From patchwork Tue Jun 18 11:43:31 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Luis Henriques X-Patchwork-Id: 252315 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from huckleberry.canonical.com (huckleberry.canonical.com [91.189.94.19]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21AD12C02A1 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:48:59 +1000 (EST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=huckleberry.canonical.com) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UouP6-0004SC-EQ; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:48:52 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UouLi-0002So-J7 for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:45:22 +0000 Received: from bl16-85-234.dsl.telepac.pt ([188.81.85.234] helo=localhost) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UouLi-0008UD-5X; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:45:22 +0000 From: Luis Henriques To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [PATCH 83/93] md/raid1, raid10: use freeze_array in place of raise_barrier in various places. Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:43:31 +0100 Message-Id: <1371555821-12820-84-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.1.2 In-Reply-To: <1371555821-12820-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> References: <1371555821-12820-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Extended-Stable: 3.5 Cc: NeilBrown X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Sender: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com 3.5.7.15 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: NeilBrown commit e2d59925221cd562e07fee38ec8839f7209ae603 upstream. Various places in raid1 and raid10 are calling raise_barrier when they really should call freeze_array. The former is only intended to be called from "make_request". The later has extra checks for 'nr_queued' and makes a call to flush_pending_writes(), so it is safe to call it from within the management thread. Using raise_barrier will sometimes deadlock. Using freeze_array should not. As 'freeze_array' currently expects one request to be pending (in handle_read_error - the only previous caller), we need to pass it the number of pending requests (extra) to ignore. The deadlock was made particularly noticeable by commits 050b66152f87c7 (raid10) and 6b740b8d79252f13 (raid1) which appeared in 3.4, so the fix is appropriate for any -stable kernel since then. This patch probably won't apply directly to some early kernels and will need to be applied by hand. Reported-by: Alexander Lyakas Signed-off-by: NeilBrown [ luis: backported to 3.5: adjusted context ] Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques --- drivers/md/raid1.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- drivers/md/raid10.c | 14 +++++++------- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c index adba2e7..aa58c02 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c @@ -812,17 +812,17 @@ static void allow_barrier(struct r1conf *conf) wake_up(&conf->wait_barrier); } -static void freeze_array(struct r1conf *conf) +static void freeze_array(struct r1conf *conf, int extra) { /* stop syncio and normal IO and wait for everything to * go quite. * We increment barrier and nr_waiting, and then - * wait until nr_pending match nr_queued+1 + * wait until nr_pending match nr_queued+extra * This is called in the context of one normal IO request * that has failed. Thus any sync request that might be pending * will be blocked by nr_pending, and we need to wait for * pending IO requests to complete or be queued for re-try. - * Thus the number queued (nr_queued) plus this request (1) + * Thus the number queued (nr_queued) plus this request (extra) * must match the number of pending IOs (nr_pending) before * we continue. */ @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ static void freeze_array(struct r1conf *conf) conf->barrier++; conf->nr_waiting++; wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_barrier, - conf->nr_pending == conf->nr_queued+1, + conf->nr_pending == conf->nr_queued+extra, conf->resync_lock, flush_pending_writes(conf)); spin_unlock_irq(&conf->resync_lock); @@ -1429,8 +1429,8 @@ static int raid1_add_disk(struct mddev *mddev, struct md_rdev *rdev) * we wait for all outstanding requests to complete. */ synchronize_sched(); - raise_barrier(conf); - lower_barrier(conf); + freeze_array(conf, 0); + unfreeze_array(conf); clear_bit(Unmerged, &rdev->flags); } md_integrity_add_rdev(rdev, mddev); @@ -1478,11 +1478,11 @@ static int raid1_remove_disk(struct mddev *mddev, struct md_rdev *rdev) */ struct md_rdev *repl = conf->mirrors[conf->raid_disks + number].rdev; - raise_barrier(conf); + freeze_array(conf, 0); clear_bit(Replacement, &repl->flags); p->rdev = repl; conf->mirrors[conf->raid_disks + number].rdev = NULL; - lower_barrier(conf); + unfreeze_array(conf); clear_bit(WantReplacement, &rdev->flags); } else clear_bit(WantReplacement, &rdev->flags); @@ -2099,7 +2099,7 @@ static void handle_read_error(struct r1conf *conf, struct r1bio *r1_bio) * frozen */ if (mddev->ro == 0) { - freeze_array(conf); + freeze_array(conf, 1); fix_read_error(conf, r1_bio->read_disk, r1_bio->sector, r1_bio->sectors); unfreeze_array(conf); @@ -2862,7 +2862,7 @@ static int raid1_reshape(struct mddev *mddev) return -ENOMEM; } - raise_barrier(conf); + freeze_array(conf, 0); /* ok, everything is stopped */ oldpool = conf->r1bio_pool; @@ -2894,7 +2894,7 @@ static int raid1_reshape(struct mddev *mddev) mddev->delta_disks = 0; conf->last_used = 0; /* just make sure it is in-range */ - lower_barrier(conf); + unfreeze_array(conf); set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery); md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread); diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c index 9dd81d9..e76227e 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c @@ -995,17 +995,17 @@ static void allow_barrier(struct r10conf *conf) wake_up(&conf->wait_barrier); } -static void freeze_array(struct r10conf *conf) +static void freeze_array(struct r10conf *conf, int extra) { /* stop syncio and normal IO and wait for everything to * go quiet. * We increment barrier and nr_waiting, and then - * wait until nr_pending match nr_queued+1 + * wait until nr_pending match nr_queued+extra * This is called in the context of one normal IO request * that has failed. Thus any sync request that might be pending * will be blocked by nr_pending, and we need to wait for * pending IO requests to complete or be queued for re-try. - * Thus the number queued (nr_queued) plus this request (1) + * Thus the number queued (nr_queued) plus this request (extra) * must match the number of pending IOs (nr_pending) before * we continue. */ @@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ static void freeze_array(struct r10conf *conf) conf->barrier++; conf->nr_waiting++; wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_barrier, - conf->nr_pending == conf->nr_queued+1, + conf->nr_pending == conf->nr_queued+extra, conf->resync_lock, flush_pending_writes(conf)); @@ -1715,8 +1715,8 @@ static int raid10_add_disk(struct mddev *mddev, struct md_rdev *rdev) * we wait for all outstanding requests to complete. */ synchronize_sched(); - raise_barrier(conf, 0); - lower_barrier(conf); + freeze_array(conf, 0); + unfreeze_array(conf); clear_bit(Unmerged, &rdev->flags); } md_integrity_add_rdev(rdev, mddev); @@ -2509,7 +2509,7 @@ static void handle_read_error(struct mddev *mddev, struct r10bio *r10_bio) r10_bio->devs[slot].bio = NULL; if (mddev->ro == 0) { - freeze_array(conf); + freeze_array(conf, 1); fix_read_error(conf, mddev, r10_bio); unfreeze_array(conf); } else