From patchwork Thu Jan 18 07:52:44 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Michael Tokarev X-Patchwork-Id: 1887761 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TFw7n4sHwz23dx for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 18:57:09 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQNF8-0001ZR-KP; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 02:55:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQNF7-0001X4-7s; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 02:55:17 -0500 Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQNF5-0007cg-9A; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 02:55:16 -0500 Received: from tsrv.corpit.ru (tsrv.tls.msk.ru [192.168.177.2]) by isrv.corpit.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9B34503B; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 10:54:35 +0300 (MSK) Received: from tls.msk.ru (mjt.wg.tls.msk.ru [192.168.177.130]) by tsrv.corpit.ru (Postfix) with SMTP id 20B97661A4; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 10:54:06 +0300 (MSK) Received: (nullmailer pid 2381679 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 18 Jan 2024 07:54:04 -0000 From: Michael Tokarev To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org, Richard Henderson , =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Michael Tokarev Subject: [Stable-8.2.1 17/38] tcg/ppc: Use new registers for LQ destination Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 10:52:44 +0300 Message-Id: <20240118075404.2381519-17-mjt@tls.msk.ru> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=86.62.121.231; envelope-from=mjt@tls.msk.ru; helo=isrv.corpit.ru X-Spam_score_int: -68 X-Spam_score: -6.9 X-Spam_bar: ------ X-Spam_report: (-6.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org From: Richard Henderson LQ has a constraint that RTp != RA, else SIGILL. Therefore, force the destination of INDEX_op_qemu_*_ld128 to be a new register pair, so that it cannot overlap the input address. This requires new support in process_op_defs and tcg_reg_alloc_op. Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Fixes: 526cd4ec01f ("tcg/ppc: Support 128-bit load/store") Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Message-Id: <20240102013456.131846-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson (cherry picked from commit ca5bed07d0e7e0530c2cafbc134c4f74e582ac50) Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev diff --git a/tcg/ppc/tcg-target-con-set.h b/tcg/ppc/tcg-target-con-set.h index bbd7b21247..cb47b29452 100644 --- a/tcg/ppc/tcg-target-con-set.h +++ b/tcg/ppc/tcg-target-con-set.h @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ C_O1_I3(v, v, v, v) C_O1_I4(r, r, ri, rZ, rZ) C_O1_I4(r, r, r, ri, ri) C_O2_I1(r, r, r) -C_O2_I1(o, m, r) +C_N1O1_I1(o, m, r) C_O2_I2(r, r, r, r) C_O2_I4(r, r, rI, rZM, r, r) C_O2_I4(r, r, r, r, rI, rZM) diff --git a/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc b/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc index 856c3b18f5..54816967bc 100644 --- a/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc +++ b/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc @@ -2595,6 +2595,7 @@ static void tcg_out_qemu_ldst_i128(TCGContext *s, TCGReg datalo, TCGReg datahi, tcg_debug_assert(!need_bswap); tcg_debug_assert(datalo & 