From patchwork Thu Nov 26 06:33:37 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Andrew Jeffery X-Patchwork-Id: 1406418 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ChSfJ6G7Dz9sVD for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:34:32 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=aj.id.au Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=aj.id.au header.i=@aj.id.au header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=ieJnHukI; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=aq1sPllf; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ChSfJ2Q49zDr7K for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:34:32 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=aj.id.au (client-ip=66.111.4.26; helo=out2-smtp.messagingengine.com; envelope-from=andrew@aj.id.au; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=aj.id.au Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=aj.id.au header.i=@aj.id.au header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=ieJnHukI; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=aq1sPllf; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ChSf5011BzDr0k; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:34:20 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FF45C0170; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 01:34:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 01:34:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aj.id.au; h=from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; s=fm1; bh=LM/6syswR/TQC0khtK3z7jyG15 eRUPMaixWhJ0PAO+Q=; b=ieJnHukIWBS9UvDusn03XU9iAbEe5i4FM++CRwRojs XR4cunNolOQgd3eBSei6UNbxX2zDY1+T2TwGz+dUblZ5CdvItdfesU/p/CtMLgNk gjQkAeFcPblHLFCSYxCMv4UjQlwte85MhnOMo8g8MhPe86kXL40TpDi+UbgdpFDQ 2z6KbgXoOCwMUR0v5XVEOnoEdHQ0HIgZBybt3WMmUPgFgkgAg2I9ACYZcPPi+Zu1 1GKPGriYt5psACLi3J8V95ObxHVjkbrinNhtDd2Hyn3N1SdkqB+ZtcN+fqbc145r AzCs0P4GO2k/Q44D0D7XeRaxqf71DYD6raSteCE//zIQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:date:from :message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=LM/6syswR/TQC0kht K3z7jyG15eRUPMaixWhJ0PAO+Q=; b=aq1sPllfWvE+7PynW7a8zTDgOeIWUIrGj EMKdtwMK2n6av2TIbtU5To89Elhn1wJLjt14oG/ZnG+W/KClb8bUGm0Zwq1mn0bk an+EAniiB7KLqPQIXpxdRnnqxXMtWoyM2Oup5kb0Ea01z3LhLlKEP2bByaoGVDxz dMU7Rr3lQdf6lQHh4K/c1KRgWeWNMFwuPWCQojonQ2fpSuY7QIgxltruqKkr2Knz IBudK508YFZa3Ggi/zDh6TNgofP4Qa2wPI8QlYFHXlvN9V/D01kTOvlNDBkaMJ8/ 3dccsqhsPoFGUnyDf/NqUsb/lqQW1xP3UKKqXP+wMKPUeoqRj2Cew== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudehuddgleekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkofgggfestdekredtre dttdenucfhrhhomheptehnughrvgifucflvghffhgvrhihuceorghnughrvgifsegrjhdr ihgurdgruheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkefhieffjeevfeevhedtieeihfefvdejle dvvddthefftedujeethfeuueelfedtnecukfhppedvtdefrdehjedrvddtkedrudegieen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrnhgurh gvfiesrghjrdhiugdrrghu X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost.localdomain (203-57-208-146.dyn.iinet.net.au [203.57.208.146]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0F2ED328005D; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 01:34:12 -0500 (EST) From: Andrew Jeffery To: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: aspeed: Fix GPIO requests on pass-through banks Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:03:37 +1030 Message-Id: <20201126063337.489927-1-andrew@aj.id.au> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux ASPEED SoC development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: sashal@kernel.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-aspeed-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linux-aspeed" Commit 6726fbff19bf ("pinctrl: aspeed: Fix GPI only function problem.") fixes access to GPIO banks T and U on the AST2600. Both banks contain input-only pins and the GPIO pin function is named GPITx and GPIUx respectively. Unfortunately the fix had a negative impact on GPIO banks D and E for the AST2400 and AST2500 where the GPIO pass-through functions take similar "GPI"-style names. The net effect on the older SoCs was that when the GPIO subsystem requested a pin in banks D or E be muxed for GPIO, they were instead muxed for pass-through mode. Mistakenly muxing pass-through mode e.g. breaks booting the host on IBM's Witherspoon (AC922) platform where GPIOE0 is used for FSI. Further exploit the names in the provided expression structure to differentiate pass-through from pin-specific GPIO modes. This follow-up fix gives the expected behaviour for the following tests: Witherspoon BMC (AST2500): 1. Power-on the Witherspoon host 2. Request GPIOD1 be muxed via /sys/class/gpio/export 3. Request GPIOE1 be muxed via /sys/class/gpio/export 4. Request the balls for GPIOs E2 and E3 be muxed as GPIO pass-through ("GPIE2" mode) via a pinctrl hog in the devicetree Rainier BMC (AST2600): 5. Request GPIT0 be muxed via /sys/class/gpio/export 6. Request