From patchwork Thu Mar 8 15:40:04 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Miquel Raynal X-Patchwork-Id: 883185 X-Patchwork-Delegate: sjg@chromium.org Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=lists.denx.de (client-ip=81.169.180.215; helo=lists.denx.de; envelope-from=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Received: from lists.denx.de (dione.denx.de [81.169.180.215]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3zxvsY0s9sz9shF for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 02:42:41 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by lists.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 105) id CA0F3C21E5B; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:41:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lists.denx.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from lists.denx.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5823BC21F0F; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lists.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 105) id EB7B9C21C2C; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:40:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.bootlin.com (mail.bootlin.com [62.4.15.54]) by lists.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10DB9C21E5B for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:40:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 5F954207DA; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 16:40:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.localdomain (LStLambert-657-1-97-87.w90-63.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.63.216.87]) by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 26D4620721; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 16:40:27 +0100 (CET) From: Miquel Raynal To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 16:40:04 +0100 Message-Id: <20180308154021.25255-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.1 In-Reply-To: <20180308154021.25255-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> References: <20180308154021.25255-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/18] tpm: add Revision ID field in the chip structure X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" TPM are shipped with a few read-only register from which we can retrieve for instance: - vendor ID - product ID - revision ID Product and vendor ID share the same register and are already referenced in the tpm_chip structure. Add the revision ID entry which is missing. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal --- drivers/tpm/tpm_tis.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/tpm/tpm_tis.h b/drivers/tpm/tpm_tis.h index 25b152b321..2b81f3be50 100644 --- a/drivers/tpm/tpm_tis.h +++ b/drivers/tpm/tpm_tis.h @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct tpm_chip { int is_open; int locality; u32 vend_dev; + u8 rid; unsigned long timeout_a, timeout_b, timeout_c, timeout_d; /* msec */ ulong chip_type; };