| Message ID | 20190411215058.9640-1-dann.frazier@canonical.com |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Fix Built-Using package name | expand |
On 11.04.19 23:50, dann frazier wrote: > BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824016 > > The Built-Using field hardcodes "linux" as the source package, even for the > hwe & hwe-edge packages. Correct that. Technically only the > linux-signed-hwe{-edge} packages need this fix, but I'm including patches > for linux-signed as well to prevent future occurences due to cargo-culting. > > Verified by confirming that the same control file is generated before > and after this change (it is to linux-signed, where the hardcoded package > name happens to be correct). > > fyi, I've got another branch with a lot more cleanup, but I'll just sit on > that until the next devel release, unless there's already a tree to target > there (unstable?). > > v2: > * Clarify the vague PACKAGE, VERSION template vars by prefixing > them with "UNSIGNED_SRC_". > * Restrict to linux-signed/disco until the approach is agreed. > > dann frazier (2): > UBUNTU: Rename "VERSION" template string to more precise > "UNSIGNED_SRC_VERSION" > UBUNTU: Use the correct source package name in Built-Using field > > debian/control.stub | 8 ++++---- > debian/rules | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > Acked-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
On 2019-04-11 15:50:56 , dann frazier wrote: > BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824016 > > The Built-Using field hardcodes "linux" as the source package, even for the > hwe & hwe-edge packages. Correct that. Technically only the > linux-signed-hwe{-edge} packages need this fix, but I'm including patches > for linux-signed as well to prevent future occurences due to cargo-culting. > > Verified by confirming that the same control file is generated before > and after this change (it is to linux-signed, where the hardcoded package > name happens to be correct). > > fyi, I've got another branch with a lot more cleanup, but I'll just sit on > that until the next devel release, unless there's already a tree to target > there (unstable?). > > v2: > * Clarify the vague PACKAGE, VERSION template vars by prefixing > them with "UNSIGNED_SRC_". > * Restrict to linux-signed/disco until the approach is agreed. > > dann frazier (2): > UBUNTU: Rename "VERSION" template string to more precise > "UNSIGNED_SRC_VERSION" > UBUNTU: Use the correct source package name in Built-Using field > > debian/control.stub | 8 ++++---- > debian/rules | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.20.1 > > > -- > kernel-team mailing list > kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team
On 2019-04-11 15:50:56 , dann frazier wrote: > BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824016 > > The Built-Using field hardcodes "linux" as the source package, even for the > hwe & hwe-edge packages. Correct that. Technically only the > linux-signed-hwe{-edge} packages need this fix, but I'm including patches > for linux-signed as well to prevent future occurences due to cargo-culting. > > Verified by confirming that the same control file is generated before > and after this change (it is to linux-signed, where the hardcoded package > name happens to be correct). > > fyi, I've got another branch with a lot more cleanup, but I'll just sit on > that until the next devel release, unless there's already a tree to target > there (unstable?). > > v2: > * Clarify the vague PACKAGE, VERSION template vars by prefixing > them with "UNSIGNED_SRC_". > * Restrict to linux-signed/disco until the approach is agreed. > > dann frazier (2): > UBUNTU: Rename "VERSION" template string to more precise > "UNSIGNED_SRC_VERSION" > UBUNTU: Use the correct source package name in Built-Using field > > debian/control.stub | 8 ++++---- > debian/rules | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.20.1 > > > -- > kernel-team mailing list > kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824016 The Built-Using field hardcodes "linux" as the source package, even for the hwe & hwe-edge packages. Correct that. Technically only the linux-signed-hwe{-edge} packages need this fix, but I'm including patches for linux-signed as well to prevent future occurences due to cargo-culting. Verified by confirming that the same control file is generated before and after this change (it is to linux-signed, where the hardcoded package name happens to be correct). fyi, I've got another branch with a lot more cleanup, but I'll just sit on that until the next devel release, unless there's already a tree to target there (unstable?). v2: * Clarify the vague PACKAGE, VERSION template vars by prefixing them with "UNSIGNED_SRC_". * Restrict to linux-signed/disco until the approach is agreed. dann frazier (2): UBUNTU: Rename "VERSION" template string to more precise "UNSIGNED_SRC_VERSION" UBUNTU: Use the correct source package name in Built-Using field debian/control.stub | 8 ++++---- debian/rules | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)