retry delay return code. Store the return code result of the H_FREE_SUB_CRQ call such that the return code check in the delay loop evaluates a meaningful value. Also, use the rtas_busy_delay() to check the rc value and delay for the appropriate amount of time. Fixes: 9288d35d70b5 ("ibmvfc: map/request irq and register Sub-CRQ interrupt handler") Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler Reviewed-by: Brian King --- drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c index 1d9f961715ca..ef03fa559433 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -5670,8 +5671,8 @@ static int ibmvfc_register_scsi_channel(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost, irq_failed: do { - plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, vdev->unit_address, scrq->cookie); - } while (rc == H_BUSY || H_IS_LONG_BUSY(rc)); + rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, vdev->unit_address, scrq->cookie); + } while (rtas_busy_delay(rc)); reg_failed: ibmvfc_free_queue(vhost, scrq); LEAVE; From patchwork Thu Feb 25 21:50:57 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tyrel Datwyler X-Patchwork-Id: 1444645 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=dEdIKAuS; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Dmmk86zKjz9s1l for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:53:04 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Dmmk85qJrz3dY5 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:53:04 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=dEdIKAuS; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=tyreld@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=dEdIKAuS; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Dmmgv0THRz3cZB for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:51:05 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11PLX3Ol075512; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:51:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=UvwvlC54y4paFAvsUh+rgdZ3V7FM+LNSvEGafGNoUvM=; b=dEdIKAuS8RSLkUTkGASbZTNS7f2/FTDs+KtPsH81b/a14KgiUJHZ9cz8jb2Fr6grveyY hU2QLj7Oa/BGG+88LnQUUxHOVEZX4Ywt2dJeN7Valeh80whVlFP0g3F1aizM+8vrjaKP b89DpJtseD2Mm7RYjH0K4IFlRCQNvaAdz9nC+uKFZBkLW0g7Dgw1182x4sa8FaeH5KBe Ie18jio6zaD4hSVghAZTOj2syQ5mD8BE9J8bid1XYczxog4JEzNuG4HCUdtQftBsGvsS cS9IPWlo9AiY+WJrmjMPc/mzI2n4Mq9Lw/VBIUOLdQGhqXfeVYXGHQatiydfIzAJDToV kw== Received: from ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com (1a.90.2fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.47.144.26]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36xh9953x5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:51:03 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 11PLmBX9008671; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:51:02 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.20]) by ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 36tt2a1vn2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:51:01 +0000 Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.232]) by b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 11PLp0aV38207892 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:51:00 GMT Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BD66E052; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:51:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA496E04E; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:51:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vios4361.aus.stglabs.ibm.com (unknown [9.3.43.61]) by b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:51:00 +0000 (GMT) From: Tyrel Datwyler To: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com Subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] ibmvfc: reinitialize sub-CRQs and perform channel enquiry after LPM Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:50:57 -0600 Message-Id: <20210225215057.23020-6-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20210225215057.23020-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> References: <20210225215057.23020-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-02-25_14:2021-02-24, 2021-02-25 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102250163 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tyrel Datwyler , martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, brking@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" A live partition migration (LPM) results in a CRQ disconnect similar to a hard reset. In this LPM case the hypervisor moslty perserves the CRQ transport such that it simply needs to be reenabled. However, the capabilities may have changed such as fewer channels, or no channels at all. Further, its possible that there may be sub-CRQ support, but no channel support. The CRQ reenable path currently doesn't take any of this into consideration. For simpilicty release and reinitialize sub-CRQs during reenable, and set do_enquiry and using_channels with the appropriate values to trigger channel renegotiation. fixes: faacf8c5f1d5 ("ibmvfc: add alloc/dealloc routines for SCSI Sub-CRQ Channels") Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler Reviewed-by: Brian King --- drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c index ef03fa559433..1e2ea21713ad 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c @@ -903,6 +903,9 @@ static int ibmvfc_reenable_crq_queue(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost) { int rc = 0; struct vio_dev *vdev = to_vio_dev(vhost->dev); + unsigned long flags; + + ibmvfc_release_sub_crqs(vhost); /* Re-enable the CRQ */ do { @@ -914,6 +917,15 @@ static int ibmvfc_reenable_crq_queue(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost) if (rc) dev_err(vhost->dev, "Error enabling adapter (rc=%d)\n", rc); + spin_lock_irqsave(vhost->host->host_lock, flags); + spin_lock(vhost->crq.q_lock); + vhost->do_enquiry = 1; + vhost->using_channels = 0; + spin_unlock(vhost->crq.q_lock); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(vhost->host->host_lock, flags); + + ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(vhost); + return rc; }