diff mbox series

[v2] image-board: fix wrong implementation ram disk address setup from cmdline

Message ID 20211125030859.2896352-1-art@khadas.com
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: Tom Rini
Headers show
Series [v2] image-board: fix wrong implementation ram disk address setup from cmdline | expand

Commit Message

Art Nikpal Nov. 25, 2021, 3:08 a.m. UTC
Problem

Wrong implementation logic: ramdisk cmdline image address always ignored!
Next block { rd_addr = hextoul(select, NULL) } unusable for raw initrd.

We have unbootable raw initrd images because, select_ramdisk for raw
initrd images ignore submited select addr and setup rd_datap value to 0

Signed-off-by: Artem Lapkin <art@khadas.com>
---
V2 changes
_ rebase to master
_ from https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20211016051915.4157293-1-art@khadas.com/
---
 boot/image-board.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Simon Glass Dec. 7, 2021, 3:07 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 20:09, Artem Lapkin <email2tema@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Problem
>
> Wrong implementation logic: ramdisk cmdline image address always ignored!
> Next block { rd_addr = hextoul(select, NULL) } unusable for raw initrd.
>
> We have unbootable raw initrd images because, select_ramdisk for raw
> initrd images ignore submited select addr and setup rd_datap value to 0
>
> Signed-off-by: Artem Lapkin <art@khadas.com>
> ---
> V2 changes
> _ rebase to master
> _ from https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20211016051915.4157293-1-art@khadas.com/
> ---
>  boot/image-board.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Fixes: f33a2c1bd0f ("image: Remove #ifdefs from select_ramdisk()")
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tom Rini Jan. 17, 2022, 7:47 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:08:59AM +0800, Artem Lapkin wrote:

> Problem
> 
> Wrong implementation logic: ramdisk cmdline image address always ignored!
> Next block { rd_addr = hextoul(select, NULL) } unusable for raw initrd.
> 
> We have unbootable raw initrd images because, select_ramdisk for raw
> initrd images ignore submited select addr and setup rd_datap value to 0
> 
> Signed-off-by: Artem Lapkin <art@khadas.com>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> ---
> V2 changes
> _ rebase to master
> _ from https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20211016051915.4157293-1-art@khadas.com/
> ---
>  boot/image-board.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/boot/image-board.c b/boot/image-board.c
> index bf8817165c..87a8f07432 100644
> --- a/boot/image-board.c
> +++ b/boot/image-board.c
> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int select_ramdisk(bootm_headers_t *images, const char *select, u8 arch,
>  
>  	if (select) {
>  		ulong default_addr;
> -		bool done = true;
> +		bool done = false;
>  
>  		if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(FIT)) {
>  			/*
> @@ -352,13 +352,13 @@ static int select_ramdisk(bootm_headers_t *images, const char *select, u8 arch,
>  					   &fit_uname_config)) {
>  				debug("*  ramdisk: config '%s' from image at 0x%08lx\n",
>  				      fit_uname_config, rd_addr);
> +				done = true;
>  			} else if (fit_parse_subimage(select, default_addr,
>  						      &rd_addr,
>  						      &fit_uname_ramdisk)) {
>  				debug("*  ramdisk: subimage '%s' from image at 0x%08lx\n",
>  				      fit_uname_ramdisk, rd_addr);
> -			} else {
> -				done = false;
> +				done = true;
>  			}
>  		}
>  		if (!done) {

