From patchwork Fri Jan 10 01:12:28 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Michael Meissner X-Patchwork-Id: 1220727 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org (client-ip=209.132.180.131; helo=sourceware.org; envelope-from=gcc-patches-return-517067-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.a=rsa-sha1 header.s=default header.b=spcpiUv/; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47v4jB3yJ9z9sR1 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 12:12:44 +1100 (AEDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=gycL/txnQSAKKzdIooD731N7d6iQ/V KbtZEn3wEA1o73tmO8T8v3YSB9StVuVbAWDbpAZjzIdKZAPwm6SoDJ4xKWIZIWzJ xbYNm5VbmSmZG846FrWp7DZzI0nOLsbd4DM1UCC7dmed8qyx6LmrMDCCN9Av+lmx jVXWmljQlg1LY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=default; bh=D/xzSNrjFK89ugQIJ5smvM257nE=; b=spcp iUv/p9BDdaLgWuxAKEaPfqffI+6CHopky2t7snibbaR1+tGoHPO4i7i4nV7BuPCN 0HNFJPxY7T2TkTPBIPhVYQxOzsDryrKy5fNI+3EDffrsCaOIT4WTkJMsLpqzOhCY PHgBiH89tO9OgTgOUUPsVKX8W8lR89V8SJDXkyg= Received: (qmail 18465 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2020 01:12:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18409 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jan 2020 01:12:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_2, GIT_PATCH_3, KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (HELO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) (148.163.156.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 01:12:35 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 00A1CT2w004179; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 20:12:34 -0500 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2xe7m2xm24-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 09 Jan 2020 20:12:33 -0500 Received: from m0098404.ppops.net (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 00A1CVRJ004365; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 20:12:33 -0500 Received: from ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (83.d6.3fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.63.214.131]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2xe7m2xm1t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 09 Jan 2020 20:12:33 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 00A1BFao022911; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 01:12:32 GMT Received: from b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.15]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2xajb7f2ta-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jan 2020 01:12:32 +0000 Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.235]) by b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 00A1CUBg46399784 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 10 Jan 2020 01:12:30 GMT Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8454478060; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 01:12:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010AA7805C; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 01:12:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ibm-toto.the-meissners.org (unknown [9.32.77.177]) by b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 01:12:29 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 20:12:28 -0500 From: Michael Meissner To: Michael Meissner , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Segher Boessenkool , David Edelsohn Subject: [PATCH] V12 patch #14 of 14, Add tests for generating prefixed instructions when using vec_extract with large offsets with -mcpu=future Message-ID: <20200110011227.GN30103@ibm-toto.the-meissners.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Meissner , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Segher Boessenkool , David Edelsohn References: <20200109225010.GA21999@ibm-toto.the-meissners.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200109225010.GA21999@ibm-toto.the-meissners.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) While this patch is similar in spirit to V11 #15, I lost that patch, and I re-implemented the check. Can I check this test into the trunk? 2020-01-09 Michael Meissner * gcc.target/powerpc/vec-extract-large-si.c: New test for vec_extract from a vector unsigned int in memory with a large offset. * gcc.target/powerpc/vec-extract-large-di.c: New test for vec_extract from a vector long in memory with a large offset. * gcc.target/powerpc/vec-extract-large-sf.c: New test for vec_extract from a vector float in memory with a large offset. * gcc.target/powerpc/vec-extract-large-df.c: New test for vec_extract from a vector double in memory with a large offset. Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-extract-large-df.c =================================================================== --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-extract-large-df.c (revision 280092) +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-extract-large-df.c (working copy) @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_prefixed_addr } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=future" } */ + +/* Test if we can support vec_extract on V2DF vectors with a large numeric + offset address. */ + +#include + +#ifndef TYPE +#define TYPE double +#endif + +#ifndef OFFSET +#define OFFSET 0x12345 +#endif + +TYPE +get0 (vector TYPE *p) +{ + return vec_extract (p[OFFSET], 0); +} + +TYPE +get1 (vector TYPE *p) +{ + return vec_extract (p[OFFSET], 1); +} + +TYPE +getn (vector TYPE *p, unsigned long n) +{ + return vec_extract (p[OFFSET], n); +} + +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mplfd\M} 2 } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mpaddi\M} 1 } } */ Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-extract-large-di.c =================================================================== --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-extract-large-di.c (revision 280092) +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-extract-large-di.c (working copy) @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_prefixed_addr } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=future" } */ + +/* Test if we can support vec_extract on V2DI vectors with a large numeric + offset address. */ + +#include + +#ifndef TYPE +#define TYPE unsigned long long +#endif + +#ifndef OFFSET +#define OFFSET 0x12345 +#endif + +TYPE +get0 (vector TYPE *p) +{ + return vec_extract (p[OFFSET], 0); +} + +TYPE +get1 (vector TYPE *p) +{ + return vec_extract (p[OFFSET], 1); +} + +TYPE +getn (vector TYPE *p, unsigned long n) +{ + return vec_extract (p[OFFSET], n); +} + +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mpld\M} 2 } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mpaddi\M} 1 } } */ Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-extract-large-sf.c =================================================================== --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-extract-large-sf.c (revision 280092) +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-extract-large-sf.c (working copy) @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_prefixed_addr } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=future" } */ + +/* Test if we can support vec_extract on V4SF vectors with a large numeric + offset address. */ + +#include + +#ifndef TYPE +#define TYPE float +#endif + +#ifndef OFFSET +#define OFFSET 0x12345 +#endif + +TYPE +get0 (vector TYPE *p) +{ + return vec_extract (p[OFFSET], 0); +} + +TYPE +get1 (vector TYPE *p) +{ + return vec_extract (p[OFFSET], 1); +} + +TYPE +getn (vector TYPE *p, unsigned long n) +{ + return vec_extract (p[OFFSET], n); +} + +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mplfs\M} 2 } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mpaddi\M} 1 } } */ Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-extract-large-si.c =================================================================== --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-extract-large-si.c (revision 280092) +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-extract-large-si.c (working copy) @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_prefixed_addr } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=future" } */ + +/* Test if we can support vec_extract on V4SI vectors with a large numeric + offset address. */ + +#include + +#ifndef TYPE +#define TYPE unsigned int +#endif + +#ifndef OFFSET +#define OFFSET 0x12345 +#endif + +TYPE +get0 (vector TYPE *p) +{ + return vec_extract (p[OFFSET], 0); +} + +TYPE +get1 (vector TYPE *p) +{ + return vec_extract (p[OFFSET], 1); +} + +TYPE +getn (vector TYPE *p, unsigned long n) +{ + return vec_extract (p[OFFSET], n); +} + +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mplwz\M} 2 } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mpaddi\M} 1 } } */