From patchwork Tue Nov 25 10:37:40 2014 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Luis Henriques X-Patchwork-Id: 414576 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from huckleberry.canonical.com (huckleberry.canonical.com [91.189.94.19]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6D2140100; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 21:56:52 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=huckleberry.canonical.com) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XtDnd-0002Ff-4z; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:56:49 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XtDZ5-0002lN-BY for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:41:47 +0000 Received: from bl15-150-46.dsl.telepac.pt ([188.80.150.46] helo=localhost) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtDZ5-0001ux-6F; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:41:47 +0000 From: Luis Henriques To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 110/254] dm bufio: when done scanning return from __scan immediately Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:37:40 +0000 Message-Id: <1416912004-5928-111-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.0 In-Reply-To: <1416912004-5928-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> References: <1416912004-5928-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Extended-Stable: 3.16 Cc: Mikulas Patocka , Mike Snitzer X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Sender: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com 3.16.7-ckt2 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Mikulas Patocka commit 0e825862f3c04cee40e25f55680333728a4ffa9b upstream. When __scan frees the required number of buffer entries that the shrinker requested (nr_to_scan becomes zero) it must return. Before this fix the __scan code exited only the inner loop and continued in the outer loop -- which could result in reduced performance due to extra buffers being freed (e.g. unnecessarily evicted thinp metadata needing to be synchronously re-read into bufio's cache). Also, move dm_bufio_cond_resched to __scan's inner loop, so that iterating the bufio client's lru lists doesn't result in scheduling latency. Reported-by: Joe Thornber Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques --- drivers/md/dm-bufio.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c index da2ebac231b9..598ba99d2e15 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c @@ -1486,9 +1486,9 @@ static long __scan(struct dm_bufio_client *c, unsigned long nr_to_scan, list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(b, tmp, &c->lru[l], lru_list) { freed += __cleanup_old_buffer(b, gfp_mask, 0); if (!--nr_to_scan) - break; + return freed; + dm_bufio_cond_resched(); } - dm_bufio_cond_resched(); } return freed; }