From patchwork Thu Aug 21 16:41:26 2014 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Fabio Estevam X-Patchwork-Id: 382000 X-Patchwork-Delegate: sbabic@denx.de Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from theia.denx.de (theia.denx.de [85.214.87.163]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B991F14008F for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 02:41:37 +1000 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by theia.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE254A74D5; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:41:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at theia.denx.de Received: from theia.denx.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (theia.denx.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rPcXg-loZ0C9; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:41:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from theia.denx.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by theia.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD02A74E0; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:41:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by theia.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818D4A74E0 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:41:32 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at theia.denx.de Received: from theia.denx.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (theia.denx.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KP+u4aCLcNWI for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:41:30 +0200 (CEST) X-policyd-weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_SPAMCOP=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 (only DNSBL check requested) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by theia.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C646A74D5 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:41:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id z11so8171895lbi.41 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:41:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=NiKLTNxmUmgXykPENodhVAG0X9J1ThjjRHDkvIElQpc=; b=NDqRqIFlMtKOJclvHr5Xd5VQhevLihUcreRMWH14Md6r+aXMYuTjLf7Km6kKZcuhWU nVDC44TlXCk94280ZP5ocS3oOwi+9wAnXVOF2PZgBMrl0VVdCjrP6lBF1ac30/4v4jBb tqkjb+ckhn2j8Jj6XVC+2u0FOafPet+9nGCEdlLTPJiVE7ySuq6JHodsq7ROiIQf7Fsj uTv8VLVA+UCq6w1S6qANSd+PzZ9ZXElpa4NlZXyD5DB41kSa88f5ak4nBA4qVY/CfN9j iVolvWUMxaRZHrKCsOa+nSdee1jbPUViThovJUos2iuZusgnnuq8u5Ba1oaMs+aRhf7a chCQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.37.100 with SMTP id x4mr49429270laj.58.1408639286808; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:41:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.26.8 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:41:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201408211821.33065.marex@denx.de> References: <1408637529-31170-1-git-send-email-fabio.estevam@freescale.com> <201408211821.33065.marex@denx.de> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 13:41:26 -0300 Message-ID: From: Fabio Estevam To: Marek Vasut Cc: Fabio Estevam , U-Boot-Denx , Stefan Roese , Otavio Salvador Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/2] net: fec_mxc: Adjust RX DMA alignment for mx6solox X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Isn't MX6SX ARMv7 with 64-byte cacheline alignment anyway ? So isn't there > something completely else broken on MX6SX ? Thanks for the review, Marek. Inspecting this further I think the correct fix would be: arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h index 2631beb..e9e6f63 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ #define ARCH_MXC -#define CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE 32 +#define CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE 64 Do you agree? _______________________________________________