diff mbox

[U-Boot] dm: core: Correct bug introduced in uclass_first/next_device()

Message ID 1429936388-1350-1-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org
State Accepted
Delegated to: Simon Glass
Headers show

Commit Message

Simon Glass April 25, 2015, 4:33 a.m. UTC
These functions now rely on uclass_find_first/next_device() and assume that
they will either return failure (-ve error code) or a device. In fact,
coming to the end of a list is not considered failure and they return 0
in that case.

The logic to deal with this was replaced in commit acb9ca2a with just using
uclass_get_device_tail(). Add back the missing logic. This bug was
caught by unit tests but since they were broken for other reasons at the
time, this was not noticed.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
---

 drivers/core/uclass.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

Comments

Simon Glass April 28, 2015, 12:42 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

On 24 April 2015 at 22:33, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:
> These functions now rely on uclass_find_first/next_device() and assume that
> they will either return failure (-ve error code) or a device. In fact,
> coming to the end of a list is not considered failure and they return 0
> in that case.
>
> The logic to deal with this was replaced in commit acb9ca2a with just using
> uclass_get_device_tail(). Add back the missing logic. This bug was
> caught by unit tests but since they were broken for other reasons at the
> time, this was not noticed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> ---
>
>  drivers/core/uclass.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

Applied to u-boot-dm.

I'll pull this in soon since it does break a number of things.

Regards,
Simon
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/core/uclass.c b/drivers/core/uclass.c
index 04e939d..7de8173 100644
--- a/drivers/core/uclass.c
+++ b/drivers/core/uclass.c
@@ -277,6 +277,7 @@  int uclass_get_device_tail(struct udevice *dev, int ret,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	assert(dev);
 	ret = device_probe(dev);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -342,6 +343,8 @@  int uclass_first_device(enum uclass_id id, struct udevice **devp)
 
 	*devp = NULL;
 	ret = uclass_find_first_device(id, &dev);
+	if (!dev)
+		return 0;
 	return uclass_get_device_tail(dev, ret, devp);
 }
 
@@ -352,6 +355,8 @@  int uclass_next_device(struct udevice **devp)
 
 	*devp = NULL;
 	ret = uclass_find_next_device(&dev);
+	if (!dev)
+		return 0;
 	return uclass_get_device_tail(dev, ret, devp);
 }