From patchwork Thu Feb 25 20:48:20 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tyrel Datwyler X-Patchwork-Id: 1444615 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=HGmSqr7a; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DmlKb6Y6Zz9sCD for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:50:11 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DmlKb5fR8z3dJR for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:50:11 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=HGmSqr7a; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=tyreld@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=HGmSqr7a; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DmlHj5p1Fz3cZt for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:48:33 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11PKYulZ065954; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:48:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=nILnawZBkXgE9K7dLnpbGy1lY+tttA4o0oEurj3Me0Q=; b=HGmSqr7ae+ysabR9l6hhU3+bsHkUNkz0OA4lq8WNbVdfRp0Dn5jZOxy7rkR+msjWiRtk CLO47k6Q+m3Js5n9MRh19QBMEe/EJj/Yp6hBwDAsBON+1m4v8f9MugCIBxbc6+Q2lA2b P8HlHII4ByxBRjMPU1VjRdiRON+niTD6IsS/GvqG/K/kwCMoJvUO8UCcPkn6NYlFZqsp mWY1p161Fa8Y7xX+pzcKKZiMX508qzHSmhYOyO4S9CuKE0hokdEbBB07hC6n3rd992EZ TM4hmWWce4LYXH8PlIF/2ew3w53Lwe3gJHhJw2v89aZEgAYmwBIztkAXpcxk3b7/zlkC /Q== Received: from ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (83.d6.3fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.63.214.131]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36xfcjyfhu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:48:29 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 11PKlYfw002887; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:28 GMT Received: from b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.15]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 36tt2abuk8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:28 +0000 Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.232]) by b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 11PKmRjV28311872 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:27 GMT Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384DC6E058; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6466E04E; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vios4361.aus.stglabs.ibm.com (unknown [9.3.43.61]) by b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:26 +0000 (GMT) From: Tyrel Datwyler To: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] ibmvfc: simplify handling of sub-CRQ initialization Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:48:20 -0600 Message-Id: <20210225204824.14570-2-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20210225204824.14570-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> References: <20210225204824.14570-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-02-25_11:2021-02-24, 2021-02-25 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102250158 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tyrel Datwyler , martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, brking@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" If ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs() fails ibmvfc_probe() simply parrots registration failure reported elsewhere, and futher vhost->scsi_scrq.scrq == NULL is indication enough to the driver that it has no sub-CRQs available. The mq_enabled check can also be moved into ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs() such that each caller doesn't have to gate the call with a mq_enabled check. Finally, in the case of sub-CRQ setup failure setting do_enquiry can be turned off to putting the driver into single queue fallback mode. The aforementioned changes also simplify the next patch in the series that fixes a hard reset issue, by tying a sub-CRQ setup failure and do_enquiry logic into ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(). Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler Reviewed-by: Brian King --- drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 21 ++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c index 7097028d4cb6..384960036f8b 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c @@ -5705,17 +5705,21 @@ static void ibmvfc_deregister_scsi_channel(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost, int index) LEAVE; } -static int ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost) +static void ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost) { int i, j; ENTER; + if (!vhost->mq_enabled) + return; vhost->scsi_scrqs.scrqs = kcalloc(nr_scsi_hw_queues, sizeof(*vhost->scsi_scrqs.scrqs), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!vhost->scsi_scrqs.scrqs) - return -1; + if (!vhost->scsi_scrqs.scrqs) { + vhost->do_enquiry = 0; + return; + } for (i = 0; i < nr_scsi_hw_queues; i++) { if (ibmvfc_register_scsi_channel(vhost, i)) { @@ -5724,13 +5728,12 @@ static int ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost) kfree(vhost->scsi_scrqs.scrqs); vhost->scsi_scrqs.scrqs = NULL; vhost->scsi_scrqs.active_queues = 0; - LEAVE; - return -1; + vhost->do_enquiry = 0; + break; } } LEAVE; - return 0; } static void ibmvfc_release_sub_crqs(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost) @@ -5997,11 +6000,7 @@ static int ibmvfc_probe(struct vio_dev *vdev, const struct vio_device_id *id) goto remove_shost; } - if (vhost->mq_enabled) { - rc = ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(vhost); - if (rc) - dev_warn(dev, "Failed to allocate Sub-CRQs. rc=%d\n", rc); - } + ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(vhost); if (shost_to_fc_host(shost)->rqst_q) blk_queue_max_segments(shost_to_fc_host(shost)->rqst_q, 1); From patchwork Thu Feb 25 20:48:21 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tyrel Datwyler X-Patchwork-Id: 1444612 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=foK5ii+U; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DmlJ60rzFz9sCD for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:48:54 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DmlJ56yPsz3clt for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:48:53 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=foK5ii+U; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=tyreld@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=foK5ii+U; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DmlHj40qHz3cZh for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:48:32 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11PKYFjh035701; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:48:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=3UJhECTJ8Lq8CSwy7ZDDyqgl8A+F7dNbRsh0MA5G864=; b=foK5ii+UoGT3FGd0ade+IAAaMxXHWL10cF7nuwGfHqKBG1jm9m11Bsl9Spoq7PaNhb+G ep1wTAJFLHUrkaqyF4FRPGGfPWin1MQgMYLCXkdSwJIhcaW6gkpKVYAERBfG+Q82vfo1 VJxPtaPbur/Te6I/EbPnGEfANuQbmg5F10EBLC9z0RM3Z2VVh/67hID5FvSeq5ZBuTge eMmx7gEvIkSq/pM6yL3tPSN21Gar/f7MDP/Qg6Aiy1+izKiM8WD/n/FIWDDGMkbEeVXM B4nHxc5CD0zO2vZZtT9vpSlTB2URlenoLEMHevdeZQVoD6o1UiB1yVUcYAkBpZ8SCBxD sQ== Received: from ppma03dal.us.ibm.com (b.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.11]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36xe10bav1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:48:30 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 11PKluga003411; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:29 GMT Received: from b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.15]) by ppma03dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 36v5y9mcct-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:29 +0000 Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.232]) by b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 11PKmRvI28311874 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:27 GMT Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945B96E05D; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478296E04E; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vios4361.aus.stglabs.ibm.com (unknown [9.3.43.61]) by b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:27 +0000 (GMT) From: Tyrel Datwyler To: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] ibmvfc: fix invalid sub-CRQ handles after hard reset Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:48:21 -0600 Message-Id: <20210225204824.14570-3-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20210225204824.14570-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> References: <20210225204824.14570-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-02-25_11:2021-02-24, 2021-02-25 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102250158 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tyrel Datwyler , martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, brking@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" A hard reset results in a complete transport disconnect such that the CRQ connection with the partner VIOS is broken. This has the side effect of also invalidating the associated sub-CRQs. The current code assumes that the sub-CRQs are perserved resulting in a protocol violation after trying to reconnect them with the VIOS. This introduces an infinite loop such that the VIOS forces a disconnect after each subsequent attempt to re-register with invalid handles. Avoid the aforementioned issue by releasing the sub-CRQs prior to CRQ disconnect, and driving a reinitialization of the sub-CRQs once a new CRQ is registered with the hypervisor. fixes: faacf8c5f1d5 ("ibmvfc: add alloc/dealloc routines for SCSI Sub-CRQ Channels") Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler Reviewed-by: Brian King --- drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 21 +++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c index 384960036f8b..3dd20f383453 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c @@ -158,6 +158,9 @@ static void ibmvfc_npiv_logout(struct ibmvfc_host *); static void ibmvfc_tgt_implicit_logout_and_del(struct ibmvfc_target *); static void ibmvfc_tgt_move_login(struct ibmvfc_target *); +static void ibmvfc_release_sub_crqs(struct ibmvfc_host *); +static void ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(struct ibmvfc_host *); + static const char *unknown_error = "unknown error"; static