From patchwork Tue Dec 7 04:58:13 2010 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Bryan Wu X-Patchwork-Id: 74489 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from chlorine.canonical.com (chlorine.canonical.com [91.189.94.204]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B507B6F07 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 15:58:48 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPpdM-0007Rn-PL; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 04:58:36 +0000 Received: from mail-qw0-f49.google.com ([209.85.216.49]) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPpdK-0007RA-IN for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 04:58:34 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so509419qwj.8 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:58:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.60.73 with SMTP id o9mr4010155qah.58.1291697913885; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:58:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.158.213 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 20:58:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CFD78C8.5000802@tpi.com> References: <4CFD5CD1.6000607@canonical.com> <4CFD78C8.5000802@tpi.com> From: Bryan Wu Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 12:58:13 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: jVmq2igckSzg_S7718L2zsEelsI Message-ID: Subject: Re: Natty ti-omap4 To: tim.gardner@canonical.com Cc: Kernel team list X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Tim Gardner wrote: > On 12/06/2010 04:29 PM, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote: >> >> Tim, >> >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Tim Gardner >>  wrote: >>> >>> Bryan - I pushed a natty ti-omap4 branch which was initially based on >>> Maverick ti-omap4 2.6.35-903.19. The new package version is >>> 2.6.35-1100.1, but I'm still working on some build problems. I should >> >> is there any difference between -903.19 and -1100.1? Can you explain >> what you've done? >> > > No difference between Maverick and Natty other then packaging. The ABI has > to be different so that there is no conflict with binary package names. > Great, that's a good start point for us. I've found the reason of the building failure. There is no 1100.0 change item in debian.ti-omap4/changelog. >>> have it fixed tomorrow. I think you will fix it, since it needs to revert the 1100.1 commit. >>> >>> Any status updates on rolling ti-omap4 forward to 2.6.37? >> >> we don't have, and won't have a .37 BSP for OMAP4. TI is focusing on >> .35 for now because we are adding support for power management. the >> current plan is for us to deliver a new .35 kernel with power >> management for inclusion in natty. Sebastien will be working with >> Bryan to make this. We will have everything ported over to .38 in >> February, and we will submit pull request for natty at that time. >> > > OK, I guess we'll just carry the .35 kernel versions until y'all are ready > with .38 > Thanks Nico and Tim, I will try to handle that with help from Sebastien. diff --git a/debian.ti-omap4/abi/2.6.35-1100.0/abiname b/debian.ti-omap4/abi/2.6.35-1100.0/abiname index 71fb6fc..d878b32 100644 --- a/debian.ti-omap4/abi/2.6.35-1100.0/abiname +++ b/debian.ti-omap4/abi/2.6.35-1100.0/abiname @@ -1 +1 @@ -903 +1100 diff --git a/debian.ti-omap4/changelog b/debian.ti-omap4/changelog index 4cad52b..3cef788 100644 --- a/debian.ti-omap4/changelog +++ b/debian.ti-omap4/changelog @@ -4,6 +4,12 @@ linux-ti-omap4 (2.6.35-1100.1) natty; urgency=low -- Tim Gardner Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:29:35 -0700 +linux-ti-omap4 (2.6.35-1100.0) natty; urgency=low + + * Testing + + -- Bryan Wu Mon, 05 Dec 2010 14:29:35 -0700 + linux-ti-omap4 (2.6.35-903.19) maverick-proposed; urgency=low [ Upstream Kernel Changes ]