diff mbox

[1/1] rtc: tps65910: renaming irq to match device

Message ID 1353313413-17382-1-git-send-email-sivaramn@nvidia.com
State Superseded
Headers show

Commit Message

Sivaram Nair Nov. 19, 2012, 8:23 a.m. UTC
This is a cosmetic change to rename the irq name to match the device
name.

Signed-off-by: Sivaram Nair <sivaramn@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-tps65910.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Yegor Yefremov Nov. 19, 2012, 10:05 a.m. UTC | #1
On Monday, November 19, 2012 9:24:31 AM UTC+1, Sivaram Nair wrote:
>
> This is a cosmetic change to rename the irq name to match the device 
> name. 
>

I have  a question regarding irq. There is statically assigned irq in 
drivers/mfd/tps65910.c

static struct resource rtc_resources[] = {
        {
                .start  = TPS65910_IRQ_RTC_ALARM,
                .end    = TPS65910_IRQ_RTC_ALARM,
                .flags  = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
        }
};

for me it doesn't make much sense, cause it is an external chip and I can 
attach INT1 pin to any pin on my SoC. How can I assign this pin 
dynamically? How can I specify it the dts file?

Am I missing something?

Regards,
Yegor
Yegor Yefremov Nov. 19, 2012, 10:19 a.m. UTC | #2
On Monday, November 19, 2012 11:05:19 AM UTC+1, yegorich wrote:
>
> On Monday, November 19, 2012 9:24:31 AM UTC+1, Sivaram Nair wrote:
>>
>> This is a cosmetic change to rename the irq name to match the device 
>> name. 
>>
>
> I have  a question regarding irq. There is statically assigned irq in 
> drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
>
> static struct resource rtc_resources[] = {
>         {
>                 .start  = TPS65910_IRQ_RTC_ALARM,
>                 .end    = TPS65910_IRQ_RTC_ALARM,
>                 .flags  = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
>         }
> };
>
> for me it doesn't make much sense, cause it is an external chip and I can 
> attach INT1 pin to any pin on my SoC. How can I assign this pin 
> dynamically? How can I specify it the dts file?
>
> Am I missing something?
>

Sorry for the noise. Just found the patches: 
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/2/324
Stephen Warren Nov. 19, 2012, 4:26 p.m. UTC | #3
On 11/19/2012 01:23 AM, Sivaram Nair wrote:
> This is a cosmetic change to rename the irq name to match the device
> name.

I believe you need to repost this to Andrew Morton since he's been
picking up RTC patches.

You don't need to post the patch to linux-tegra@ since it doesn't have
anything to do with Tegra really, even though Tegra happens to use the
driver.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps65910.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps65910.c
index 7a82337..e8d44bc 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps65910.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps65910.c
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@  static int __devinit tps65910_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
 		tps65910_rtc_interrupt, IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW,
-		"rtc-tps65910", &pdev->dev);
+		dev_name(&pdev->dev), &pdev->dev);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "IRQ is not free.\n");
 		return ret;