diff mbox series

[Unstable] UBUNTU: SAUCE: drm/i915: Synchronize active and retire callbacks

Message ID 20200409212112.15182-1-sultan.alsawaf@canonical.com
State New
Headers show
Series [Unstable] UBUNTU: SAUCE: drm/i915: Synchronize active and retire callbacks | expand

Commit Message

Sultan Alsawaf April 9, 2020, 9:21 p.m. UTC
From: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>

Active and retire callbacks can run simultaneously, causing panics and
mayhem. The most notable case is with the intel_context_pin/unpin race
that causes ring and page table corruption. In 5.4, this race is more
noticeable because intel_ring_unpin() sets ring->vaddr to NULL and
causes a clean NULL-pointer-dereference panic, but in newer kernels this
race goes unnoticed.

Here is an example of a crash caused by this race on 5.4:
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000003448
RIP: 0010:gen8_emit_flush_render+0x163/0x190
Call Trace:
 execlists_request_alloc+0x25/0x40
 __i915_request_create+0x1f4/0x2c0
 i915_request_create+0x71/0xc0
 i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0xb98/0x1a80
 ? preempt_count_add+0x68/0xa0
 ? _raw_spin_lock+0x13/0x30
 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x16/0x30
 i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x1de/0x3c0
 ? i915_gem_busy_ioctl+0x7f/0x1d0
 ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x2d0/0x2d0
 drm_ioctl_kernel+0xb2/0x100
 drm_ioctl+0x209/0x360
 ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x2d0/0x2d0
 ksys_ioctl+0x87/0xc0
 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
 do_syscall_64+0x4e/0x150
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

Protect the active and retire callbacks with their own lock to prevent
them from running at the same time as one another.

Fixes: 12c255b5dad1 ("drm/i915: Provide an i915_active.acquire callback")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>
Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan.alsawaf@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c       | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h       | 10 ++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active_types.h |  2 +
 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Comments

Andrea Righi April 10, 2020, 10:44 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 02:21:12PM -0700, Sultan Alsawaf wrote:
> From: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>
> 
> Active and retire callbacks can run simultaneously, causing panics and
> mayhem. The most notable case is with the intel_context_pin/unpin race
> that causes ring and page table corruption. In 5.4, this race is more
> noticeable because intel_ring_unpin() sets ring->vaddr to NULL and
> causes a clean NULL-pointer-dereference panic, but in newer kernels this
> race goes unnoticed.
> 
> Here is an example of a crash caused by this race on 5.4:
> BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000003448
> RIP: 0010:gen8_emit_flush_render+0x163/0x190
> Call Trace:
>  execlists_request_alloc+0x25/0x40
>  __i915_request_create+0x1f4/0x2c0
>  i915_request_create+0x71/0xc0
>  i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0xb98/0x1a80
>  ? preempt_count_add+0x68/0xa0
>  ? _raw_spin_lock+0x13/0x30
>  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x16/0x30
>  i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x1de/0x3c0
>  ? i915_gem_busy_ioctl+0x7f/0x1d0
>  ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x2d0/0x2d0
>  drm_ioctl_kernel+0xb2/0x100
>  drm_ioctl+0x209/0x360
>  ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x2d0/0x2d0
>  ksys_ioctl+0x87/0xc0
>  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
>  do_syscall_64+0x4e/0x150
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> 
> Protect the active and retire callbacks with their own lock to prevent
> them from running at the same time as one another.
> 
> Fixes: 12c255b5dad1 ("drm/i915: Provide an i915_active.acquire callback")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan.alsawaf@canonical.com>

Applied to unstable/master-next, thanks.

-Andrea
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
index b0a499753526..5802233f71ec 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
@@ -147,8 +147,22 @@  __active_retire(struct i915_active *ref)
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ref->tree_lock, flags);
 
 	/* After the final retire, the entire struct may be freed */
-	if (ref->retire)
-		ref->retire(ref);
+	if (ref->retire) {
+		if (ref->active) {
+			bool freed = false;
+
+			/* Don't race with the active callback, and avoid UaF */
+			down_write(&ref->rwsem);
+			ref->freed = &freed;
+			ref->retire(ref);
+			if (!freed) {
+				ref->freed = NULL;
+				up_write(&ref->rwsem);
+			}
+		} else {
+			ref->retire(ref);
+		}
+	}
 
