From patchwork Fri Jan 29 09:00:30 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Nicolas Ferre X-Patchwork-Id: 1433152 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming-imx@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming-imx@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org (client-ip=2001:8b0:10b:1231::1; helo=merlin.infradead.org; envelope-from=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+incoming-imx=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=merlin.20170209 header.b=2flxAByg; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mchp header.b=QXJFR6Xz; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1231::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DRrt92xXyz9sVt for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 20:01:21 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Owner; bh=wkjkDn59RQrdEx+FglAZF/mcMTCcq/iPp4dt7QtDy64=; b=2flxABygFWzYsLTzdmMSszJj0H tOWKrlWLsejostwWwalDn9EubaxSqGtjutCsYeiMIXRKPwtr8Bt6ua6pDwI1V0ZwCuptallsuba7K +4MayhBvhT4X+OsBQQyG6GGzTTjkGklkTdhu2xNeNm7V8dMo5Zd+xNmUXUNyDP5qIXQPQfv+I9wKp SypYcRSAJf3UcqEj1G6dq3HI8HixEjXACchv1Qs95taTgHysnN4KBY/WcbvtazHuerDYrNT1KcsqP dHLCAR+AfLNMY9azUN3DtHswV/MECXvANJ8hk1j0uzRCREee/TSaNOIo1RMMgUyOQa7zq1zFX7WDQ PwjALWXQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l5PeG-0002Mp-1P; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:01:00 +0000 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.123]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l5PeB-0002LG-0T for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:00:57 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1611910855; x=1643446855; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=b6vV06zCZmgKZ/7BPwxq3c9K7YNtOdwxJzxTQOWp68U=; b=QXJFR6XzKahyNkrot8+R1X9kCdZz6A9oy9MyHtSd8xlpiT76Wfaee8Wb TcMJuUTywf0F69NFZBCyuPZErGuc9yo8ONfmais8ovnnCF1VSOKnqBSYn DuICNRiZlJ7x93+lOQIp9h+bkBiZV03W963dPh85FYpF8UwVZ3ouk+Y2T Yp+pi98SgUyx+0/6wMeYdZHj8tLmv8FUOZ4RTaerHup0+LxcegZdyjcPJ eXl7Ssu6by3PWD4aO1Q6ROfAytl1SA1BMarZ4kAsBkL26uLY0fPHZv3af 2bgIFLNTwiRcllsXo3E2zwyDaBtaj4MVvif2ZEE9zRAeLHog2a8z/xqL0 w==; IronPort-SDR: Y8Pv7I4JiuAuAUr1Oc07mAGISxUvodaHAuOGNbtUXVctw1jNRmwnG9e18PLIcD9UpsjdzUhhod EyyS6o0LCJB+TKLjLZZF0gnDRfvE14KwTW2IDsAYn+L9GXqJcbsrMcLh/UQIZU+Xpxk8zEsp51 J4YtvSydIfYQwP5Twjd+LHMxxS9e4NF3np/4hxhsIlhtKYOzUr1KORekjvz1huauA+T0KWOheg oUg7f6aRu+CsOzMeSRQkoMxHVziulqyNa+cArYMRQs8KIA7U+lOuEITMAd7x1oobUsvY/RDMSK fIU= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,385,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="101890434" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa4.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 29 Jan 2021 02:00:49 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 02:00:49 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 02:00:47 -0700 From: To: Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , , Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: soc for 5.12 #2 Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 10:00:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20210129090030.26976-1-nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: microchip X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210129_040055_266560_622B8B83 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.35 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [68.232.154.123 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [68.232.154.123 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Alexandre Belloni , Linux Kernel list , Ludovic Desroches , Claudiu Beznea , linux-arm-kernel Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+incoming-imx=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org From: Nicolas Ferre Arnd, Olof, Here is the second batch of soc changes for 5.12. Actually first batch was consumed as "fixes" following our discussion here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/CAK8P3a1v=_4E40cZjZ-ff7vs84XE9XaxwdoGW7Rf+LYiA+TCTw@mail.gmail.com/ Note that v5.11-rc1 is the root of this Pull-Request so the 2 first patches are the ones already taken as fixes. The fixes are now in Linus' tree and this branch is merged in linux-next for an handful of days. However, tell me if you'd prefer that I merge the arm-soc "arm/fixes" branch before adding the at91 soc patches on top. Thanks, best regards, Nicolas The following changes since commit 5c8fe583cce542aa0b84adc939ce85293de36e5e: Linux 5.11-rc1 (2020-12-27 15:30:22 -0800) are available in the Git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/at91/linux.git tags/at91-soc-5.12-2 for you to fetch changes up to cd9168b4377932a6494d464db1ddd3f63e41fce3: drivers: soc: atmel: add spdx license identifier (2021-01-26 11:25:08 +0100) ---------------------------------------------------------------- AT91 SoC for 5.12 #2 - addition of SAMA7G5 identification to soc.c driver - enhancements to this soc.c driver ---------------------------------------------------------------- Claudiu Beznea (7): drivers: soc: atmel: add null entry at the end of at91_soc_allowed_list[] drivers: soc: atmel: use GENMASK drivers: soc: atmel: fix "__initconst should be placed after socs[]" warning drivers: soc: atmel: add per soc id and version match masks dt-bindings: atmel-sysreg: add "microchip, sama7g5-chipid" drivers: soc: atmel: add support for sama7g5 drivers: soc: atmel: add spdx license identifier Sudeep Holla (1): drivers: soc: atmel: Avoid calling at91_soc_init on non AT91 SoCs .../devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt | 2 +- drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c | 240 ++++++++++++++------- drivers/soc/atmel/soc.h | 19 +- 3 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)