| Message ID | 20200721210033.15408-1-rdunlap@infradead.org |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Delegated to: | David Miller |
| Headers | show |
| Series | SPARC: backoff.h: delete a duplicated word | expand |
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:00:33 -0700 > Drop the repeated word "other". > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Applied, thanks Randy. > @David: > In arch/sparc/include/asm/cpu_type.h, line 12, > is that duplicated "ploos" correct? > sun4u = 0x03, /* V8 ploos ploos */ Yes, it's a funny way of saying "++" :-)
On 7/21/20 6:22 PM, David Miller wrote: >> @David: >> In arch/sparc/include/asm/cpu_type.h, line 12, >> is that duplicated "ploos" correct? >> sun4u = 0x03, /* V8 ploos ploos */ > > Yes, it's a funny way of saying "++" :-) I see. Thanks for the explanation.
--- linux-next-20200720.orig/arch/sparc/include/asm/backoff.h +++ linux-next-20200720/arch/sparc/include/asm/backoff.h @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ * * When we spin, we try to use an operation that will cause the * current cpu strand to block, and therefore make the core fully - * available to any other other runnable strands. There are two + * available to any other runnable strands. There are two * options, based upon cpu capabilities. * * On all cpus prior to SPARC-T4 we do three dummy reads of the
Drop the repeated word "other". Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org --- @David: In arch/sparc/include/asm/cpu_type.h, line 12, is that duplicated "ploos" correct? sun4u = 0x03, /* V8 ploos ploos */ arch/sparc/include/asm/backoff.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)