From patchwork Thu Nov 26 11:11:05 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Alex Chen X-Patchwork-Id: 1406541 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Chb5K0z4Jz9sVL for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 22:24:51 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:38320 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiFOL-0004a5-T7 for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:24:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35548) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiFNI-0004V4-HQ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:23:44 -0500 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:2804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiFND-0003rC-CE; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:23:44 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Chb3D36tpzkcb7; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 19:23:04 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.124.27) by DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 19:23:23 +0800 From: Alex Chen To: , , Subject: [PATCH 1/5] i.MX25: Fix bad printf format specifiers Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:11:05 +0000 Message-ID: <20201126111109.112238-2-alex.chen@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20201126111109.112238-1-alex.chen@huawei.com> References: <20201126111109.112238-1-alex.chen@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.124.27] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.190; envelope-from=alex.chen@huawei.com; helo=szxga04-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: alex.chen@huawei.com, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" We should use printf format specifier "%u" instead of "%d" for argument of type "unsigned int". Reported-by: Euler Robot Signed-off-by: Alex Chen --- hw/misc/imx25_ccm.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/misc/imx25_ccm.c b/hw/misc/imx25_ccm.c index d3107e5ca2..ff996e2f2c 100644 --- a/hw/misc/imx25_ccm.c +++ b/hw/misc/imx25_ccm.c @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static const char *imx25_ccm_reg_name(uint32_t reg) case IMX25_CCM_LPIMR1_REG: return "lpimr1"; default: - sprintf(unknown, "[%d ?]", reg); + sprintf(unknown, "[%u ?]", reg); return unknown; } } @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static uint32_t imx25_ccm_get_mpll_clk(IMXCCMState *dev) freq = imx_ccm_calc_pll(s->reg[IMX25_CCM_MPCTL_REG], CKIH_FREQ); } - DPRINTF("freq = %d\n", freq); + DPRINTF("freq = %u\n", freq); return freq; } @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static uint32_t imx25_ccm_get_mcu_clk(IMXCCMState *dev) freq = freq / (1 + EXTRACT(s->reg[IMX25_CCM_CCTL_REG], ARM_CLK_DIV)); - DPRINTF("freq = %d\n", freq); + DPRINTF("freq = %u\n", freq); return freq; } @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static uint32_t imx25_ccm_get_ahb_clk(IMXCCMState *dev) freq = imx25_ccm_get_mcu_clk(dev) / (1 + EXTRACT(s->reg[IMX25_CCM_CCTL_REG], AHB_CLK_DIV)); - DPRINTF("freq = %d\n", freq); + DPRINTF("freq = %u\n", freq); return freq; } @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static uint32_t imx25_ccm_get_ipg_clk(IMXCCMState *dev) freq = imx25_ccm_get_ahb_clk(dev) / 2; - DPRINTF("freq = %d\n", freq); + DPRINTF("freq = %u\n", freq); return freq; } @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static uint32_t imx25_ccm_get_clock_frequency(IMXCCMState *dev, IMXClk clock) break; } - DPRINTF("Clock = %d) = %d\n", clock, freq); + DPRINTF("Clock = %d) = %u\n", clock, freq); return freq; } From patchwork Thu Nov 26 11:11:06 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Alex Chen X-Patchwork-Id: 1406548 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Chb9M1vfvz9sSs for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 22:28:23 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48052 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiFRl-0000Oz-0X for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:28:21 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35544) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiFNI-0004V0-Bj; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:23:44 -0500 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:2157) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiFND-0003rA-2z; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:23:44 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by szxga07-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Chb3L5nMJz73Mk; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 19:23:10 