long h_reg_sub_crq(unsigned long unit_address, unsigned long ioba, @@ -926,8 +929,8 @@ static int ibmvfc_reset_crq(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost) unsigned long flags; struct vio_dev *vdev = to_vio_dev(vhost->dev); struct ibmvfc_queue *crq = &vhost->crq; - struct ibmvfc_queue *scrq; - int i; + + ibmvfc_release_sub_crqs(vhost); /* Close the CRQ */ do { @@ -947,16 +950,6 @@ static int ibmvfc_reset_crq(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost) memset(crq->msgs.crq, 0, PAGE_SIZE); crq->cur = 0; - if (vhost->scsi_scrqs.scrqs) { - for (i = 0; i < nr_scsi_hw_queues; i++) { - scrq = &vhost->scsi_scrqs.scrqs[i]; - spin_lock(scrq->q_lock); - memset(scrq->msgs.scrq, 0, PAGE_SIZE); - scrq->cur = 0; - spin_unlock(scrq->q_lock); - } - } - /* And re-open it again */ rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_REG_CRQ, vdev->unit_address, crq->msg_token, PAGE_SIZE); @@ -966,6 +959,9 @@ static int ibmvfc_reset_crq(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost) dev_warn(vhost->dev, "Partner adapter not ready\n"); else if (rc != 0) dev_warn(vhost->dev, "Couldn't register crq (rc=%d)\n", rc); + + ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(vhost); + spin_unlock(vhost->crq.q_lock); spin_unlock_irqrestore(vhost->host->host_lock, flags); @@ -5692,6 +5688,7 @@ static void ibmvfc_deregister_scsi_channel(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost, int index) free_irq(scrq->irq, scrq); irq_dispose_mapping(scrq->irq); + scrq->irq = 0; do { rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, vdev->unit_address, From patchwork Thu Feb 25 20:48:22 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tyrel Datwyler X-Patchwork-Id: 1444613 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=UGtVdC8X; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DmlJZ6m6Pz9sCD for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:49:18 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DmlJZ5dRvz3cmK for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:49:18 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=UGtVdC8X; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=tyreld@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=UGtVdC8X; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DmlHj552qz3cZl for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:48:32 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11PKYt3w088882; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:48:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=XNJPQ1yZpvnoSLRI/ZOLiz1GIbhHvMflJIZ/7VBGJS0=; b=UGtVdC8XM82Z7w0C4UX/FxS0N34w47iaDejuUUToXBETO7SmDj52sH+euY1KbfE5g4TD n1cDC1icOd66HuRs5wZzbTUu1UBZ/TojKeMMqVKwStMmmglHpd75NkNl2PPn12TWRDSG jfOng3tKh9v5vUA/Zrk5IohzYhkxkjwItOiyokKFOFjiOmIEK+PsTeE67xoC8UsdXjTL W8H5D8zcUTuv6YLpgztr840vIEft6UXsAPvmUPWWh/KjIOtnvseC6PEbDdLGSMU37zlC iG2PdXEBr6xZ5x5V7q9u8KLZry6LxDOdaNBIFymvYRR/Dp0VNOd6C/oIQa6EyRQXrgmS 0g== Received: from ppma02wdc.us.ibm.com (aa.5b.37a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.55.91.170]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36xjs0rthp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:48:30 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 11PKkvuf002739; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:29 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.20]) by ppma02wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 36tt29hfg9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:29 +0000 Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.232]) by b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 11PKmS0j38011362 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:28 GMT Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6336E050; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D176E04E; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vios4361.aus.stglabs.ibm.com (unknown [9.3.43.61]) by b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:27 +0000 (GMT) From: Tyrel Datwyler To: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] ibmvfc: treat H_CLOSED as success during sub-CRQ registration Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:48:22 -0600 Message-Id: <20210225204824.14570-4-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20210225204824.14570-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> References: <20210225204824.14570-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-02-25_11:2021-02-24, 2021-02-25 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1011 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102250158 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tyrel Datwyler , martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, brking@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" A non-zero return code for H_REG_SUB_CRQ is currently treated as a failure resulting in failing sub-CRQ setup. The case of H_CLOSED should not be treated as a failure. This return code translates to a successful sub-CRQ registration by the hypervisor, and is meant to communicate back that there is currently no partner VIOS CRQ connection established as