diff mbox

[U-Boot] nand_spl: nand_boot.c: Remove CONFIG_SYS_NAND_READ_DELAY

Message ID 1304502254-32719-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de
State Accepted
Headers show

Commit Message

Stefan Roese May 4, 2011, 9:44 a.m. UTC
There are multiple reasons why this define should be removed:

First it saves some space and therefore fixes a problem we have on
the canyonlands_nand and glacier_nand targets right now.

Second, the define was hackish and would most likely not work on all
board using nand_boot.c. Boards not providing a real dev_ready()
function should implement a board specific function instead.

I checked and it seems, that all boards using nand_boot.c right now
already implement a board specific dev_ready() function. So this
patch should not break any boards and will result in smaller
NAND_SPL images.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
Cc: Sughosh Ganu <urwithsughosh@gmail.com>
Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com>
---
 nand_spl/nand_boot.c |   24 ++++++------------------
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Comments

Sughosh Ganu May 5, 2011, 8:43 a.m. UTC | #1
hi Stefan,
On Wed May 04, 2011 at 11:44:14AM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> There are multiple reasons why this define should be removed:
> 
> First it saves some space and therefore fixes a problem we have on
> the canyonlands_nand and glacier_nand targets right now.
> 
> Second, the define was hackish and would most likely not work on all
> board using nand_boot.c. Boards not providing a real dev_ready()
> function should implement a board specific function instead.
> 
> I checked and it seems, that all boards using nand_boot.c right now
> already implement a board specific dev_ready() function. So this
> patch should not break any boards and will result in smaller
> NAND_SPL images.

Tested on hawkboard, nand_spl and u-boot images boots fine.

Tested-by: Sughosh Ganu <urwithsughosh@gmail.com>

-sughosh
Scott Wood May 13, 2011, 4:16 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:44:14AM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> There are multiple reasons why this define should be removed:
> 
> First it saves some space and therefore fixes a problem we have on
> the canyonlands_nand and glacier_nand targets right now.
> 
> Second, the define was hackish and would most likely not work on all
> board using nand_boot.c. Boards not providing a real dev_ready()
> function should implement a board specific function instead.
> 
> I checked and it seems, that all boards using nand_boot.c right now
> already implement a board specific dev_ready() function. So this
> patch should not break any boards and will result in smaller
> NAND_SPL images.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
> Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
> Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
> Cc: Sughosh Ganu <urwithsughosh@gmail.com>
> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com>
> ---
>  nand_spl/nand_boot.c |   24 ++++++------------------
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Applied to u-boot-nand-flash

-Scott
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/nand_spl/nand_boot.c b/nand_spl/nand_boot.c
index 4a96878..cefeb91 100644
--- a/nand_spl/nand_boot.c
+++ b/nand_spl/nand_boot.c
@@ -22,9 +22,6 @@ 
 #include <nand.h>
 #include <asm/io.h>
 
-#define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_READ_DELAY \
-	{ volatile int dummy; int i; for (i=0; i<10000; i++) dummy = i; }
-
 static int nand_ecc_pos[] = CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ECCPOS;
 
 #if (CONFIG_SYS_NAND_PAGE_SIZE <= 512)
@@ -61,11 +58,8 @@  static int nand_command(struct mtd_info *mtd, int block, int page, int offs, u8
 	/*
 	 * Wait a while for the data to be ready
 	 */
-	if (this->dev_ready)
-		while (!this->dev_ready(mtd))
-			;
-	else
-		CONFIG_SYS_NAND_READ_DELAY;
+	while (!this->dev_ready(mtd))
+		;
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -78,11 +72,8 @@  static int nand_command(struct mtd_info *mtd, int block, int page, int offs, u8
 	struct nand_chip *this = mtd->priv;
 	int page_addr = page + block * CONFIG_SYS_NAND_PAGE_COUNT;
 
-	if (this->dev_ready)
-		while (!this->dev_ready(mtd))
-			;
-	else
-		CONFIG_SYS_NAND_READ_DELAY;
+	while (!this->dev_ready(mtd))
+		;
 
 	/* Emulate NAND_CMD_READOOB */
 	if (cmd == NAND_CMD_READOOB) {
@@ -118,11 +109,8 @@  static int nand_command(struct mtd_info *mtd, int block, int page, int offs, u8
 	/*
 	 * Wait a while for the data to be ready
 	 */
-	if (this->dev_ready)
-		while (!this->dev_ready(mtd))
-			;
-	else
-		CONFIG_SYS_NAND_READ_DELAY;
+	while (!this->dev_ready(mtd))
+		;
 
 	return 0;
 }