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.124.27) by DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 19:23:24 +0800 From: Alex Chen To: , , Subject: [PATCH 2/5] i.MX31: Fix bad printf format specifiers Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:11:06 +0000 Message-ID: <20201126111109.112238-3-alex.chen@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20201126111109.112238-1-alex.chen@huawei.com> References: <20201126111109.112238-1-alex.chen@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.124.27] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.35; envelope-from=alex.chen@huawei.com; helo=szxga07-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: alex.chen@huawei.com, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" We should use printf format specifier "%u" instead of "%d" for argument of type "unsigned int". Reported-by: Euler Robot Signed-off-by: Alex Chen --- hw/misc/imx31_ccm.c | 14 +++++++------- hw/misc/imx_ccm.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/misc/imx31_ccm.c b/hw/misc/imx31_ccm.c index 6e246827ab..ad30a4b2c0 100644 --- a/hw/misc/imx31_ccm.c +++ b/hw/misc/imx31_ccm.c @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static const char *imx31_ccm_reg_name(uint32_t reg) case IMX31_CCM_PDR2_REG: return "PDR2"; default: - sprintf(unknown, "[%d ?]", reg); + sprintf(unknown, "[%u ?]", reg); return unknown; } } @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static uint32_t imx31_ccm_get_pll_ref_clk(IMXCCMState *dev) freq = CKIH_FREQ; } - DPRINTF("freq = %d\n", freq); + DPRINTF("freq = %u\n", freq); return freq; } @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static uint32_t imx31_ccm_get_mpll_clk(IMXCCMState *dev) freq = imx_ccm_calc_pll(s->reg[IMX31_CCM_MPCTL_REG], imx31_ccm_get_pll_ref_clk(dev)); - DPRINTF("freq = %d\n", freq); + DPRINTF("freq = %u\n", freq); return freq; } @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static uint32_t imx31_ccm_get_mcu_main_clk(IMXCCMState *dev) freq = imx31_ccm_get_mpll_clk(dev); } - DPRINTF("freq = %d\n", freq); + DPRINTF("freq = %u\n", freq); return freq; } @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static uint32_t imx31_ccm_get_hclk_clk(IMXCCMState *dev) freq = imx31_ccm_get_mcu_main_clk(dev) / (1 + EXTRACT(s->reg[IMX31_CCM_PDR0_REG], MAX)); - DPRINTF("freq = %d\n", freq); + DPRINTF("freq = %u\n", freq); return freq; } @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static uint32_t imx31_ccm_get_ipg_clk(IMXCCMState *dev) freq = imx31_ccm_get_hclk_clk(dev) / (1 + EXTRACT(s->reg[IMX31_CCM_PDR0_REG], IPG)); - DPRINTF("freq = %d\n", freq); + DPRINTF("freq = %u\n", freq); return freq; } @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ static uint32_t imx31_ccm_get_clock_frequency(IMXCCMState *dev, IMXClk clock) break; } - DPRINTF("Clock = %d) = %d\n", clock, freq); + DPRINTF("Clock = %d) = %u\n", clock, freq); return freq; } diff --git a/hw/misc/imx_ccm.c b/hw/misc/imx_ccm.c index 52882071d3..08a50ee4c8 100644 --- a/hw/misc/imx_ccm.c +++ b/hw/misc/imx_ccm.c @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ uint32_t imx_ccm_get_clock_frequency(IMXCCMState *dev, IMXClk clock) freq = klass->get_clock_frequency(dev, clock); } - DPRINTF("(clock = %d) = %d\n", clock, freq); + DPRINTF("(clock = %d) = %u\n", clock, freq); return freq; } @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ uint32_t imx_ccm_calc_pll(uint32_t pllreg, uint32_t base_freq) freq = ((2 * (base_freq >> 10) * (mfi * mfd + mfn)) / (mfd * pd)) << 10; - DPRINTF("(pllreg = 0x%08x, base_freq = %d) = %d\n", pllreg, base_freq, + DPRINTF("(pllreg = 0x%08x, base_freq = %u) = %d\n", pllreg, base_freq, freq); return freq; From patchwork Thu Nov 26 11:11:07 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Alex Chen X-Patchwork-Id: 1406549 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Chb9V6Fxzz9sVW for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 22:28:30 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48812 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiFRs-0000jI-6y for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:28:28 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiFNO-0004Zk-5a; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:23:50 -0500 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:2805) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiFND-0003rD-45; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:23:49 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Chb3D2tWRzkbpC; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 19:23:04 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.124.27) by DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 19:23:25 +0800 From: Alex Chen To: , , Subject: [PATCH 3/5] i.MX6: Fix bad printf format specifiers Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:11:07 +0000 Message-ID: <20201126111109.112238-4-alex.chen@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20201126111109.112238-1-alex.chen@huawei.com> References: <20201126111109.112238-1-alex.chen@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.124.27] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.190; envelope-from=alex.chen@huawei.com; helo=szxga04-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: alex.chen@huawei.com, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" We should use printf format specifier "%u" instead of "%d" for argument of type "unsigned int". Reported-by: Euler Robot Signed-off-by: Alex Chen --- hw/misc/imx6_ccm.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- hw/misc/imx6_src.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/misc/imx6_ccm.c b/hw/misc/imx6_ccm.c index 7fec8f0a47..cb740427ec 100644 --- a/hw/misc/imx6_ccm.c +++ b/hw/misc/imx6_ccm.c @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static const char *imx6_ccm_reg_name(uint32_t reg) case CCM_CMEOR: return "CMEOR"; default: - sprintf(unknown, "%d ?", reg); + sprintf(unknown, "%u ?", reg); return unknown; } } @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static const char *imx6_analog_reg_name(uint32_t reg) case USB_ANALOG_DIGPROG: return "USB_ANALOG_DIGPROG"; default: - sprintf(unknown, "%d ?", reg); + sprintf(unknown, "%u ?", reg); return unknown; } } @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static uint64_t imx6_analog_get_pll2_clk(IMX6CCMState *dev) freq *= 20; } - DPRINTF("freq = %d\n", (uint32_t)freq); + DPRINTF("freq = %u\n", (uint32_t)freq); return freq; } @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static uint64_t imx6_analog_get_pll2_pfd0_clk(IMX6CCMState *dev) freq = imx6_analog_get_pll2_clk(dev) * 18 / EXTRACT(dev->analog[CCM_ANALOG_PFD_528], PFD0_FRAC); - DPRINTF("freq = %d\n", (uint32_t)freq); + DPRINTF("freq = %u\n", (uint32_t)freq); return freq; } @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static uint64_t imx6_analog_get_pll2_pfd2_clk(IMX6CCMState *dev) freq = imx6_analog_get_pll2_clk(dev) * 18 / EXTRACT(dev->analog[CCM_ANALOG_PFD_528], PFD2_FRAC); - DPRINTF("freq = %d\n", (uint32_t)freq); + DPRINTF("freq = %u\n", (uint32_t)freq); return freq; } @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static uint64_t imx6_analog_get_periph_clk(IMX6CCMState *dev) break; } - DPRINTF("freq = %d\n", (uint32_t)freq); + DPRINTF("freq = %u\n", (uint32_t)freq); return freq; } @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static uint64_t imx6_ccm_get_ahb_clk(IMX6CCMState *dev) freq = imx6_analog_get_periph_clk(dev) / (1 + EXTRACT(dev->ccm[CCM_CBCDR], AHB_PODF)); - DPRINTF("freq = %d\n", (uint32_t)freq); + DPRINTF("freq = %u\n", (uint32_t)freq); return freq; } @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static uint64_t imx6_ccm_get_ipg_clk(IMX6CCMState *dev) freq = imx6_ccm_get_ahb_clk(dev) / (1 + EXTRACT(dev->ccm[CCM_CBCDR], IPG_PODF)); - DPRINTF("freq = %d\n", (uint32_t)freq); + DPRINTF("freq = %u\n", (uint32_t)freq); return freq; } @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ static uint64_t imx6_ccm_get_per_clk(IMX6CCMState *dev) freq = imx6_ccm_get_ipg_clk(dev) / (1 + EXTRACT(dev->ccm[CCM_CSCMR1], PERCLK_PODF)); - DPRINTF("freq = %d\n", (uint32_t)freq); + DPRINTF("freq = %u\n", (uint32_t)freq); return freq; } @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static uint32_t imx6_ccm_get_clock_frequency(IMXCCMState *dev, IMXClk clock) break; } - DPRINTF("Clock = %d) = %d\n", clock, freq); + DPRINTF("Clock = %d) = %u\n", clock, freq); return freq; } diff --git a/hw/misc/imx6_src.c b/hw/misc/imx6_src.c index dd99cc7acf..79f4375911 100644 --- a/hw/misc/imx6_src.c +++ b/hw/misc/imx6_src.c @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static const char *imx6_src_reg_name(uint32_t reg) case SRC_GPR10: return "SRC_GPR10"; default: - sprintf(unknown, "%d ?", reg); + sprintf(unknown, "%u ?", reg); return unknown; } } From patchwork Thu Nov 26 11:11:08 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Alex Chen X-Patchwork-Id: 1406546 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Chb7K5x5Vz9sSs for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 22:26:37 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43732 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiFQ3-00072m-Ng