Message ID | 1458849742-162399-1-git-send-email-babu.moger@oracle.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | David Miller |
Headers | show |
From: Babu Moger <babu.moger@oracle.com> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 13:02:22 -0700 > We noticed this panic while enabling SR-IOV in sparc. ... > SR-IOV code looks for arch specific data while enabling > VFs. When VF device is added, driver probe function makes set > of calls to initialize the pci device. Because the VF device is > added different way than the normal PF device(which happens via > of_create_pci_dev for sparc), some of the arch specific initialization > does not happen for VF device. That causes panic when archdata is > accessed. > > To fix this, I have used already defined weak function > pcibios_setup_device to copy archdata from PF to VF. > Also verified the fix. > > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@oracle.com> > Signed-off-by: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com> > Reviewed-by: Ethan Zhao <ethan.zhao@oracle.com> Looks good, applied and queued up for -stable, thanks. Just a note, I am assuming that the VFs are not instantiated in the device tree. Because when you just memcpy the arch data over from the PF, one thing we end up doing is using the device node of the PF. I slightly cringed at the memcpy, because at least one of these pointers are to objects which are reference counted, the OF device. Generally speaking we don't really support hot-plug for OF probed devices, but if we did all of the device tree pointers have to be refcounted properly. So in the long term that whole sequence where we go: struct dev_archdata *sd; ... sd = &dev->dev.archdata; sd->iommu = pbm->iommu; sd->stc = &pbm->stc; sd->host_controller = pbm; sd->op = op = of_find_device_by_node(node); sd->numa_node = pbm->numa_node; should be encapsulated into a helper function, and both of_create_pci_dev() and this new pcibios_setup_device() can invoke it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi David, On 3/29/2016 7:57 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Babu Moger <babu.moger@oracle.com> > Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 13:02:22 -0700 > >> We noticed this panic while enabling SR-IOV in sparc. > ... >> SR-IOV code looks for arch specific data while enabling >> VFs. When VF device is added, driver probe function makes set >> of calls to initialize the pci device. Because the VF device is >> added different way than the normal PF device(which happens via >> of_create_pci_dev for sparc), some of the arch specific initialization >> does not happen for VF device. That causes panic when archdata is >> accessed. >> >> To fix this, I have used already defined weak function >> pcibios_setup_device to copy archdata from PF to VF. >> Also verified the fix. >> >> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@oracle.com> >> Signed-off-by: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com> >> Reviewed-by: Ethan Zhao <ethan.zhao@oracle.com> > > Looks good, applied and queued up for -stable, thanks. Thanks. > > Just a note, I am assuming that the VFs are not instantiated in the > device tree. Because when you just memcpy the arch data over from the > PF, one thing we end up doing is using the device node of the PF. No. VFs are not instantiated in device tree(/proc/device-tree) > > I slightly cringed at the memcpy, because at least one of these > pointers are to objects which are reference counted, the OF device. > > Generally speaking we don't really support hot-plug for OF probed > devices, but if we did all of the device tree pointers have to be > refcounted properly. > > So in the long term that whole sequence where we go: > > struct dev_archdata *sd; > ... > sd = &dev->dev.archdata; > sd->iommu = pbm->iommu; > sd->stc = &pbm->stc; > sd->host_controller = pbm; > sd->op = op = of_find_device_by_node(node); > sd->numa_node = pbm->numa_node; > > should be encapsulated into a helper function, and both > of_create_pci_dev() and this new pcibios_setup_device() can > invoke it. > Yes. Agree. We need to refactor the whole of_create_pci_dev path to support hot-plug for the long term. I will start looking at it. For now we should be fine with the current patch. thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:31:18AM -0500, Babu Moger wrote: > Hi David, > > On 3/29/2016 7:57 PM, David Miller wrote: > > From: Babu Moger <babu.moger@oracle.com> > > Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 13:02:22 -0700 > > > >> We noticed this panic while enabling SR-IOV in sparc. > > ... > >> SR-IOV code looks for arch specific data while enabling > >> VFs. When VF device is added, driver probe function makes set > >> of calls to initialize the pci device. Because the VF device is > >> added different way than the normal PF device(which happens via > >> of_create_pci_dev for sparc), some of the arch specific initialization > >> does not happen for VF device. That causes panic when archdata is > >> accessed. > >> > >> To fix this, I have used already defined weak function > >> pcibios_setup_device to copy archdata from PF to VF. > >> Also verified the fix. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@oracle.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com> > >> Reviewed-by: Ethan Zhao <ethan.zhao@oracle.com> > > > > Looks good, applied and queued up for -stable, thanks. > > Thanks. > > > > > Just a note, I am assuming that the VFs are not instantiated in the > > device tree. Because when you just memcpy the arch data over from the > > PF, one thing we end up doing is using the device node of the PF. > > No. VFs are not instantiated in device tree(/proc/device-tree) > > > > > I slightly cringed at the memcpy, because at least one of these > > pointers are to objects which are reference counted, the OF device. > > > > Generally speaking we don't really support hot-plug for OF probed > > devices, but if we did all of the device tree pointers have to be > > refcounted properly. > > > > So in the long term that whole sequence where we go: > > > > struct dev_archdata *sd; > > ... > > sd = &dev->dev.archdata; > > sd->iommu = pbm->iommu; > > sd->stc = &pbm->stc; > > sd->host_controller = pbm; > > sd->op = op = of_find_device_by_node(node); > > sd->numa_node = pbm->numa_node; > > > > should be encapsulated into a helper function, and both > > of_create_pci_dev() and this new pcibios_setup_device() can > > invoke it. > > > > Yes. Agree. We need to refactor the whole of_create_pci_dev path to support > hot-plug for the long term. I will start looking at it. For now we should be > fine with the current patch. thanks of_create_pci_dev() duplicates a lot of the code in pci_setup_device(). I wish we didn't have to do that because it's easy to let them get out of sync, but I don't know if there are any reasonable alternatives. I've wondered in the past whether it would be possible to use the pci_setup_device() path on sparc & powerpc by writing PCI config accessors that look up OF properties as needed to fabricate responses to config reads. Several of the drivers in drivers/pci/host/* do a little bit of this fabrication, although I don't think any go to the extent of using OF. Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c index badf095..9f9614d 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c @@ -994,6 +994,23 @@ void pcibios_set_master(struct pci_dev *dev) /* No special bus mastering setup handling */ } +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV +int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev) +{ + struct pci_dev *pdev; + + /* Add sriov arch specific initialization here. + * Copy dev_archdata from PF to VF + */ + if (dev->is_virtfn) { + pdev = dev->physfn; + memcpy(&dev->dev.archdata, &pdev->dev.archdata, + sizeof(struct dev_archdata)); + } + return 0; +} +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */ + static int __init pcibios_init(void) { pci_dfl_cache_line_size = 64 >> 2;