Message ID | 87fwwj14ye.fsf@ginnungagap.bsc.es |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Hi :) On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 02:44, LluĂs <xscript@gmx.net> wrote: > I'm still not very tuned-in into the code, but I think this piece should > use _raw access primitives: I know nothing about your patch, but I suggest to rewrite this post so it follows patch submission format e.g comment, signed off then the patch itself.... :) No offense, ok? :)
Mulyadi Santosa writes: > I know nothing about your patch, but I suggest to rewrite this post so > it follows patch submission format e.g comment, signed off then the > patch itself.... :) > No offense, ok? :) None taken. I've sent it again with (I suppose) the adequate format. Lluis
diff --git a/linux-user/signal.c b/linux-user/signal.c index 77683f7..097da9d 100644 --- a/linux-user/signal.c +++ b/linux-user/signal.c @@ -982,8 +982,8 @@ restore_sigcontext(CPUX86State *env, struct target_sigcontext *sc, int *peax) env->regs[R_ECX] = tswapl(sc->ecx); env->eip = tswapl(sc->eip); - cpu_x86_load_seg(env, R_CS, lduw(&sc->cs) | 3); - cpu_x86_load_seg(env, R_SS, lduw(&sc->ss) | 3); + cpu_x86_load_seg(env, R_CS, lduw_raw(&sc->cs) | 3); + cpu_x86_load_seg(env, R_SS, lduw_raw(&sc->ss) | 3); tmpflags = tswapl(sc->eflags); env->eflags = (env->eflags & ~0x40DD5) | (tmpflags & 0x40DD5);