diff mbox series

[30/31,SRU,OEM-5.6] drm/i915: Restrict qgv points which don't have enough bandwidth.

Message ID 20200814065740.276039-31-vicamo.yang@canonical.com
State New
Headers show
Series Add TGL+ SAGV display support | expand

Commit Message

You-Sheng Yang Aug. 14, 2020, 6:57 a.m. UTC
From: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891451

According to BSpec 53998, we should try to
restrict qgv points, which can't provide
enough bandwidth for desired display configuration.

Currently we are just comparing against all of
those and take minimum(worst case).

v2: Fixed wrong PCode reply mask, removed hardcoded
    values.

v3: Forbid simultaneous legacy SAGV PCode requests and
    restricting qgv points. Put the actual restriction
    to commit function, added serialization(thanks to Ville)
    to prevent commit being applied out of order in case of
    nonblocking and/or nomodeset commits.

v4:
    - Minor code refactoring, fixed few typos(thanks to James Ausmus)
    - Change the naming of qgv point
      masking/unmasking functions(James Ausmus).
    - Simplify the masking/unmasking operation itself,
      as we don't need to mask only single point per request(James Ausmus)
    - Reject and stick to highest bandwidth point if SAGV
      can't be enabled(BSpec)

v5:
    - Add new mailbox reply codes, which seems to happen during boot
      time for TGL and indicate that QGV setting is not yet available.

v6:
    - Increase number of supported QGV points to be in sync with BSpec.

v7: - Rebased and resolved conflict to fix build failure.
    - Fix NUM_QGV_POINTS to 8 and moved that to header file(James Ausmus)

v8: - Don't report an error if we can't restrict qgv points, as SAGV
      can be disabled by BIOS, which is completely legal. So don't
      make CI panic. Instead if we detect that there is only 1 QGV
      point accessible just analyze if we can fit the required bandwidth
      requirements, but no need in restricting.

v9: - Fix wrong QGV transition if we have 0 planes and no SAGV
      simultaneously.

v10: - Fix CDCLK corruption, because of global state getting serialized
       without modeset, which caused copying of non-calculated cdclk
       to be copied to dev_priv(thanks to Ville for the hint).

v11: - Remove unneeded headers and spaces(Matthew Roper)
     - Remove unneeded intel_qgv_info qi struct from bw check and zero
       out the needed one(Matthew Roper)
     - Changed QGV error message to have more clear meaning(Matthew Roper)
     - Use state->modeset_set instead of any_ms(Matthew Roper)
     - Moved NUM_SAGV_POINTS from i915_reg.h to i915_drv.h where it's used
     - Keep using crtc_state->hw.active instead of .enable(Matthew Roper)
     - Moved unrelated changes to other patch(using latency as parameter
       for plane wm calculation, moved to SAGV refactoring patch)

v12: - Fix rebase conflict with own temporary SAGV/QGV fix.
     - Remove unnecessary mask being zero check when unmasking
       qgv points as this is completely legal(Matt Roper)
     - Check if we are setting the same mask as already being set
       in hardware to prevent error from PCode.
     - Fix error message when restricting/unrestricting qgv points
       to "mask/unmask" which sounds more accurate(Matt Roper)
     - Move sagv status setting to icl_get_bw_info from atomic check
       as this should be calculated only once.(Matt Roper)
     - Edited comments for the case when we can't enable SAGV and
       use only 1 QGV point with highest bandwidth to be more
       understandable.(Matt Roper)

v13: - Moved max_data_rate in bw check to closer scope(Ville Syrjälä)
     - Changed comment for zero new_mask in qgv points masking function
       to better reflect reality(Ville Syrjälä)
     - Simplified bit mask operation in qgv points masking function
       (Ville Syrjälä)
     - Moved intel_qgv_points_mask closer to gen11 SAGV disabling,
       however this still can't be under modeset condition(Ville Syrjälä)
     - Packed qgv_points_mask as u8 and moved closer to pipe_sagv_mask
       (Ville Syrjälä)
     - Extracted PCode changes to separate patch.(Ville Syrjälä)
     - Now treat num_planes 0 same as 1 to avoid confusion and
       returning max_bw as 0, which would prevent choosing QGV
       point having max bandwidth in case if SAGV is not allowed,
       as per BSpec(Ville Syrjälä)
     - Do the actual qgv_points_mask swap in the same place as
       all other global state parts like cdclk are swapped.
       In the next patch, this all will be moved to bw state as
       global state, once new global state patch series from Ville
       lands

v14: - Now using global state to serialize access to qgv points
     - Added global state locking back, otherwise we seem to read
       bw state in a wrong way.

v15: - Added TODO comment for near atomic global state locking in
       bw code.

v16: - Fixed intel_atomic_bw_* functions to be intel_bw_* as discussed
       with Jani Nikula.
     - Take bw_state_changed flag into use.

v17: - Moved qgv point related manipulations next to SAGV code, as
       those are semantically related(Ville Syrjälä)
     - Renamed those into intel_sagv_(pre)|(post)_plane_update
       (Ville Syrjälä)

v18: - Move sagv related calls from commit tail into
       intel_sagv_(pre)|(post)_plane_update(Ville Syrjälä)

v19: - Use intel_atomic_get_bw_(old)|(new)_state which is intended
       for commit tail stage.

