From patchwork Wed Apr 10 14:55:33 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Wakely X-Patchwork-Id: 1083465 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org (client-ip=209.132.180.131; helo=sourceware.org; envelope-from=gcc-patches-return-499062-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.b="va+RB2pC"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44fRzk089Zz9s9h for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 00:55:44 +1000 (AEST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s= default; b=YZUyHLoQ6u/8zW+a4pUM7p0ixUFRP5KQpXu0sY34HUgWFuBtegSWO kYv3+w0gvBe0aJckS6jnbNhZiI/bT84ObcQWarqiEzbfs15fcXDXwa2nzezumzUE 6ZNncglXiM+YSAxijmks0ZSW+mqLwRQawEObMUjTpqOvvfY+jHOfvs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= default; bh=Nj5QVG2pXqmCW9u7Ia4lj/zcXKg=; b=va+RB2pCFc1VMMYOQ4GN O0QMxMIlUE2vQLb7woiipIVQdDzo/N04DtGKervpA9eZaIpRtDcoja53LhCKk+2V 3yeYFuSOE1hm9hWgINkpghfelos6nByAFmfSAGc7OO91qpMB2EI1L7I1BqBIh6DA 7GSFVXyxE8wsNcnI8LwcEaE= Received: (qmail 96517 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2019 14:55:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 95963 invoked by uid 89); 10 Apr 2019 14:55:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-14.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_0, GIT_PATCH_1, GIT_PATCH_2, GIT_PATCH_3, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=stacks X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:55:35 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50C5B3086204 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:55:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.33.36.13]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B6519C58 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:55:33 +0100 From: Jonathan Wakely To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] Change wording of -fipa-icf documentation Message-ID: <20190410145533.GA4314@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) * doc/invoke.texi (Optimize Options): Change "Nevertheless" to "Although" in -fipa-icf documentation. THe old wording doesn't make sense, so committed to trunk as obvious. commit a2a452bc8191a7ec0ec910a44484c1aab89154d6 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date: Wed Apr 10 15:49:50 2019 +0100 Change wording of -fipa-icf documentation * doc/invoke.texi (Optimize Options): Change "Nevertheless" to "Although" in -fipa-icf documentation. diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi index 73a7789d879..755b9f754a1 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi @@ -9359,7 +9359,7 @@ The optimization reduces code size and may disturb unwind stacks by replacing a function by equivalent one with a different name. The optimization works more effectively with link-time optimization enabled. -Nevertheless the behavior is similar to Gold Linker ICF optimization, GCC ICF +Although the behavior is similar to the Gold Linker's ICF optimization, GCC ICF works on different levels and thus the optimizations are not same - there are equivalences that are found only by GCC and equivalences found only by Gold.