From patchwork Tue Aug 18 08:43:09 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kai-Heng Feng X-Patchwork-Id: 1346716 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ubuntu.com (client-ip=91.189.94.19; helo=huckleberry.canonical.com; envelope-from=kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=canonical.com Received: from huckleberry.canonical.com (huckleberry.canonical.com [91.189.94.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BW4F61NMJz9sR4; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 18:43:22 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=huckleberry.canonical.com) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k7xDD-0005t7-0j; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:43:19 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k7xDB-0005sn-CL for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:43:17 +0000 Received: from 61-220-137-37.hinet-ip.hinet.net ([61.220.137.37] helo=localhost) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k7xDA-0008Kz-Lu for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:43:17 +0000 From: Kai-Heng Feng To: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [PATCH 1/1] HID: i2c-hid: Always sleep 60ms after I2C_HID_PWR_ON commands Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 16:43:09 +0800 Message-Id: <20200818084309.7114-2-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200818084309.7114-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> References: <20200818084309.7114-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Sender: "kernel-team" From: Hans de Goede BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891998 Before this commit i2c_hid_parse() consists of the following steps: 1. Send power on cmd 2. usleep_range(1000, 5000) 3. Send reset cmd 4. Wait for reset to complete (device interrupt, or msleep(100)) 5. Send power on cmd 6. Try to read HID descriptor Notice how there is an usleep_range(1000, 5000) after the first power-on command, but not after the second power-on command. Testing has shown that at least on the BMAX Y13 laptop's i2c-hid touchpad, not having a delay after the second power-on command causes the HID descriptor to read as all zeros. In case we hit this on other devices too, the descriptor being all zeros can be recognized by the following message being logged many, many times: hid-generic 0018:0911:5288.0002: unknown main item tag 0x0 At the same time as the BMAX Y13's touchpad issue was debugged, Kai-Heng was working on debugging some issues with Goodix i2c-hid touchpads. It turns out that these need a delay after a PWR_ON command too, otherwise they stop working after a suspend/resume cycle. According to Goodix a delay of minimal 60ms is needed. Having multiple cases where we need a delay after sending the power-on command, seems to indicate that we should always sleep after the power-on command. This commit fixes the mentioned issues by moving the existing 1ms sleep to the i2c_hid_set_power() function and changing it to a 60ms sleep. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208247 Reported-by: Kai-Heng Feng Reported-and-tested-by: Andrea Borgia Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina (cherry picked from commit eef4016243e94c438f177ca8226876eb873b9c75 linux-next) Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng Acked-by: Stefan Bader --- drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-core.c | 22 +++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-core.c index 294c84e136d7..dbd04492825d 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-core.c +++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-core.c @@ -420,6 +420,19 @@ static int i2c_hid_set_power(struct i2c_client *client, int power_state) dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to change power setting.\n"); set_pwr_exit: + + /* + * The HID over I2C specification states that if a DEVICE needs time + * after the PWR_ON request, it should utilise CLOCK stretching. + * However, it has been observered that the Windows driver provides a + * 1ms sleep between the PWR_ON and RESET requests. + * According to Goodix Windows even waits 60 ms after (other?) + * PWR_ON requests. Testing has confirmed that several devices + * will not work properly without a delay after a PWR_ON request. + */ + if (!ret && power_state == I2C_HID_PWR_ON) + msleep(60); + return ret; } @@ -441,15 +454,6 @@ static int i2c_hid_hwreset(struct i2c_client *client) if (ret) goto out_unlock; - /* - * The HID over I2C specification states that if a DEVICE needs time - * after the PWR_ON request, it should utilise CLOCK stretching. - * However, it has been observered that the Windows driver provides a - * 1ms sleep between the PWR_ON and RESET requests and that some devices - * rely on this. - */ - usleep_range(1000, 5000); - i2c_hid_dbg(ihid, "resetting...\n"); ret = i2c_hid_command(client, &hid_reset_cmd, NULL, 0);