v20: - Return max bandwidth for 0 planes(Ville)
     - Constify old_bw_state in bw_atomic_check(Ville)
     - Removed some debugs(Ville)
     - Added data rate to debug print when no QGV points(Ville)
     - Removed some comments(Ville)

v21, v22, v23: - Fixed rebase conflict

v24: - Changed PCode mask to use ICL_ prefix
v25: - Resolved rebase conflict

v26: - Removed redundant NULL checks(Ville)
     - Removed redundant error prints(Ville)

v27: - Use device specific drm_err(Ville)
     - Fixed parenthesis ident reported by checkpatch
       Line over 100 warns to be fixed together with
       existing code style.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@intel.com>
Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
[vsyrjala: Drop duplicate intel_sagv_{pre,post}_plane_update() prototypes
           and drop unused NUM_SAGV_POINTS define]
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200514074853.9508-3-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com
(backported from commit 20f505f2253106f695ba6fa0a415159145a8fb2a
resolve conflicts due to DRM_DEBUG_KMS)
Signed-off-by: You-Sheng Yang <vicamo.yang@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h |   9 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c         |  53 ++++++++-
 3 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
index 9407476a936f..9783066ec34b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
@@ -8,6 +8,9 @@ 
 #include "intel_bw.h"
 #include "intel_display_types.h"
 #include "intel_sideband.h"
+#include "intel_atomic.h"
+#include "intel_pm.h"
+
 
 /* Parameters for Qclk Geyserville (QGV) */
 struct intel_qgv_point {
@@ -113,6 +116,26 @@  static int icl_pcode_read_qgv_point_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+int icl_pcode_restrict_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+				  u32 points_mask)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	/* bspec says to keep retrying for at least 1 ms */
+	ret = skl_pcode_request(dev_priv, ICL_PCODE_SAGV_DE_MEM_SS_CONFIG,
+				points_mask,
+				ICL_PCODE_POINTS_RESTRICTED_MASK,
+				ICL_PCODE_POINTS_RESTRICTED,
+				1);
+
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		drm_err(&dev_priv->drm, "Failed to disable qgv points (%d)\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int icl_get_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 			      struct intel_qgv_info *qi)
 {
@@ -236,6 +259,16 @@  static int icl_get_bw_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, const struct intel
 			break;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * In case if SAGV is disabled in BIOS, we always get 1
+	 * SAGV point, but we can't send PCode commands to restrict it
+	 * as it will fail and pointless anyway.
+	 */
+	if (qi.num_points == 1)
+		dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
+	else
+		dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_ENABLED;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -244,6 +277,11 @@  static unsigned int icl_max_bw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 {
 	int i;
 
+	/*
+	 * Let's return max bw for 0 planes
+	 */
+	num_planes = max(1, num_planes);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dev_priv->max_bw); i++) {
 		const struct intel_bw_info *bi =
 			&dev_priv->max_bw[i];
@@ -273,34 +311,6 @@  void intel_bw_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		icl_get_bw_info(dev_priv, &icl_sa_info);
 }
 
-static unsigned int intel_max_data_rate(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
-					int num_planes)
-{
-	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
-		/*
-		 * Any bw group has same amount of QGV points
-		 */
-		const struct intel_bw_info *bi =
-			&dev_priv->max_bw[0];
-		unsigned int min_bw = UINT_MAX;
-		int i;
-
-		/*
-		 * FIXME with SAGV disabled maybe we can assume
-		 * point 1 will always be used? Seems to match
-		 * the behaviour observed in the wild.
-		 */
-		for (i = 0; i < bi->num_qgv_points; i++) {
-			unsigned int bw = icl_max_bw(dev_priv, num_planes, i);
-
-			min_bw = min(bw, min_bw);
-		}
-		return min_bw;
-	} else {
-		return UINT_MAX;
-	}
-}
-
 static unsigned int intel_bw_crtc_num_active_planes(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 {
 	/*
@@ -410,10 +420,15 @@  int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
 	struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state, *old_crtc_state;
 	struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
-	unsigned int data_rate, max_data_rate;
+	const struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
+	unsigned int data_rate;
 	unsigned int num_active_planes;
 	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
 	int i, ret;
+	u32 allowed_points = 0;
+	unsigned int max_bw_point = 0, max_bw = 0;
+	unsigned int num_qgv_points = dev_priv->max_bw[0].num_qgv_points;
+	u32 mask = (1 << num_qgv_points) - 1;
 
 	/* FIXME earlier gens need some checks too */
 	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11)
@@ -459,18 +474,71 @@  int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 		return ret;
 
 	data_rate = intel_bw_data_rate(dev_priv, new_bw_state);
+	data_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP(data_rate, 1000);
+
 	num_active_planes = intel_bw_num_active_planes(dev_priv, new_bw_state);
 
