| Message ID | CAEUhbmUiGB2AzXNyC-npsUZ9GJqkQN0o-fpmZEDc-hRwFC4ZrQ@mail.gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Delegated to: | Tom Rini |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-x86 | expand |
Hello Bing, Edison?! Edison is dead (end), as I know it... The project is cancelled. Correct me if I am wrong! Much more important INTEL U-Boot businesses are ATOM E3900/APL-I family and CORE-5 BDW-DE (possible also BDW-DE NS), What about these? Thank you, Zoran Stojsavljevic
Hi Zoran, On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Zoran Stojsavljevic <zoran.stojsavljevic@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Bing, > > Edison?! Edison is dead (end), as I know it... The project is cancelled. > Correct me if I am wrong! > I don't know that story. Loop Andy in to comment. But my understanding is that these are pretty much Intel Tangier SoC related, and Edison is just a reference board. > Much more important INTEL U-Boot businesses are ATOM E3900/APL-I family and > CORE-5 BDW-DE (possible also BDW-DE NS), > > What about these? > As I mentioned before, these are on my todo list. If you or anyone else would like to contribute, patches are always welcome! Regards, Bin
On Sat, 2017-10-07 at 16:32 +0800, Bin Meng wrote: +Cc: Ferry (he might be interested in this thread) > > Edison?! Edison is dead (end), as I know it... Some people don't think so, there are ones who like the board. Actually, while working for Linux kernel at Intel I'm using that board on almost daily basis to do many tests which are not related strictly to Edison or even Tangier. > > The project is cancelled. That's correct [1]. But be honest, don't you like the idea to have an example of the board, which was never designed to be ACPI compatible, actually to become one (as much as hardware and ACPI specification allow to, of course)? Besides that I have started looking into Edison's stuff around spring time of 2015. You may see my progress here [2] (first article dated 27.03.2015, the chapter "6 What is working and what doesn't" shows progress of upstreaming). U-Boot was appeared on my radar when the stock one stopped working with vanilla kernels. > > Correct me if I am wrong! See above. > I don't know that story. Loop Andy in to comment. Thanks, Bin, for including me in the loop. > But my understanding > is that these are pretty much Intel Tangier SoC related, ...and Merrifield as a platform, which had been used in some x86-based phones. > and Edison is > just a reference board. Edison is one of the Intel's IoT boards, but the only board from Intel MID family [3]. > > Much more important INTEL U-Boot businesses are ATOM E3900/APL-I > > family and > > CORE-5 BDW-DE (possible also BDW-DE NS), > > > > What about these? I can't answer on this. Work on Edison stuff may be considered as my hobby project (I have never been a part of an official team which had done Edison). [1]: https://communities.intel.com/docs/DOC-112093 [2]: https://edison.internet-share.com/wiki/Using_a_vanilla_Linux_kernel _with_Intel_Edison [3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_Internet_device#Intel_MID_plat forms
On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 03:16:26PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote: > Hi Tom, > > The following changes since commit 3ea0520512089cffbe02b7d6eb645cdfddb09c5c: > > disk: part_dos: Use the original allocation scheme for the SPL case > (2017-10-05 10:45:33 -0400) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.denx.de/u-boot-x86.git > > for you to fetch changes up to 256df1e1c6664e94926affe9318faa8258c18582: > > x86: edison: Bring minimal ACPI support to the board (2017-10-07 > 15:07:59 +0800) > Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
Hi Tom, The following changes since commit 3ea0520512089cffbe02b7d6eb645cdfddb09c5c: disk: part_dos: Use the original allocation scheme for the SPL case (2017-10-05 10:45:33 -0400) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-x86.git for you to fetch changes up to 256df1e1c6664e94926affe9318faa8258c18582: x86: edison: Bring minimal ACPI support to the board (2017-10-07 15:07:59 +0800) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Andy Shevchenko (2): x86: tangier: Enable ACPI support for Intel Tangier x86: edison: Bring minimal ACPI support to the board Stefan Roese (3): x86: theadorable-x86-common: Add further pci hotplug cmdline parameters x86: theadorable-x86-common: Move "-generic" into kernel-ver variable x86: theadorable-x86-xxx_defconfig: Enable setexpr command arch/x86/cpu/tangier/Makefile | 1 + arch/x86/cpu/tangier/acpi.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/include/asm/arch-tangier/acpi/global_nvs.asl | 16 ++++++ arch/x86/include/asm/arch-tangier/acpi/platform.asl | 31 +++++++++++ arch/x86/include/asm/arch-tangier/acpi/southcluster.asl | 298 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/include/asm/arch-tangier/global_nvs.h | 22 ++++++++ board/intel/edison/.gitignore | 3 ++ board/intel/edison/Kconfig | 6 +++ board/intel/edison/Makefile | 1 + board/intel/edison/dsdt.asl | 13 +++++ configs/theadorable-x86-conga-qa3-e3845-pcie-x4_defconfig | 1 - configs/theadorable-x86-conga-qa3-e3845_defconfig | 1 - configs/theadorable-x86-dfi-bt700_defconfig | 1 - include/configs/edison.h | 3 ++ include/configs/theadorable-x86-common.h | 11 ++-- 15 files changed, 487 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/x86/cpu/tangier/acpi.c create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/arch-tangier/acpi/global_nvs.asl create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/arch-tangier/acpi/platform.asl create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/arch-tangier/acpi/southcluster.asl create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/arch-tangier/global_nvs.h create mode 100644 board/intel/edison/.gitignore create mode 100644 board/intel/edison/dsdt.asl Regards, Bin