of yet. This is a common occurrence during a disconnect where the client adapter can possibly come back up prior to the partner adapter. For non-zero return code from H_REG_SUB_CRQ treat a H_CLOSED as success so that sub-CRQs are successfully setup. Fixes: faacf8c5f1d5 ("ibmvfc: add alloc/dealloc routines for SCSI Sub-CRQ Channels") Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler Reviewed-by: Brian King --- drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c index 3dd20f383453..ba6fcf9cbc57 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c @@ -5636,7 +5636,8 @@ static int ibmvfc_register_scsi_channel(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost, rc = h_reg_sub_crq(vdev->unit_address, scrq->msg_token, PAGE_SIZE, &scrq->cookie, &scrq->hw_irq); - if (rc) { + /* H_CLOSED indicates successful register, but no CRQ partner */ + if (rc && rc != H_CLOSED) { dev_warn(dev, "Error registering sub-crq: %d\n", rc); if (rc == H_PARAMETER) dev_warn_once(dev, "Firmware may not support MQ\n"); From patchwork Thu Feb 25 20:48:23 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tyrel Datwyler X-Patchwork-Id: 1444617 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=V266Lxg6; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DmlLg5WbNz9sVV for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:51:07 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DmlLg27nHz3dX9 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:51:07 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=V266Lxg6; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=tyreld@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=V266Lxg6; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DmlJW5cNnz3cmZ for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:49:15 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11PKYvO8163004; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:49:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=J0uWTrHIk6oNTIWtgvGVHPADCf5iJCgm2AKv0bC8II0=; b=V266Lxg6SBijbWxiM6j1k7DW3FsdkzqwLh6nvq1+JX1zdQSJDK/7nl0xbbLSHGQa/nlb wllVfHEC+6nCZBZbFiMflOhQ4uirdIZ8jJFYXeIXTTGhW1943gdFdj2wRFIt4Ux+/9ye vxy8pdpU1oZMhrxShj7FNQZ1CHAyDPrb1M/SusFCYWH1J4HKJ1+3RGtHs8CqDApVKolL 8xgn1N4r/3AljjeohPNhBW3vbGHA9EAD35lMnh+rjkammZxbSOZDJxBbDQ/5AoNU0xw5 h5VoBdL5gVyhlZgCw3dizjQvTj2hxujgXu9GrDmHWXRYpw5JOOlGwwKPmTQxLHGSKh8r vQ== Received: from ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (7a.29.35a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.53.41.122]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36xgksvmm6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:49:12 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 11PKnARX023403; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:49:12 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.20]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 36tt2b3tqm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:49:12 +0000 Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.232]) by b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 11PKmSfM37224930 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:28 GMT Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56AFF6E050; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BD76E054; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vios4361.aus.stglabs.ibm.com (unknown [9.3.43.61]) by b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:27 +0000 (GMT) From: Tyrel Datwyler To: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] ibmvfc: store return code of H_FREE_SUB_CRQ during cleanup Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:48:23 -0600 Message-Id: <20210225204824.14570-5-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20210225204824.14570-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> References: <20210225204824.14570-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-02-25_11:2021-02-24, 2021-02-25 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102250158 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tyrel Datwyler , martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, brking@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The H_FREE_SUB_CRQ hypercall can return a retry delay return code that indicates the call needs to be retried after a specific amount of time delay. The error path to free a sub-CRQ in case of a failure during channel registration fails to capture the return code of H_FREE_SUB_CRQ which will result in the delay loop being skipped in the case of a retry delay return code. Store the return code result of the H_FREE_SUB_CRQ call such that the return code check in the delay loop evaluates a meaningful value. Also, use the rtas_busy_delay() to check the rc value and delay for the appropriate amount of time. Fixes: 9288d35d70b5 ("ibmvfc: map/request irq and register Sub-CRQ interrupt handler") Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler Reviewed-by: Brian King --- drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c index ba6fcf9cbc57..4ac2c442e1e2 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -5670,8 +5671,8 @@ static int