I think we still need this?  Can you please confirm and if so rebase to
master again, sorry, thanks!
Art Nikpal Jan. 18, 2022, 7:28 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 3:47 AM Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:08:59AM +0800, Artem Lapkin wrote:
>
> > Problem
> >
> > Wrong implementation logic: ramdisk cmdline image address always ignored!
> > Next block { rd_addr = hextoul(select, NULL) } unusable for raw initrd.
> >
> > We have unbootable raw initrd images because, select_ramdisk for raw
> > initrd images ignore submited select addr and setup rd_datap value to 0
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Artem Lapkin <art@khadas.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > V2 changes
> > _ rebase to master
> > _ from https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20211016051915.4157293-1-art@khadas.com/
> > ---
> >  boot/image-board.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/boot/image-board.c b/boot/image-board.c
> > index bf8817165c..87a8f07432 100644
> > --- a/boot/image-board.c
> > +++ b/boot/image-board.c
> > @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int select_ramdisk(bootm_headers_t *images, const char *select, u8 arch,
> >
> >       if (select) {
> >               ulong default_addr;
> > -             bool done = true;
> > +             bool done = false;
> >
> >               if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(FIT)) {
> >                       /*
> > @@ -352,13 +352,13 @@ static int select_ramdisk(bootm_headers_t *images, const char *select, u8 arch,
> >                                          &fit_uname_config)) {
> >                               debug("*  ramdisk: config '%s' from image at 0x%08lx\n",
> >                                     fit_uname_config, rd_addr);
> > +                             done = true;
> >                       } else if (fit_parse_subimage(select, default_addr,
> >                                                     &rd_addr,
> >                                                     &fit_uname_ramdisk)) {
> >                               debug("*  ramdisk: subimage '%s' from image at 0x%08lx\n",
> >                                     fit_uname_ramdisk, rd_addr);
> > -                     } else {
> > -                             done = false;
> > +                             done = true;
> >                       }
> >               }
> >               if (!done) {
>
> I think we still need this?  Can you please confirm and if so rebase to
> master again, sorry, thanks!

i need to check master and test it again - i'll replay soon tnx

>
> --
> Tom
Art Nikpal Jan. 23, 2022, 3:32 a.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 3:47 AM Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:08:59AM +0800, Artem Lapkin wrote:
>
> > Problem
> >
> > Wrong implementation logic: ramdisk cmdline image address always ignored!
> > Next block { rd_addr = hextoul(select, NULL) } unusable for raw initrd.
> >
> > We have unbootable raw initrd images because, select_ramdisk for raw
> > initrd images ignore submited select addr and setup rd_datap value to 0
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Artem Lapkin <art@khadas.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > V2 changes
> > _ rebase to master
> > _ from https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20211016051915.4157293-1-art@khadas.com/
> > ---
> >  boot/image-board.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/boot/image-board.c b/boot/image-board.c
> > index bf8817165c..87a8f07432 100644
> > --- a/boot/image-board.c
> > +++ b/boot/image-board.c
> > @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int select_ramdisk(bootm_headers_t *images, const char *select, u8 arch,
> >
> >       if (select) {
> >               ulong default_addr;
> > -             bool done = true;
> > +             bool done = false;
> >
> >               if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(FIT)) {
> >                       /*
> > @@ -352,13 +352,13 @@ static int select_ramdisk(bootm_headers_t *images, const char *select, u8 arch,
> >                                          &fit_uname_config)) {
> >                               debug("*  ramdisk: config '%s' from image at 0x%08lx\n",
> >                                     fit_uname_config, rd_addr);
> > +                             done = true;
> >                       } else if (fit_parse_subimage(select, default_addr,
> >                                                     &rd_addr,
> >                                                     &fit_uname_ramdisk)) {
> >                               debug("*  ramdisk: subimage '%s' from image at 0x%08lx\n",
> >                                     fit_uname_ramdisk, rd_addr);
> > -                     } else {
> > -                             done = false;
> > +                             done = true;
> >                       }
> >               }
> >               if (!done) {
>
> I think we still need this?  Can you please confirm and if so rebase to
> master again, sorry, thanks!

i have check master which have new commit
621158d106fe53fbb2d786d9d19dff44ad1baf91

no need for this state !!

Author: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Date:   Mon Dec 20 09:36:32 2021 -0500

    Revert "image: Remove #ifdefs from select_ramdisk()"

    This reverts commit f33a2c1bd0fb371511a485cac1f182ba50db51be.

