From patchwork Sun May 12 23:28:25 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: BALATON Zoltan X-Patchwork-Id: 1934446 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VczYF4D7Fz1yfq for ; Mon, 13 May 2024 09:37:05 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s6Id6-0002kp-BN; Sun, 12 May 2024 19:29:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s6Icd-00020v-Rg; Sun, 12 May 2024 19:28:53 -0400 Received: from zero.eik.bme.hu ([2001:738:2001:2001::2001]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s6Icb-0000R0-0Y; Sun, 12 May 2024 19:28:51 -0400 Received: from zero.eik.bme.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zero.eik.bme.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18E24E678A; Mon, 13 May 2024 01:28:26 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at eik.bme.hu Received: from zero.eik.bme.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by zero.eik.bme.hu (zero.eik.bme.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10028) with ESMTP id dcCSVDzx_v2j; Mon, 13 May 2024 01:28:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by zero.eik.bme.hu (Postfix, from userid 432) id 0A4F14E678B; Mon, 13 May 2024 01:28:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <3201d0f7ef4db12de4055a44ef0c863f3f333fe6.1715555763.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu> In-Reply-To: References: From: BALATON Zoltan Subject: [PATCH v7 50/61] target/ppc/mmu_common.c: Remove ptem field from mmu_ctx_t MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org Cc: Nicholas Piggin , Daniel Henrique Barboza Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 01:28:25 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:738:2001:2001::2001; envelope-from=balaton@eik.bme.hu; helo=zero.eik.bme.hu X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Instead of passing around ptem in context use it once in the same function so it can be removed from mmu_ctx_t. Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan --- target/ppc/mmu_common.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c index a4bb8c8c3e..f09f7417c2 100644 --- a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c +++ b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c @@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ typedef struct { hwaddr raddr; /* Real address */ int prot; /* Protection bits */ - target_ulong ptem; /* Virtual segment ID | API */ int key; /* Access key */ } mmu_ctx_t; @@ -95,16 +94,18 @@ int ppc6xx_tlb_getnum(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong eaddr, static int ppc6xx_tlb_check(CPUPPCState *env, mmu_ctx_t *ctx, target_ulong eaddr, - MMUAccessType access_type, bool nx) + MMUAccessType access_type, target_ulong ptem, + bool nx) { ppc6xx_tlb_t *tlb; target_ulong *pte1p; int nr, best, way, ret; + bool is_code = (access_type == MMU_INST_FETCH); best = -1; ret = -1; /* No TLB found */ for (way = 0; way < env->nb_ways; way++) { - nr = ppc6xx_tlb_getnum(env, eaddr, way, access_type == MMU_INST_FETCH); + nr = ppc6xx_tlb_getnum(env, eaddr, way, is_code); tlb = &env->tlb.tlb6[nr]; /* This test "emulates" the PTE index match for hardware TLBs */ if ((eaddr & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) != tlb->EPN) { @@ -124,7 +125,7 @@ static int ppc6xx_tlb_check(CPUPPCState *env, access_type == MMU_INST_FETCH ? 'I' : 'D'); /* Check validity and table match */ if (!pte_is_valid(tlb->pte0) || ((tlb->pte0 >> 6) & 1) != 0 || - (tlb->pte0 & PTE_PTEM_MASK) != ctx->ptem) { + (tlb->pte0 & PTE_PTEM_MASK) != ptem) { continue; } /* all matches should have equal RPN, WIMG & PP */ @@ -164,6 +165,10 @@ static int ppc6xx_tlb_check(CPUPPCState *env, } } } + if (ret == -1) { + int r = is_code ? SPR_ICMP : SPR_DCMP; + env->spr[r] = ptem; + } #if defined(DUMP_PAGE_TABLES) if (qemu_loglevel_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU)) { CPUState *cs = env_cpu(env); @@ -293,7 +298,7 @@ static int mmu6xx_get_physical_address(CPUPPCState *env, mmu_ctx_t *ctx, { PowerPCCPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env); hwaddr hash; - target_ulong vsid, sr, pgidx; + target_ulong vsid, sr, pgidx, ptem; bool pr, ds, nx; /* First try to find a BAT entry if there are any */ @@ -320,7 +325,7 @@ static int mmu6xx_get_physical_address(CPUPPCState *env, mmu_ctx_t *ctx, access_type == MMU_DATA_STORE, type); pgidx = (eaddr & ~SEGMENT_MASK_256M) >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS; hash = vsid ^ pgidx; - ctx->ptem = (vsid << 7) | (pgidx >> 10); + ptem = (vsid << 7) | (pgidx >> 10); /* Virtual segment ID | API */ qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, "pte segment: key=%d ds %d nx %d vsid " TARGET_FMT_lx "\n", ctx->key, ds, nx, vsid); @@ -339,7 +344,7 @@ static int mmu6xx_get_physical_address(CPUPPCState *env, mmu_ctx_t *ctx, /* Initialize real address with an invalid value */ ctx->raddr = (hwaddr)-1ULL; /* Software TLB search */ - return ppc6xx_tlb_check(env, ctx, eaddr, access_type, nx); + return ppc6xx_tlb_check(env, ctx, eaddr, access_type, ptem, nx); } /* Direct-store segment : absolutely *BUGGY* for now */ @@ -741,7 +746,7 @@ static bool ppc_6xx_xlate(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr, cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_IFTLB; env->error_code = 1 << 18; env->spr[SPR_IMISS] = eaddr; - env->spr[SPR_ICMP] = 0x80000000 | ctx.ptem; + env->spr[SPR_ICMP] |= 0x80000000; goto tlb_miss; case -2: /* Access rights violation */ @@ -772,7 +777,7 @@ static bool ppc_6xx_xlate(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr, env->error_code = 0; } env->spr[SPR_DMISS] = eaddr; - env->spr[SPR_DCMP] = 0x80000000 | ctx.ptem; + env->spr[SPR_DCMP] |= 0x80000000; tlb_miss: env->error_code |= ctx.key << 19; env->spr[SPR_HASH1] = ppc_hash32_hpt_base(cpu) +