-	max_data_rate = intel_max_data_rate(dev_priv, num_active_planes);
+	for (i = 0; i < num_qgv_points; i++) {
+		unsigned int max_data_rate;
 
-	data_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP(data_rate, 1000);
+		max_data_rate = icl_max_bw(dev_priv, num_active_planes, i);
+		/*
+		 * We need to know which qgv point gives us
+		 * maximum bandwidth in order to disable SAGV
+		 * if we find that we exceed SAGV block time
+		 * with watermarks. By that moment we already
+		 * have those, as it is calculated earlier in
+		 * intel_atomic_check,
+		 */
+		if (max_data_rate > max_bw) {
+			max_bw_point = i;
+			max_bw = max_data_rate;
+		}
+		if (max_data_rate >= data_rate)
+			allowed_points |= BIT(i);
+		drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "QGV point %d: max bw %d required %d\n",
+			    i, max_data_rate, data_rate);
+	}
 
-	if (data_rate > max_data_rate) {
-		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Bandwidth %u MB/s exceeds max available %d MB/s (%d active planes)\n",
-			      data_rate, max_data_rate, num_active_planes);
+	/*
+	 * BSpec states that we always should have at least one allowed point
+	 * left, so if we couldn't - simply reject the configuration for obvious
+	 * reasons.
+	 */
+	if (allowed_points == 0) {
+		drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "No QGV points provide sufficient memory"
+			    " bandwidth %d for display configuration(%d active planes).\n",
+			    data_rate, num_active_planes);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Leave only single point with highest bandwidth, if
+	 * we can't enable SAGV due to the increased memory latency it may
+	 * cause.
+	 */
+	if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state)) {
+		allowed_points = BIT(max_bw_point);
+		drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "No SAGV, using single QGV point %d\n",
+			    max_bw_point);
+	}
+	/*
+	 * We store the ones which need to be masked as that is what PCode
+	 * actually accepts as a parameter.
+	 */
+	new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask = ~allowed_points & mask;
+
+	old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
+	/*
+	 * If the actual mask had changed we need to make sure that
+	 * the commits are serialized(in case this is a nomodeset, nonblocking)
+	 */
+	if (new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask != old_bw_state->qgv_points_mask) {
+		ret = intel_atomic_serialize_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
index 898b4a85ccab..bbcaaa73ec1b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
@@ -24,6 +24,13 @@  struct intel_bw_state {
 	 */
 	u8 pipe_sagv_reject;
 
+	/*
+	 * Current QGV points mask, which restricts
+	 * some particular SAGV states, not to confuse
+	 * with pipe_sagv_mask.
+	 */
+	u8 qgv_points_mask;
+
 	unsigned int data_rate[I915_MAX_PIPES];
 	u8 num_active_planes[I915_MAX_PIPES];
 
@@ -47,5 +54,7 @@  int intel_bw_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
 int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
 void intel_bw_crtc_update(struct intel_bw_state *bw_state,
 			  const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
+int icl_pcode_restrict_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+				  u32 points_mask);
 
 #endif /* __INTEL_BW_H__ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 3100f491e9b4..055c2f08d80a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3748,6 +3748,8 @@  void intel_sagv_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
 	const struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state;
+	const struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state;
+	u32 new_mask = 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * Just return if we can't control SAGV or don't have it.
@@ -3763,14 +3765,42 @@  void intel_sagv_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 	if (!new_bw_state)
 		return;
 
-	if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state))
+	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11 && !intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state)) {
 		intel_disable_sagv(dev_priv);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
+	/*
+	 * Nothing to mask
+	 */
+	if (new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask == old_bw_state->qgv_points_mask)
+		return;
+
+	new_mask = old_bw_state->qgv_points_mask | new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask;
+
+	/*
+	 * If new mask is zero - means there is nothing to mask,
+	 * we can only unmask, which should be done in unmask.
+	 */
+	if (!new_mask)
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * Restrict required qgv points before updating the configuration.
+	 * According to BSpec we can't mask and unmask qgv points at the same
+	 * time. Also masking should be done before updating the configuration
+	 * and unmasking afterwards.
+	 */
+	icl_pcode_restrict_qgv_points(dev_priv, new_mask);
 }
 
 void intel_sagv_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
 	const struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state;
+	const struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state;
+	u32 new_mask = 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * Just return if we can't control SAGV or don't have it.
@@ -3786,8 +3816,27 @@  void intel_sagv_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 	if (!new_bw_state)
 		return;
 
-	if (intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state))
+	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11 && intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state)) {
 		intel_enable_sagv(dev_priv);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
+	/*
+	 * Nothing to unmask
+	 */
+	if (new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask == old_bw_state->qgv_points_mask)
+		return;
+
+	new_mask = new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask;
+
+	/*
+	 * Allow required qgv points after updating the configuration.
+	 * According to BSpec we can't mask and unmask qgv points at the same
+	 * time. Also masking should be done before updating the configuration
+	 * and unmasking afterwards.
+	 */
+	icl_pcode_restrict_qgv_points(dev_priv, new_mask);
 }
 
 static bool skl_crtc_can_enable_sagv(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)