1); tcg_debug_assert(datahi == datalo - 1); + tcg_debug_assert(!is_ld || datahi != index); insn = is_ld ? LQ : STQ; tcg_out32(s, insn | TAI(datahi, index, 0)); } else { @@ -4071,7 +4072,7 @@ static TCGConstraintSetIndex tcg_target_op_def(TCGOpcode op) case INDEX_op_qemu_ld_a32_i128: case INDEX_op_qemu_ld_a64_i128: - return C_O2_I1(o, m, r); + return C_N1O1_I1(o, m, r); case INDEX_op_qemu_st_a32_i128: case INDEX_op_qemu_st_a64_i128: return C_O0_I3(o, m, r); diff --git a/tcg/tcg.c b/tcg/tcg.c index 896a36caeb..e2c38f6d11 100644 --- a/tcg/tcg.c +++ b/tcg/tcg.c @@ -653,6 +653,7 @@ static void tcg_out_movext3(TCGContext *s, const TCGMovExtend *i1, #define C_O1_I4(O1, I1, I2, I3, I4) C_PFX5(c_o1_i4_, O1, I1, I2, I3, I4), #define C_N1_I2(O1, I1, I2) C_PFX3(c_n1_i2_, O1, I1, I2), +#define C_N1O1_I1(O1, O2, I1) C_PFX3(c_n1o1_i1_, O1, O2, I1), #define C_N2_I1(O1, O2, I1) C_PFX3(c_n2_i1_, O1, O2, I1), #define C_O2_I1(O1, O2, I1) C_PFX3(c_o2_i1_, O1, O2, I1), @@ -676,6 +677,7 @@ static TCGConstraintSetIndex tcg_target_op_def(TCGOpcode); #undef C_O1_I3 #undef C_O1_I4 #undef C_N1_I2 +#undef C_N1O1_I1 #undef C_N2_I1 #undef C_O2_I1 #undef C_O2_I2 @@ -696,6 +698,7 @@ static TCGConstraintSetIndex tcg_target_op_def(TCGOpcode); #define C_O1_I4(O1, I1, I2, I3, I4) { .args_ct_str = { #O1, #I1, #I2, #I3, #I4 } }, #define C_N1_I2(O1, I1, I2) { .args_ct_str = { "&" #O1, #I1, #I2 } }, +#define C_N1O1_I1(O1, O2, I1) { .args_ct_str = { "&" #O1, #O2, #I1 } }, #define C_N2_I1(O1, O2, I1) { .args_ct_str = { "&" #O1, "&" #O2, #I1 } }, #define C_O2_I1(O1, O2, I1) { .args_ct_str = { #O1, #O2, #I1 } }, @@ -718,6 +721,7 @@ static const TCGTargetOpDef constraint_sets[] = { #undef C_O1_I3 #undef C_O1_I4 #undef C_N1_I2 +#undef C_N1O1_I1 #undef C_N2_I1 #undef C_O2_I1 #undef C_O2_I2 @@ -738,6 +742,7 @@ static const TCGTargetOpDef constraint_sets[] = { #define C_O1_I4(O1, I1, I2, I3, I4) C_PFX5(c_o1_i4_, O1, I1, I2, I3, I4) #define C_N1_I2(O1, I1, I2) C_PFX3(c_n1_i2_, O1, I1, I2) +#define C_N1O1_I1(O1, O2, I1) C_PFX3(c_n1o1_i1_, O1, O2, I1) #define C_N2_I1(O1, O2, I1) C_PFX3(c_n2_i1_, O1, O2, I1) #define C_O2_I1(O1, O2, I1) C_PFX3(c_o2_i1_, O1, O2, I1) @@ -2988,6 +2993,7 @@ static void process_op_defs(TCGContext *s) .pair = 2, .pair_index = o, .regs = def->args_ct[o].regs << 1, + .newreg = def->args_ct[o].newreg, }; def->args_ct[o].pair = 1; def->args_ct[o].pair_index = i; @@ -3004,6 +3010,7 @@ static void process_op_defs(TCGContext *s) .pair = 1, .pair_index = o, .regs = def->args_ct[o].regs >> 1, + .newreg = def->args_ct[o].newreg, }; def->args_ct[o].pair = 2; def->args_ct[o].pair_index = i; @@ -5036,17 +5043,21 @@ static void tcg_reg_alloc_op(TCGContext *s, const TCGOp *op) break; case 1: /* first of pair */ - tcg_debug_assert(!arg_ct->newreg); if (arg_ct->oalias) { reg = new_args[arg_ct->alias_index]; - break; + } else if (arg_ct->newreg) { + reg = tcg_reg_alloc_pair(s, arg_ct->regs, + i_allocated_regs | o_allocated_regs, + output_pref(op, k), + ts->indirect_base); + } else { + reg = tcg_reg_alloc_pair(s, arg_ct->regs, o_allocated_regs, + output_pref(op, k), + ts->indirect_base); } - reg = tcg_reg_alloc_pair(s, arg_ct->regs, o_allocated_regs, - output_pref(op, k), ts->indirect_base); break; case 2: /* second of pair */ - tcg_debug_assert(!arg_ct->newreg); if (arg_ct->oalias) { reg = new_args[arg_ct->alias_index]; } else {