From patchwork Fri Sep 4 13:08:02 2015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Luis Henriques X-Patchwork-Id: 514479 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from huckleberry.canonical.com (huckleberry.canonical.com [91.189.94.19]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C60814028F; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 23:12:12 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=huckleberry.canonical.com) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXqml-0005Ge-Ks; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 13:12:07 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXqkm-00044O-FQ for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 13:10:04 +0000 Received: from av-217-129-142-138.netvisao.pt ([217.129.142.138] helo=localhost) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXqkm-0006b5-AT; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 13:10:04 +0000 From: Luis Henriques To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 094/130] KVM: x86: Use adjustment in guest cycles when handling MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 14:08:02 +0100 Message-Id: <1441372118-5933-95-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4 In-Reply-To: <1441372118-5933-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> References: <1441372118-5933-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Extended-Stable: 3.16 Cc: Haozhong Zhang , Paolo Bonzini X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Sender: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com 3.16.7-ckt17 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Haozhong Zhang commit d7add05458084a5e3d65925764a02ca9c8202c1e upstream. When kvm_set_msr_common() handles a guest's write to MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST, it will calcuate an adjustment based on the data written by guest and then use it to adjust TSC offset by calling a call-back adjust_tsc_offset(). The 3rd parameter of adjust_tsc_offset() indicates whether the adjustment is in host TSC cycles or in guest TSC cycles. If SVM TSC scaling is enabled, adjust_tsc_offset() [i.e. svm_adjust_tsc_offset()] will first scale the adjustment; otherwise, it will just use the unscaled one. As the MSR write here comes from the guest, the adjustment is in guest TSC cycles. However, the current kvm_set_msr_common() uses it as a value in host TSC cycles (by using true as the 3rd parameter of adjust_tsc_offset()), which can result in an incorrect adjustment of TSC offset if SVM TSC scaling is enabled. This patch fixes this problem. Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques --- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index e05ef62906f4..27a8d4f9bce5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -2099,7 +2099,7 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info) if (guest_cpuid_has_tsc_adjust(vcpu)) { if (!msr_info->host_initiated) { u64 adj = data - vcpu->arch.ia32_tsc_adjust_msr; - kvm_x86_ops->adjust_tsc_offset(vcpu, adj, true); + adjust_tsc_offset_guest(vcpu, adj); } vcpu->arch.ia32_tsc_adjust_msr = data; }