@@ -2817,7 +2817,7 @@ lpfc_online(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
}
vports = lpfc_create_vport_work_array(phba);
- if (vports != NULL)
+ if (vports != NULL) {
for (i = 0; i <= phba->max_vports && vports[i] != NULL; i++) {
struct Scsi_Host *shost;
shost = lpfc_shost_from_vport(vports[i]);
@@ -2834,7 +2834,8 @@ lpfc_online(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
}
spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
}
- lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports);
+ }
+ lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports);
lpfc_unblock_mgmt_io(phba);
return 0;
This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled lpfc: fix misleading indentation to the linux-3.16.y-queue branch of the 3.16.y-ckt extended stable tree which can be found at: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/ubuntu/linux.git/log/?h=linux-3.16.y-queue This patch is scheduled to be released in version 3.16.7-ckt27. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please reply to this email. For more information about the 3.16.y-ckt tree, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable Thanks. -Luis ---8<------------------------------------------------------------ From 3096cd24855f48fe69363fb338037f0f87741567 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:29:44 +0100 Subject: lpfc: fix misleading indentation commit aeb6641f8ebdd61939f462a8255b316f9bfab707 upstream. gcc-6 complains about the indentation of the lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array() call in lpfc_online(), which clearly doesn't look right: drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c: In function 'lpfc_online': drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:2880:3: warning: statement is indented as if it were guarded by... [-Wmisleading-indentation] lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:2863:2: note: ...this 'if' clause, but it is not if (vports != NULL) ^~ Looking at the patch that introduced this code, it's clear that the behavior is correct and the indentation is wrong. This fixes the indentation and adds curly braces around the previous if() block for clarity, as that is most likely what caused the code to be misindented in the first place. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Fixes: 549e55cd2a1b ("[SCSI] lpfc 8.2.2 : Fix locking around HBA's port_list") Reviewed-by: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com> --- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)