 	/* ... except if you wait on it, you must manage your own references! */
 	wake_up_var(ref);
@@ -278,7 +292,8 @@  void __i915_active_init(struct i915_active *ref,
 			int (*active)(struct i915_active *ref),
 			void (*retire)(struct i915_active *ref),
 			struct lock_class_key *mkey,
-			struct lock_class_key *wkey)
+			struct lock_class_key *wkey,
+			struct lock_class_key *rkey)
 {
 	unsigned long bits;
 
@@ -287,8 +302,13 @@  void __i915_active_init(struct i915_active *ref,
 	ref->flags = 0;
 	ref->active = active;
 	ref->retire = ptr_unpack_bits(retire, &bits, 2);
-	if (bits & I915_ACTIVE_MAY_SLEEP)
+	ref->freed = NULL;
+	if (ref->active && ref->retire) {
+		__init_rwsem(&ref->rwsem, "i915_active.rwsem", rkey);
 		ref->flags |= I915_ACTIVE_RETIRE_SLEEPS;
+	} else if (bits & I915_ACTIVE_MAY_SLEEP) {
+		ref->flags |= I915_ACTIVE_RETIRE_SLEEPS;
+	}
 
 	spin_lock_init(&ref->tree_lock);
 	ref->tree = RB_ROOT;
@@ -417,8 +437,20 @@  int i915_active_acquire(struct i915_active *ref)
 		return err;
 
 	if (likely(!i915_active_acquire_if_busy(ref))) {
-		if (ref->active)
-			err = ref->active(ref);
+		if (ref->active) {
+			if (ref->retire) {
+				/*
+				 * This can be a recursive call, and the mutex
+				 * above already protects from concurrent active
+				 * callbacks, so a read lock fits best.
+				 */
+				down_read(&ref->rwsem);
+				err = ref->active(ref);
+				up_read(&ref->rwsem);
+			} else {
+				err = ref->active(ref);
+			}
+		}
 		if (!err) {
 			spin_lock_irq(&ref->tree_lock); /* __active_retire() */
 			debug_active_activate(ref);
@@ -502,16 +534,20 @@  int i915_request_await_active(struct i915_request *rq, struct i915_active *ref)
 	return err;
 }
 
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM)
 void i915_active_fini(struct i915_active *ref)
 {
+	if (ref->freed) {
+		*ref->freed = true;
+		up_write(&ref->rwsem);
+	}
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM)
 	debug_active_fini(ref);
 	GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&ref->count));
 	GEM_BUG_ON(work_pending(&ref->work));
 	GEM_BUG_ON(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&ref->tree));
 	mutex_destroy(&ref->mutex);
-}
 #endif
+}
 
 static inline bool is_idle_barrier(struct active_node *node, u64 idx)
 {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h
index 51e1e854ca55..b684b1fdcc02 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h
@@ -153,14 +153,16 @@  void __i915_active_init(struct i915_active *ref,
 			int (*active)(struct i915_active *ref),
 			void (*retire)(struct i915_active *ref),
 			struct lock_class_key *mkey,
-			struct lock_class_key *wkey);
+			struct lock_class_key *wkey,
+			struct lock_class_key *rkey);
 
 /* Specialise each class of i915_active to avoid impossible lockdep cycles. */
 #define i915_active_init(ref, active, retire) do {		\
 	static struct lock_class_key __mkey;				\
 	static struct lock_class_key __wkey;				\
+	static struct lock_class_key __rkey;				\
 									\
-	__i915_active_init(ref, active, retire, &__mkey, &__wkey);	\
+	__i915_active_init(ref, active, retire, &__mkey, &__wkey, &__rkey);	\
 } while (0)
 
 int i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref,
@@ -200,11 +202,7 @@  i915_active_is_idle(const struct i915_active *ref)
 	return !atomic_read(&ref->count);
 }
 
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM)
 void i915_active_fini(struct i915_active *ref);
-#else
-static inline void i915_active_fini(struct i915_active *ref) { }
-#endif
 
 int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
 					    struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active_types.h
index 6360c3e4b765..aaee2548cb19 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active_types.h
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@  struct active_node;
 struct i915_active {
 	atomic_t count;
 	struct mutex mutex;
+	struct rw_semaphore rwsem;
+	bool *freed;
 
 	spinlock_t tree_lock;
 	struct active_node *cache;