diff mbox

[3.13.y-ckt,027/139] KVM: s390: flush CPU on load control

Message ID 1422483682-15393-28-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Kamal Mostafa Jan. 28, 2015, 10:19 p.m. UTC 
3.13.11-ckt15 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

commit 2dca485f8740208604543c3960be31a5dd3ea603 upstream.

some control register changes will flush some aspects of the CPU, e.g.
POP explicitely mentions that for CR9-CR11 "TLBs may be cleared".
Instead of trying to be clever and only flush on specific CRs, let
play safe and flush on all lctl(g) as future machines might define
new bits in CRs. Load control intercept should not happen that often.

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
index 2440602..8821ac8 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
@@ -688,7 +688,7 @@  int kvm_s390_handle_lctl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 			break;
 		reg = (reg + 1) % 16;
 	} while (1);
-
+	kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH, vcpu);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -725,7 +725,7 @@  static int handle_lctlg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 			break;
 		reg = (reg + 1) % 16;
 	} while (1);
-
+	kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH, vcpu);
 	return 0;
 }