for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:26:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35550) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiFNJ-0004WS-9D; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:23:45 -0500 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:2541) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiFNF-0003sm-Qj; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:23:44 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Chb3R4d0Fzhhfx; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 19:23:15 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.124.27) by DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 19:23:25 +0800 From: Alex Chen To: , , Subject: [PATCH 4/5] i.MX6ul: Fix bad printf format specifiers Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:11:08 +0000 Message-ID: <20201126111109.112238-5-alex.chen@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20201126111109.112238-1-alex.chen@huawei.com> References: <20201126111109.112238-1-alex.chen@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.124.27] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.191; envelope-from=alex.chen@huawei.com; helo=szxga05-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: alex.chen@huawei.com, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" We should use printf format specifier "%u" instead of "%d" for argument of type "unsigned int". Reported-by: Euler Robot Signed-off-by: Alex Chen --- hw/misc/imx6ul_ccm.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/misc/imx6ul_ccm.c b/hw/misc/imx6ul_ccm.c index 5e0661dacf..a65d031455 100644 --- a/hw/misc/imx6ul_ccm.c +++ b/hw/misc/imx6ul_ccm.c @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static const char *imx6ul_ccm_reg_name(uint32_t reg) case CCM_CMEOR: return "CMEOR"; default: - sprintf(unknown, "%d ?", reg); + sprintf(unknown, "%u ?", reg); return unknown; } } @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static const char *imx6ul_analog_reg_name(uint32_t reg) case USB_ANALOG_DIGPROG: return "USB_ANALOG_DIGPROG"; default: - sprintf(unknown, "%d ?", reg); + sprintf(unknown, "%u ?", reg); return unknown; } } From patchwork Thu Nov 26 11:11:09 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Alex Chen X-Patchwork-Id: 1406543 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Chb5S1WLmz9sVL for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 22:25:00 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39244 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiFOU-00052l-6h for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:24:58 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35558) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiFNN-0004Yt-Np; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:23:49 -0500 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:2540) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiFNF-0003sl-Pk; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:23:49 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Chb3R4Q4Hzhh8q; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 19:23:15 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.124.27) by DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 19:23:26 +0800 From: Alex Chen To: , , Subject: [PATCH 5/5] misc/omap_sdrc: Fix bad printf format specifiers Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:11:09 +0000 Message-ID: <20201126111109.112238-6-alex.chen@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20201126111109.112238-1-alex.chen@huawei.com> References: <20201126111109.112238-1-alex.chen@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.124.27] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.191; envelope-from=alex.chen@huawei.com; helo=szxga05-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: alex.chen@huawei.com, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" We should use printf format specifier "%u" instead of "%d" for argument of type "unsigned int". Reported-by: Euler Robot Signed-off-by: Alex Chen --- hw/misc/omap_sdrc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/misc/omap_sdrc.c b/hw/misc/omap_sdrc.c index f2f72f6810..c142fe0882 100644 --- a/hw/misc/omap_sdrc.c +++ b/hw/misc/omap_sdrc.c @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static void omap_sdrc_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, case 0x10: /* SDRC_SYSCONFIG */ if ((value >> 3) != 0x2) - fprintf(stderr, "%s: bad SDRAM idle mode %i\n", + fprintf(stderr, "%s: bad SDRAM idle mode %u\n", __func__, (unsigned)value >> 3); if (value & 2) omap_sdrc_reset(s);