    This causes a crash on some platforms as seen here:
    https://lore.kernel.org/r/f153017b-c41a-0d32-67b9-f288e695f900@baylibre.com/

    Reported-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
    Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

PS: about crash problem maybe its same reason may be need try apply my
patch and no need reverts commit
f33a2c1bd0fb371511a485cac1f182ba50db51be.
>
> --
> Tom
Neil Armstrong Jan. 24, 2022, 9:26 a.m. UTC | #5
Hi,

On 23/01/2022 04:32, Art Nikpal wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 3:47 AM Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:08:59AM +0800, Artem Lapkin wrote:
>>
>>> Problem
>>>
>>> Wrong implementation logic: ramdisk cmdline image address always ignored!
>>> Next block { rd_addr = hextoul(select, NULL) } unusable for raw initrd.
>>>
>>> We have unbootable raw initrd images because, select_ramdisk for raw
>>> initrd images ignore submited select addr and setup rd_datap value to 0
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Artem Lapkin <art@khadas.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
>>> ---
>>> V2 changes
>>> _ rebase to master
>>> _ from https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20211016051915.4157293-1-art@khadas.com/
>>> ---
>>>  boot/image-board.c | 6 +++---
>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/boot/image-board.c b/boot/image-board.c
>>> index bf8817165c..87a8f07432 100644
>>> --- a/boot/image-board.c
>>> +++ b/boot/image-board.c
>>> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int select_ramdisk(bootm_headers_t *images, const char *select, u8 arch,
>>>
>>>       if (select) {
>>>               ulong default_addr;
>>> -             bool done = true;
>>> +             bool done = false;
>>>
>>>               if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(FIT)) {
>>>                       /*
>>> @@ -352,13 +352,13 @@ static int select_ramdisk(bootm_headers_t *images, const char *select, u8 arch,
>>>                                          &fit_uname_config)) {
>>>                               debug("*  ramdisk: config '%s' from image at 0x%08lx\n",
>>>                                     fit_uname_config, rd_addr);
>>> +                             done = true;
>>>                       } else if (fit_parse_subimage(select, default_addr,
>>>                                                     &rd_addr,
>>>                                                     &fit_uname_ramdisk)) {
>>>                               debug("*  ramdisk: subimage '%s' from image at 0x%08lx\n",
>>>                                     fit_uname_ramdisk, rd_addr);
>>> -                     } else {
>>> -                             done = false;
>>> +                             done = true;
>>>                       }
>>>               }
>>>               if (!done) {
>>
>> I think we still need this?  Can you please confirm and if so rebase to
>> master again, sorry, thanks!
> 
> i have check master which have new commit
> 621158d106fe53fbb2d786d9d19dff44ad1baf91
> 
> no need for this state !!
> 
> Author: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
> Date:   Mon Dec 20 09:36:32 2021 -0500
> 
>     Revert "image: Remove #ifdefs from select_ramdisk()"
> 
>     This reverts commit f33a2c1bd0fb371511a485cac1f182ba50db51be.
> 
>     This causes a crash on some platforms as seen here:
>     https://lore.kernel.org/r/f153017b-c41a-0d32-67b9-f288e695f900@baylibre.com/
> 
>     Reported-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
> 
> PS: about crash problem maybe its same reason may be need try apply my
> patch and no need reverts commit
> f33a2c1bd0fb371511a485cac1f182ba50db51be.

Indeed, I missed this fix completely... anyway having a functional release was the most important at that time.

Re-sending "image: Remove #ifdefs from select_ramdisk()" with this fix squashed would be the time now.

Neil

>>
>> --
>> Tom
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/boot/image-board.c b/boot/image-board.c
index bf8817165c..87a8f07432 100644
--- a/boot/image-board.c
+++ b/boot/image-board.c
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@  static int select_ramdisk(bootm_headers_t *images, const char *select, u8 arch,
 
 	if (select) {
 		ulong default_addr;
-		bool done = true;
+		bool done = false;
 
 		if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(FIT)) {
 			/*
@@ -352,13 +352,13 @@  static int select_ramdisk(bootm_headers_t *images, const char *select, u8 arch,
 					   &fit_uname_config)) {
 				debug("*  ramdisk: config '%s' from image at 0x%08lx\n",
 				      fit_uname_config, rd_addr);
+				done = true;
 			} else if (fit_parse_subimage(select, default_addr,
 						      &rd_addr,
 						      &fit_uname_ramdisk)) {
 				debug("*  ramdisk: subimage '%s' from image at 0x%08lx\n",
 				      fit_uname_ramdisk, rd_addr);
-			} else {
-				done = false;
+				done = true;
 			}
 		}
 		if (!done) {