| Message ID | 20210402114744.235595-1-sbabic@denx.de |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
| Series | README: drop erroneous statement about license | expand |
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 1:47 PM Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> wrote: > > README says that license is GPLv2 but after a couple of sentences is > reported as default GPL 2.0+, that it is not consistent and not exported > as license from SPDX. > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> > --- > README.md | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/README.md b/README.md > index 654d1ab..3abd78c 100644 > --- a/README.md > +++ b/README.md > @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ Examples using meta-swupdate with evaluation boards (Beaglebone, RPI3) are provi > SWUpdate is released under GPLv2. A library to control SWUpdate is part of the > project and it is released under LGPLv2.1. > License information for any file is either explicitly stated > -or defaults to GPL version 2.0+. Extension written in Lua are subjected to > +or defaults to GPL version 2.0. Extension written in Lua are subjected to > Lua license (MIT). > > ## Community support > -- > 2.25.1 Reviewed-by: Mark Jonas <toertel@gmail.com>
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 654d1ab..3abd78c 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ Examples using meta-swupdate with evaluation boards (Beaglebone, RPI3) are provi SWUpdate is released under GPLv2. A library to control SWUpdate is part of the project and it is released under LGPLv2.1. License information for any file is either explicitly stated -or defaults to GPL version 2.0+. Extension written in Lua are subjected to +or defaults to GPL version 2.0. Extension written in Lua are subjected to Lua license (MIT). ## Community support
README says that license is GPLv2 but after a couple of sentences is reported as default GPL 2.0+, that it is not consistent and not exported as license from SPDX. Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> --- README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)