From patchwork Thu Apr 24 08:49:54 2014 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Luis Henriques X-Patchwork-Id: 342230 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from huckleberry.canonical.com (huckleberry.canonical.com [91.189.94.19]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F36D14018C; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:55:43 +1000 (EST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=huckleberry.canonical.com) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WdFRT-0003nx-IV; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 08:55:39 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WdFPR-0002jG-SB for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 08:53:33 +0000 Received: from bl15-145-16.dsl.telepac.pt ([188.80.145.16] helo=localhost) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WdFPR-0004wR-IZ; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 08:53:33 +0000 From: Luis Henriques To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [PATCH 3.11 069/182] mfd: max8997: Fix possible NULL pointer dereference on i2c_new_dummy error Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:49:54 +0100 Message-Id: <1398329507-5911-70-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1398329507-5911-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> References: <1398329507-5911-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Extended-Stable: 3.11 Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Lee Jones X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Sender: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com 3.11.10.9 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Krzysztof Kozlowski commit 97dc4ed3fa377ec91bb60ba98b70d645c2099384 upstream. During probe the driver allocates dummy I2C devices for RTC, haptic and MUIC with i2c_new_dummy() but it does not check the return value of this calls. In case of error (i2c_new_device(): memory allocation failure or I2C address cannot be used) this function returns NULL which is later used by i2c_unregister_device(). If i2c_new_dummy() fails for RTC, haptic or MUIC devices, fail also the probe for main MFD driver. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Signed-off-by: Lee Jones Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques --- drivers/mfd/max8997.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/mfd/max8997.c b/drivers/mfd/max8997.c index 1471405..ea1defbc 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/max8997.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/max8997.c @@ -218,10 +218,26 @@ static int max8997_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c, mutex_init(&max8997->iolock); max8997->rtc = i2c_new_dummy(i2c->adapter, I2C_ADDR_RTC); + if (!max8997->rtc) { + dev_err(max8997->dev, "Failed to allocate I2C device for RTC\n"); + return -ENODEV; + } i2c_set_clientdata(max8997->rtc, max8997); + max8997->haptic = i2c_new_dummy(i2c->adapter, I2C_ADDR_HAPTIC); + if (!max8997->haptic) { + dev_err(max8997->dev, "Failed to allocate I2C device for Haptic\n"); + ret = -ENODEV; + goto err_i2c_haptic; + } i2c_set_clientdata(max8997->haptic, max8997); + max8997->muic = i2c_new_dummy(i2c->adapter, I2C_ADDR_MUIC); + if (!max8997->muic) { + dev_err(max8997->dev, "Failed to allocate I2C device for MUIC\n"); + ret = -ENODEV; + goto err_i2c_muic; + } i2c_set_clientdata(max8997->muic, max8997); pm_runtime_set_active(max8997->dev); @@ -248,7 +264,9 @@ static int max8997_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c, err_mfd: mfd_remove_devices(max8997->dev); i2c_unregister_device(max8997->muic); +err_i2c_muic: i2c_unregister_device(max8997->haptic); +err_i2c_haptic: i2c_unregister_device(max8997->rtc); err: kfree(max8997);