Message ID | 570EAE8B.7010706@nkgroup.cz |
---|---|
State | Rejected |
Headers | show |
Hi, On 13/04/2016 at 22:39:39 +0200, Tomas Krcka wrote : > This patch is for support of rv4162c7 RTC chip. > The device has same parameters as rv4162, but with different identification. > Tested with PhyTec module AM335x. > Well, technically, it is an rv4162. rv4162-c7 is the only available one. So this patch is not necessary. > Signed-off-by: Tomas Krcka <tomas.krcka@nkgroup.cz> > > --- > drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c > index d107a8e..1aa57d8 100644 > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id m41t80_id[] = { > { "m41st85", M41T80_FEATURE_HT | M41T80_FEATURE_BL | M41T80_FEATURE_SQ }, > { "m41st87", M41T80_FEATURE_HT | M41T80_FEATURE_BL | M41T80_FEATURE_SQ }, > { "rv4162", M41T80_FEATURE_SQ | M41T80_FEATURE_WD | M41T80_FEATURE_SQ_ALT }, > + { "rv4162c7", M41T80_FEATURE_SQ | M41T80_FEATURE_WD | M41T80_FEATURE_SQ_ALT }, > { } > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, m41t80_id); > -- 1.9.1 >
Hi, that's correct, but idetification of this chip is rv4162c7 so i2c_match_id() returns NULL. If it's there any workaround, how the chip can be detected automatically then OK, but without this patch it doesn't work for me. 2016-04-14 0:49 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>: > Hi, > > On 13/04/2016 at 22:39:39 +0200, Tomas Krcka wrote : >> This patch is for support of rv4162c7 RTC chip. >> The device has same parameters as rv4162, but with different identification. >> Tested with PhyTec module AM335x. >> > > Well, technically, it is an rv4162. rv4162-c7 is the only available one. > So this patch is not necessary. > >> Signed-off-by: Tomas Krcka <tomas.krcka@nkgroup.cz> >> >> --- >> drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c >> index d107a8e..1aa57d8 100644 >> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c >> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c >> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id m41t80_id[] = { >> { "m41st85", M41T80_FEATURE_HT | M41T80_FEATURE_BL | M41T80_FEATURE_SQ }, >> { "m41st87", M41T80_FEATURE_HT | M41T80_FEATURE_BL | M41T80_FEATURE_SQ }, >> { "rv4162", M41T80_FEATURE_SQ | M41T80_FEATURE_WD | M41T80_FEATURE_SQ_ALT }, >> + { "rv4162c7", M41T80_FEATURE_SQ | M41T80_FEATURE_WD | M41T80_FEATURE_SQ_ALT }, >> { } >> }; >> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, m41t80_id); >> -- 1.9.1 >> > > -- > Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons > Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering > http://free-electrons.com
Hi, On 14/04/2016 at 08:29:47 +0200, Tomas Krcka wrote : > Hi, > that's correct, but idetification of this chip is rv4162c7 so > i2c_match_id() returns NULL. > If it's there any workaround, how the chip can be detected > automatically then OK, but without this patch it doesn't work for me. > Just use rv4162 as your compatible string. That is what the mainline dtsi is doing for the phycore som: $ grep -C 2 rv4162 arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-phycore-som.dtsi i2c_rtc: rtc@68 { compatible = "rv4162"; reg = <0x68>; status = "disabled"; > 2016-04-14 0:49 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Belloni > <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>: > > Hi, > > > > On 13/04/2016 at 22:39:39 +0200, Tomas Krcka wrote : > >> This patch is for support of rv4162c7 RTC chip. > >> The device has same parameters as rv4162, but with different identification. > >> Tested with PhyTec module AM335x. > >> > > > > Well, technically, it is an rv4162. rv4162-c7 is the only available one. > > So this patch is not necessary. > > > >> Signed-off-by: Tomas Krcka <tomas.krcka@nkgroup.cz> > >> > >> --- > >> drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c | 1 + > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c > >> index d107a8e..1aa57d8 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c > >> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c > >> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id m41t80_id[] = { > >> { "m41st85", M41T80_FEATURE_HT | M41T80_FEATURE_BL | M41T80_FEATURE_SQ }, > >> { "m41st87", M41T80_FEATURE_HT | M41T80_FEATURE_BL | M41T80_FEATURE_SQ }, > >> { "rv4162", M41T80_FEATURE_SQ | M41T80_FEATURE_WD | M41T80_FEATURE_SQ_ALT }, > >> + { "rv4162c7", M41T80_FEATURE_SQ | M41T80_FEATURE_WD | M41T80_FEATURE_SQ_ALT }, > >> { } > >> }; > >> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, m41t80_id); > >> -- 1.9.1 > >> > > > > -- > > Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons > > Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering > > http://free-electrons.com
Hi, ok, good. Thanks. Patch is not needed. 2016-04-14 9:19 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>: > Hi, > > On 14/04/2016 at 08:29:47 +0200, Tomas Krcka wrote : >> Hi, >> that's correct, but idetification of this chip is rv4162c7 so >> i2c_match_id() returns NULL. >> If it's there any workaround, how the chip can be detected >> automatically then OK, but without this patch it doesn't work for me. >> > > Just use rv4162 as your compatible string. That is what the mainline dtsi > is doing for the phycore som: > > $ grep -C 2 rv4162 arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-phycore-som.dtsi > > i2c_rtc: rtc@68 { > compatible = "rv4162"; > reg = <0x68>; > status = "disabled"; > > >> 2016-04-14 0:49 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Belloni >> <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On 13/04/2016 at 22:39:39 +0200, Tomas Krcka wrote : >> >> This patch is for support of rv4162c7 RTC chip. >> >> The device has same parameters as rv4162, but with different identification. >> >> Tested with PhyTec module AM335x. >> >> >> > >> > Well, technically, it is an rv4162. rv4162-c7 is the only available one. >> > So this patch is not necessary. >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Tomas Krcka <tomas.krcka@nkgroup.cz> >> >> >> >> --- >> >> drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c | 1 + >> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c >> >> index d107a8e..1aa57d8 100644 >> >> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c >> >> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c >> >> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id m41t80_id[] = { >> >> { "m41st85", M41T80_FEATURE_HT | M41T80_FEATURE_BL | M41T80_FEATURE_SQ }, >> >> { "m41st87", M41T80_FEATURE_HT | M41T80_FEATURE_BL | M41T80_FEATURE_SQ }, >> >> { "rv4162", M41T80_FEATURE_SQ | M41T80_FEATURE_WD | M41T80_FEATURE_SQ_ALT }, >> >> + { "rv4162c7", M41T80_FEATURE_SQ | M41T80_FEATURE_WD | M41T80_FEATURE_SQ_ALT }, >> >> { } >> >> }; >> >> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, m41t80_id); >> >> -- 1.9.1 >> >> >> > >> > -- >> > Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons >> > Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering >> > http://free-electrons.com > > -- > Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons > Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering > http://free-electrons.com
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c index d107a8e..1aa57d8 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id m41t80_id[] = { { "m41st85", M41T80_FEATURE_HT | M41T80_FEATURE_BL | M41T80_FEATURE_SQ }, { "m41st87", M41T80_FEATURE_HT | M41T80_FEATURE_BL | M41T80_FEATURE_SQ }, { "rv4162", M41T80_FEATURE_SQ | M41T80_FEATURE_WD | M41T80_FEATURE_SQ_ALT }, + { "rv4162c7", M41T80_FEATURE_SQ | M41T80_FEATURE_WD | M41T80_FEATURE_SQ_ALT }, { } }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, m41t80_id);
This patch is for support of rv4162c7 RTC chip. The device has same parameters as rv4162, but with different identification. Tested with PhyTec module AM335x. Signed-off-by: Tomas Krcka <tomas.krcka@nkgroup.cz> --- drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) -- 1.9.1