GPIU0 be muxed via /sys/class/gpio/export Together the tests demonstrate that all three pieces of functionality (general GPIOs via 1, 2 and 3, input-only GPIOs via 5 and 6, pass-through mode via 4) operate as desired across old and new SoCs. Fixes: 6726fbff19bf ("pinctrl: aspeed: Fix GPI only function problem.") Cc: Billy Tsai Cc: Joel Stanley Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley Tested-by: Joel Stanley --- drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++-- drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h | 7 ++- 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c index 1d603732903f..9c44ef11b567 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c @@ -286,14 +286,76 @@ int aspeed_pinmux_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int function, static bool aspeed_expr_is_gpio(const struct aspeed_sig_expr *expr) { /* - * The signal type is GPIO if the signal name has "GPI" as a prefix. - * strncmp (rather than strcmp) is used to implement the prefix - * requirement. + * We need to differentiate between GPIO and non-GPIO signals to + * implement the gpio_request_enable() interface. For better or worse + * the ASPEED pinctrl driver uses the expression names to determine + * whether an expression will mux a pin for GPIO. * - * expr->signal might look like "GPIOB1" in the GPIO case. - * expr->signal might look like "GPIT0" in the GPI case. + * Generally we have the following - A GPIO such as B1 has: + * + * - expr->signal set to "GPIOB1" + * - expr->function set to "GPIOB1" + * + * Using this fact we can determine whether the provided expression is + * a GPIO expression by testing the signal name for the string prefix + * "GPIO". + * + * However, some GPIOs are input-only, and the ASPEED datasheets name + * them differently. An input-only GPIO such as T0 has: + * + * - expr->signal set to "GPIT0" + * - expr->function set to "GPIT0" + * + * It's tempting to generalise the prefix test from "GPIO" to "GPI" to + * account for both GPIOs and GPIs, but in doing so we run aground on + * another feature: + * + * Some pins in the ASPEED BMC SoCs have a "pass-through" GPIO + * function where the input state of one pin is replicated as the + * output state of another (as if they were shorted together - a mux + * configuration that is typically enabled by hardware strapping). + * This feature allows the BMC to pass e.g. power button state through + * to the host while the BMC is yet to boot, but take control of the + * button state once the BMC has booted by muxing each pin as a + * separate, pin-specific GPIO. + * + * Conceptually this pass-through mode is a form of GPIO and is named + * as such in the datasheets, e.g. "GPID0". This naming similarity + * trips us up with the simple GPI-prefixed-signal-name scheme + * discussed above, as the pass-through configuration is not what we + * want when muxing a pin as GPIO for the GPIO subsystem. + * + * On e.g. the AST2400, a pass-through function "GPID0" is grouped on + * balls A18 and D16, where we have: + * + * For ball A18: + * - expr->signal set to "GPID0IN" + * - expr->function set to "GPID0" + * + * For ball D16: + * - expr->signal set to "GPID0OUT" + * - expr->function set to "GPID0" + * + * By contrast, the pin-specific GPIO expressions for the same pins are + * as follows: + * + * For ball A18: + * - expr->signal looks like "GPIOD0" + * - expr->function looks like "GPIOD0" + * + * For ball D16: + * - expr->signal looks like "GPIOD1" + * - expr->function looks like "GPIOD1" + * + * Testing both the signal _and_ function names gives us the means + * differentiate the pass-through GPIO pinmux configuration from the + * pin-specific configuration that the GPIO subsystem is after: An + * expression is a pin-specific (non-pass-through) GPIO configuration + * if the signal prefix is "GPI" and the signal name matches the + * function name. */ - return strncmp(expr->signal, "GPI", 3) == 0; + return !strncmp(expr->signal, "GPI", 3) && + !strcmp(expr->signal, expr->function); } static bool aspeed_gpio_in_exprs(const struct aspeed_sig_expr **exprs) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h index f86739e800c3..dba5875ff276 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h @@ -452,10 +452,11 @@ struct aspeed_sig_desc { * evaluation of the descriptors. * * @signal: The signal name for the priority level on the pin. If the signal - * type is GPIO, then the signal name must begin with the string - * "GPIO", e.g. GPIOA0, GPIOT4 etc. + * type is GPIO, then the signal name must begin with the + * prefix "GPI", e.g. GPIOA0, GPIT0 etc. * @function: The name of the function the signal participates in for the - * associated expression + * associated expression. For pin-specific GPIO, the function + * name must match the signal name. * @ndescs: The number of signal descriptors in the expression * @descs: Pointer to an array of signal descriptors that comprise the * function expression