ibmvfc_register_scsi_channel(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost, irq_failed: do { - plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, vdev->unit_address, scrq->cookie); - } while (rc == H_BUSY || H_IS_LONG_BUSY(rc)); + rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, vdev->unit_address, scrq->cookie); + } while (rtas_busy_delay(rc)); reg_failed: ibmvfc_free_queue(vhost, scrq); LEAVE; From patchwork Thu Feb 25 20:48:24 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tyrel Datwyler X-Patchwork-Id: 1444614 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=pOW8XAtz; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DmlK32czyz9sCD for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:49:43 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DmlK31KZFz3dD2 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:49:43 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=pOW8XAtz; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=tyreld@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=pOW8XAtz; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DmlHj5jC4z3cZn for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:48:33 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11PKYqB3088524; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:48:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=rHXyDtHziGzaUQkCoKSeHk0dhXhxFPrOV3Zw+wNZyc0=; b=pOW8XAtzGoyzLTnKDqc9N/+o8tbdOpOQvXF14k4M8bcJUvvbUPWlggmjWuWGjZrNwYgw sDnlvefp2FJHSFU5h6dzCATR2TPCC64DZHTM98KhkPPW518WCl7eXtupl9LlDIdwkbxX Htj2pUJvyYF6irBgHLdWgBhBj6yP/jja8M+iEOAOlEheNMfJrvtOCVVeq93V+KGXrp33 z/fE8+6tRWHXy1apDCPj+qwTqAPORJBZKw0drHbuiaMbMQwrY7i/sKi6e/CvfCFJmKri Vterd8It7P2eRiadsNTHp75FHqcddoglyLgK0wsevi/uJVzszVJg2TVuVQVe9iZ5eRC+ Gw== Received: from ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (a.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.10]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36xjs0rtj6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:48:31 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 11PKkwIL029463; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:30 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.20]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 36tt2akwck-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:30 +0000 Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.232]) by b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 11PKmSHq26280332 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:28 GMT Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A1D6E050; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6503A6E054; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vios4361.aus.stglabs.ibm.com (unknown [9.3.43.61]) by b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:48:28 +0000 (GMT) From: Tyrel Datwyler To: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] ibmvfc: reinitialize sub-CRQs and perform channel enquiry after LPM Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:48:24 -0600 Message-Id: <20210225204824.14570-6-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20210225204824.14570-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> References: <20210225204824.14570-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-02-25_11:2021-02-24, 2021-02-25 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102250158 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tyrel Datwyler , martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, brking@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" A live partition migration (LPM) results in a CRQ disconnect similar to a hard reset. In this LPM case the hypervisor moslty perserves the CRQ transport such that it simply needs to be reenabled. However, the capabilities may have changed such as fewer channels, or no channels at all. Further, its possible that there may be sub-CRQ support, but no channel support. The CRQ reenable path currently doesn't take any of this into consideration. For simpilicty release and reinitialize sub-CRQs during reenable, and set do_enquiry and using_channels with the appropriate values to trigger channel renegotiation. Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler --- drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c index 4ac2c442e1e2..9ae6be56e375 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c @@ -903,6 +903,9 @@ static int ibmvfc_reenable_crq_queue(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost) { int rc = 0; struct vio_dev *vdev = to_vio_dev(vhost->dev); + unsigned long flags; + + ibmvfc_release_sub_crqs(vhost); /* Re-enable the CRQ */ do { @@ -914,6 +917,16 @@ static int ibmvfc_reenable_crq_queue(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost) if (rc) dev_err(vhost->dev, "Error enabling adapter (rc=%d)\n", rc); + spin_lock_irqsave(vhost->host->host_lock, flags); + spin_lock(vhost->crq.q_lock); + vhost->do_enquiry = 1; + vhost->using_channels = 0; + + ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(vhost); + + spin_unlock(vhost->crq.q_lock); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(vhost->host->host_lock, flags); + return rc; }