| Message ID | 1436227889-26029-1-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c index 3f9e328..728f99b 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_init(void) if (producer_fifo >= 0) { struct sched_param param = { - .sched_priority = consumer_fifo + .sched_priority = producer_fifo }; sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, ¶m); } else
This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer to the linux-3.19.y-queue branch of the 3.19.y-ckt extended stable tree which can be found at: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/ubuntu/linux.git/log/?h=linux-3.19.y-queue This patch is scheduled to be released in version 3.19.8-ckt3. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please reply to this email. For more information about the 3.19.y-ckt tree, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable Thanks. -Kamal ------ From 38b6a0a73b6703e73abeb38572f4c4096040d66c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:12:37 +0000 Subject: ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer commit 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 upstream. The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority, so correct it. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433923957-67842-1-git-send-email-long.wanglong@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com> --- kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 1.9.1